28 Days Later...
Fox Searchlight Pictures | Release Date: June 27, 2003
7.7
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 508 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
424
Mixed:
56
Negative:
28
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
ChaseG.Mar 17, 2008
To me, what Days has always held over the head of Weeks is simply this...mood. 28 Days Later has an unparalleled mood and style in its execution, in almost everything it does. It doesn't just describe events to you, like some movies do, To me, what Days has always held over the head of Weeks is simply this...mood. 28 Days Later has an unparalleled mood and style in its execution, in almost everything it does. It doesn't just describe events to you, like some movies do, but it portrays it in such a way that it's genuinely chilling and believable. In comparison to Weeks, Days doesn't hold what it has over you like a bludgeon, it doesn't attempt to beat you with the speed of the zombies, or the gore. But it places it in supreme positions in the film to have the utmost effect, at the climax, at the low-point, etc. And the best part about it, is that it manages to achieve a constant level of edginess, a constant thrill even when there's nothing on the screen, it manages all of this without a guitar-blasting soundtrack (however awesome the Weeks theme is) or cameras explicitly showing that zombies are just running at you, spewing blood as they go. In fact, you are often scared in this movie simply by the fact that you don't really see what's scaring you, which is a true sign of mastery in the genre. On the other end of the spectrum, all performances in this film are excellent, the chemistry between Seline and Jim is believable especially. All characters have an edge of sympathy, and portray to you that not everyone to survive the apocalypse will be beefy, bulky men with chain guns. It defies a lot of things that would be expected of it, and ditches all normal conventions, pulling it off with grace and poise. It's a must see for anyone who can stand the level of intensity. It's a must see for anyone who can stand the.… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful
9
rodericrinehartAug 14, 2010
I really enjoyed this movie and the zombie origin story in provided. The actors in it do a great job. I was impressed with this one, and liked it equally as well as the second one.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
DamienDarko777May 6, 2011
Fantastic horror film. I daresay there hasn't been a zombie film this good since the original Dawn of the Dead. What really makes it work is the utterly desolate atmosphere, and the convincing desperation of the performers. Scary but notFantastic horror film. I daresay there hasn't been a zombie film this good since the original Dawn of the Dead. What really makes it work is the utterly desolate atmosphere, and the convincing desperation of the performers. Scary but not reliant on gore, this is a class act. One of the best horror films in decades.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
survivorfan989Jan 16, 2013
Quite different to your American zombie movie as it focus more on survival rather than a zombie apocalypse. Lead by a great cast, in particular Naomie Harris who plays a bad-ass Selena. The zombies aren't even zombies, more-so humans infectedQuite different to your American zombie movie as it focus more on survival rather than a zombie apocalypse. Lead by a great cast, in particular Naomie Harris who plays a bad-ass Selena. The zombies aren't even zombies, more-so humans infected with rage, which is a nice little twist on the genre. It is fairly slow-paced at times but tends to get quite exciting towards the end with a few shocks in there. Overall an impressive zombie flick from the Brits that also delivered an impressive sequel!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
LemonmanJan 2, 2014
Hands down, the best horror movie ever made since The Shining in 1980. Danny Boyle proves his versatility as a director with this movie, mixing a love story with real, intense scares. The scenery is memorable, as is the phenomenal John MurphyHands down, the best horror movie ever made since The Shining in 1980. Danny Boyle proves his versatility as a director with this movie, mixing a love story with real, intense scares. The scenery is memorable, as is the phenomenal John Murphy soundtrack. I highly recommend this movie. Also, in response to some of the negative comments on here, the cameras were intentionally rough until the end of the movie. I felt it added confusion and harshness to the most intense parts.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
grandpajoe6191Oct 19, 2011
Sure, Danny Boyle's "28 Days Later" is a wonderful, gritty, realistic example of what the world would be if there was a zombie apocalypse (which I highly doubt). But except for the pure horror entertainment and several political satire, it'sSure, Danny Boyle's "28 Days Later" is a wonderful, gritty, realistic example of what the world would be if there was a zombie apocalypse (which I highly doubt). But except for the pure horror entertainment and several political satire, it's pretty much another linear zombie film that really isn't any different from Romero's.… Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
10
lilkillpappyJan 31, 2013
Best zombie film of all time. Great pacing, great story, great zombies, full of suspense, realistic dialog, disturbing, morbid, and violent. What more do you need?
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
RichS.Jun 1, 2007
One of the worst movies I've ever seen. I'll always remember how bad it was because I was laughing the whole way through.
0 of 3 users found this helpful
10
JohnSep 13, 2007
I really loved this movie. Finally a movie with ass-kickingly fast zombies. But i see a lot of zero's up here and as I read i got the impression that most of those people didnt understand the movie so im gonna try to help some of the I really loved this movie. Finally a movie with ass-kickingly fast zombies. But i see a lot of zero's up here and as I read i got the impression that most of those people didnt understand the movie so im gonna try to help some of the points the complained about. 1) Now the reason there is light in the supermarket is because if you look really closely you will find its not actually a ceiling, ok, its just one big hole. I bet u missed that. 2) They aren't zombies they are pissed off because its not really a "virus" its more like people are transferring periods to each other. 3) The reason they dont attack other infected is because once you get bit...well...i uhhhhh...yea...4) The army fellows didn't want to get with the little girl as a cure, but just to rebuild the entire human race with 9 guys ad 2 girls. So you see once you fully understand the movie, you'll love it that much more.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
MikeD.Dec 24, 2009
28 months after I watched this movie and I still think it's the worst movie of the last century. Not only is it boring but it lacks all horror/suspense. Do not watch. Save yourself the time.
0 of 5 users found this helpful
4
EdgarM.Mar 30, 2009
Just another way to do a zombie movie. In this version a virus escapes because of a raid by PETA type activists on a research facility in the UK. Apparently the virus causes those who are infected to fly into a rage and dismember the first Just another way to do a zombie movie. In this version a virus escapes because of a raid by PETA type activists on a research facility in the UK. Apparently the virus causes those who are infected to fly into a rage and dismember the first person they see. Sound familiar? Somehow, they attack only uninfected humans, not each other. But humankind may be safe after all since not one infected person strays beyond the UK so the world is safe from Perfidious Albion's latest blunder. Nothing really connects. It's just another freak show with a happy ending, i.e., the lovers survive and the bad guys are all gone.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
JeffC.Oct 25, 2008
People who direct music videos shouldn't direct movies.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
5
MichaelRMar 24, 2008
Its passable.You're not missing anything horrifying if you don't see this movie.Its nowhere near as great as dawn of the dead which this movie seems to resemble only it has less zombies and a different ending.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
7
EnsiMar 28, 2013
This is a pretty enjoyable film. It is slightly low-budget though, and you notice some moments that just doesn't make sense. The storyline itself is not very spectacular or very intense, but it is an enjoyable watch nontheless. I enjoyed it.This is a pretty enjoyable film. It is slightly low-budget though, and you notice some moments that just doesn't make sense. The storyline itself is not very spectacular or very intense, but it is an enjoyable watch nontheless. I enjoyed it. It's not it's not great.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Mad_Hatter91May 9, 2013
A truly great film that, in addition to being a horror film is also very dramatic, which makes us reflect on human violence. In fact the contagion occurred because of some monkeys infected with a strong form of anger. This has led to despairA truly great film that, in addition to being a horror film is also very dramatic, which makes us reflect on human violence. In fact the contagion occurred because of some monkeys infected with a strong form of anger. This has led to despair and in the movie is an example of the soldiers who have been the ultimate form of civilization and who are so desperate to behave in an inhumane way. Interesting photography that gives us a picture of how both England after infection, and even the good direction.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
beingryanjudeSep 3, 2014
There are good zombie films and there are bad ones. There are good movies featuring Cillian Murphy and there are bad ones. 28 Days Later is both a poor representation of exciting zombie-entertainment and Cillian Murphy's talents.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
cameronmorewoodNov 18, 2012
The camera work is nothing short of genius. Too bad the budget was too low to pay for good quality cameras.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
kublay0880Dec 10, 2012
It's definitively not the best zombies movie out there, they did produced great movie scenarios and fair picture display, the story it's very good but at the same time the movie it's attractive and cliched. Cillian Murphy's acting performanceIt's definitively not the best zombies movie out there, they did produced great movie scenarios and fair picture display, the story it's very good but at the same time the movie it's attractive and cliched. Cillian Murphy's acting performance does save some pieces of the movie but it wasn't enough.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
MeritCobaSep 21, 2015
In a previous review I thumbed down this movie for I find that it is not a particular good movie. I decided to redo my review as many people argued that the stupid decisions, which was my biggest annoyance with the movie, can be explained andIn a previous review I thumbed down this movie for I find that it is not a particular good movie. I decided to redo my review as many people argued that the stupid decisions, which was my biggest annoyance with the movie, can be explained and thus are no arguments at all.
I do not agree with this and will try to show why this movie isn't any good and why the stupid decisions are at the heart of the problem.

Because metacritic allows only for a limited amount of text I have to be brief and cut to the chase. But first let me say that it is no good arguing that a movie has be done before. Even if that is the case, this has nothing to do with the movie itself. Many things have been done before. As someone said, if redoing a movie makes it bad, then the universally acclaimed movie the Maltese Falcon by John Huston would fall in that category.

A movie is a story and a story requires at least these two things: good characters and a good plot. Good characters point to believable people and believable people we can connect with, even if we don't like them. A good plot points to believable events, even if the these events are illogical in themselves.
Note that with believable I do not mean: because it can really happen in life, but I mean: that it is accepted as being consistent with the internal logic of the story. For instance: if a story accepts that magic exists and can be used, then it stands to reason that someone can be a magic user, even though magic has not been proven to exist in real life.
This point makes short work of arguments as: why do the infected not attack each other? They do not because the world works that way and we do not require an explanation.

Good characters have traits that define them. Examples can especially be found in cartoon characters. Take as example Mickey Mouse(naive and brave), Donald Duck(temperamental, committed) and Goofy(lovable, clumsy, silly, easygoing). These cartoon characters do not only posses these traits, but to a large degree these traits are part of the way they look and even move(goofy being tall, thin and moving in a clumsy manner).

Let's turn to the central character of the movie. What traits does he display? The only trait he consistently shows throughout the movie is that he is dumb-witted to the point of being a danger to the others around him. He does not have something like the determined kick ass chick attitude of the girl he meets in the story(Selena) nor does he have the dedication and boisterous nature of the father. This then is the central character in the world with whom we have to connect and his only discerning quality is that he is too dumb be alive(for long).

The logic of a story is grounded in the real world for we have nothing else to go on. So in general we assume that everything of the real world applies unless it is explicitly changed for the story. So we can assume that people do things like eating, drinking and having a dump without seeing them do these mundane activities in the movie. No movie requires to show you this, but we assume it happens and when it is needed for the plot it will be shown.

Let's have a look at the plot. 28 days later abounds with stupidity. The father exposes everyone to unnecessary danger by driving his taxi through a tunnel with wrecks. They have lunch out in the open exposed. They make noise despite knowing that it attracts infected. The father exposes himself to blood, despite knowing better. Instead of holing up for the night in a room that is defensible, they use the ground floor one with windows that can be jumped through by infected. This is just a random set of the stupidity in the movie.

Now stupidity in the world of 28 days later should lead to death and hence most of the people involved by rights die or should die. But this can not be the group of people that survive in this dangerous world. It requires qualities that allow you to survive. The characters and the plot are therefore hugely inconsistent with the world of 28 days later..

The only survivors in the movie stay alive despite a tendency to make stupid decisions, while apparently the rest of the inhabitants of the UK, the more sensible ones presumable, were killed by the infection or something else(wise decisions?). Or perhaps they did not die at all but fled in time? This requires explanation, but we get none. Therefore this movie is bad because it doesn't explain how people survive so long while making a string of stupid mistakes.

This is a central weakness in the movie which makes it a bad movie, despite being thought provoking(where?), despite having nice visuals(?), despite having good music, despite anything else. A movie ought to be a believable story with believable characters. They both are badly drawn in this movie, hence the movie is bad.
No two ways about it… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
JohnWittenMay 2, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 28 Days Later is something of a modern cult classic but even so, it’s hard to believe that it only came out fourteen-fifteen years ago. But then again, it’s also hard to believe that it DID come out fourteen-fifteen years ago. 2007 sequel 28 Weeks Later and talk regarding a potential third and fourth series film notwithstanding, the film operates as most cult classics do so well- telling a story that is in many ways a circular journey and neatly wraps many details up while maintaining the intrigue and mystery by leaving some relatively unanswered as well. Although fans/victims of the lore and universe will know that many details and background interests have been added in the years since- comic books, graphic novels, a film sequel and more, the best part about any zombie apocalypse (besides it being horrid to be stuck in) is that anything can happen.

The sixties, seventies, eighties, and even nineties all had their famous horror zombie flicks and we’d seen many tall tales come and go- Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead, and Day of the Dead to name a few. We’ve even seen some surprisingly good films since- I Am Legend, The Crazies, Shaun of the Dead, and Dawn of the Dead (2004). 28 Days Later kicked all of this off however, and not just in the film industry. Prior to the reinvention of the classic zombie thriller-horror romp many considered the genre to be dead and buried like westerns and eighties action flicks. Afterwards however we’ve been treated to a resurgence in films, literature, and even gaming. Left 4 Dead and Dead Rising are two of the bigger franchises out there and they both prominently feature the zombie apocalypse in entirely different ways.

Not only is 28 Days Later a good film and a good example of what to do in terms of filming the zombie uprising, but it deserves its status as a cult classic because it is both a harrowing experience against WWZ-like zombies and it is a cinematic experience that should be appreciated to the fullest. The camera work in Danny Boyle’s zombie thriller is spectacular- both in the long pans across the desolate London horizon and the tense emotions elicited throughout every chase sequence and encounter. Although it reestablishes the now commonplace trope that humans are their own worst enemy even in the dead uprising, 28 Days Later focuses both on the visceral feelings and emotions of mankind in reaction to the dead and undead as well.

Although we’ve been treated to two feature-length films that tell pretty decent stories within their own version of the zombie apocalypse, I’m really excited for what the future might hold for a series such as 28 ___ Later especially in the wake of the immense success of shows such as The Walking Dead (and the Kirkman comics). I would love nothing more than to see yet another quality zombie game released set in a similarly dark and gritty world to the films and perhaps even set within the same universe and utilizing some of the abundant lore as well. So far we’ve been given Zombi (originally for Wii U) which is probably the closest we’ve yet come to a fully realized and detailed experience in the vein of 28 Days Later, and that game was decent for what it offered in interesting gimmicks and mechanics.

I’m doing my best not to really spoil the great narrative even though it’s probably considered a bit cliche nowadays- not at the time, considering it is what so many movies now base themselves off of it seems. Not only is it a fully worthwhile and fundamental stroke of genius in terms of storytelling and cinematography, the acting itself is pretty spot on and the relatively unknown actors (besides Brendan Gleeson and Chris Eccleston) sell their roles perfectly. The 2004 version of Dawn of the Dead may be one of the most recognizable and pretty decent zombie films of the early 2000s, but let’s not forget the fact that 28 Days Later started things off right and paved the way not only for the shambling dead but the night-roaming mutants of I Am Legend as well. All things said and done, Boyle’s film would’ve also been fine without a sequel but expanding the 28 universe hasn’t been the worst idea either.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JohnnyStephensAug 31, 2013
A classic zombie movie. One of the best horror pictures ever made. I really liked it and if you haven't seen it yet, you don't know what horror film means. Bravo!!! Shocking!!!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
BWETMatangiAug 26, 2013
This movie was very, very boring. I was not impressed with the storyline or the acting. The movie contains a naked man laying on a hospital bed. Some language.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
MovieGuysMay 15, 2014
28 Days Later packs a solid punch for zombie-movie lovers, and even for the average moviegoer. Boyle's style of filmmaking is not something that I've ever liked, but I have to admit that the movie itself was pretty good. It is a razor sharp28 Days Later packs a solid punch for zombie-movie lovers, and even for the average moviegoer. Boyle's style of filmmaking is not something that I've ever liked, but I have to admit that the movie itself was pretty good. It is a razor sharp attack on the government, AND a terrifying zombie movie. But style aside, Boyle knows how to make movies work, and this one definitely does.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
BritishWolfSep 21, 2015
The film that first used running 'zombies' and kick-started the modern obsession with all things undead, 28 Days Later is a masterpiece. Eloquently shot and put together with an eerie and memorable musical score set this film apart from theThe film that first used running 'zombies' and kick-started the modern obsession with all things undead, 28 Days Later is a masterpiece. Eloquently shot and put together with an eerie and memorable musical score set this film apart from the average zombie flick. The focus on human drama and the critique on the nature of humanity was also a rather unique take in an overused, over-saturated genre.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
PanchogulMay 25, 2020
Brillante de pies a cabeza, una aventura cargada de tensión, carisma y acción.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
sjultiDec 7, 2016
This is a great zombie flick, its much slower than the second one but that one of the best things about this movie it gives itself time to flesh out the main characters.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Rcavey92212Mar 17, 2020
Danny Boyle (Trainspotting) still refuses to call this a horror film and went with eco thriller amongst others. But the rest of us know one when we see one and this film is a big one. Sexy and nude Cillian Murphy (Batman Begins) stars as JimDanny Boyle (Trainspotting) still refuses to call this a horror film and went with eco thriller amongst others. But the rest of us know one when we see one and this film is a big one. Sexy and nude Cillian Murphy (Batman Begins) stars as Jim a young man whom awakes out of a coma after a pandemic and discovers that most of the survivors left are infected with a rage virus which drives them crazy and drives them to attack and infect others. The plot is quite similar to so many. Mostly like every zombie movie ever made. Along the way he meets some survivors which include a truly bad ass Naomie Harris (Pirates of the Carribean 2&3) and they try and find help. A radio broadcast leads them to a group of soldiers with questionable intentions. There's nothing really new here plot wise but the execution is creatively stunning. The grainy, sort if found footage style easily immerses you into the events on screen and it's both terrifying and addictive. The movie is also emotionally effective because the characters and their plight are well developed. Despite the director's intentions the horror community has claimed the film as one of our own and it's undoubtedly worth celebrating.

Budget: $5m
Domestic Box Office: $45m
Worldwide Box Office: $83m

4.5/5… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
HellHoleHorrorFeb 15, 2022
Danny Boyle at his best. A great story well told with plenty of violence and great movie imagery. One of my favourite films ever with one of the most enticing trailers that I have ever seen. It is essentially a zombie film but there is soDanny Boyle at his best. A great story well told with plenty of violence and great movie imagery. One of my favourite films ever with one of the most enticing trailers that I have ever seen. It is essentially a zombie film but there is so much more intelligence compared to your average gore infested zombie flick. This is thoughtful, provoking, clever and overall an amazing film throughout. Only minor criticisms come from the occasionally scrappy looking digital film used and some niggling continuity errors. Very minor things to bring down this horror classic. Easily the most exciting and cleverest zombie film ever.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JoshuaW.Jun 30, 2003
[***Potential Spoilers***] 28 Days Later is the best film I've seen yet this summer. The acting, writing, cinematography, music were all top notch. As a horror film this one is a one of a kind. Its real ability to scare its audience has[***Potential Spoilers***] 28 Days Later is the best film I've seen yet this summer. The acting, writing, cinematography, music were all top notch. As a horror film this one is a one of a kind. Its real ability to scare its audience has little to do with typical horror movie conventions, although it does manage a moment here and there, such as the church scene (especially the moment when ..... [reference deleted]). However, this film's perspective on human nature is where it achieves the most scares. From the well meaning animal rights group in the beginning of the film to Jim's rampage at its end (which has entered into my all time favorite movie scenes), no one in this film is free of sin, an inherently violent nature or accountability for their actions. The Rage disease is just a medium for human nature to act out it's most primal inclinations, which seems to be aimed at harming other human beings. The third section of the film which takes place at a manor house under the "protection" of a small military group only confirms these tendancies. The soldiers actions towards our heroes (especially the women) drives home the idea that humans don't need to necessarily be infected with Rage to canabalize upon each other. … Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
KeetonJ.May 12, 2007
This movie is more than a zombie horror flick if you ask me. It really revolutionized the apocalyptic thriller in many places. It's much more fast-paced in that the "zombies" if you will, don't hobble after you and moan. They This movie is more than a zombie horror flick if you ask me. It really revolutionized the apocalyptic thriller in many places. It's much more fast-paced in that the "zombies" if you will, don't hobble after you and moan. They sprint and the chances of survival are much less. There's also an eerie feeling a claustrophobia at the beginning of the movie, even though the main character is out in the open with London to himself. It also creates characters that you begin to love, and hate. There's a thing about how people killing people is how it's always been and that they're in a state of normality even with the crazies running around. One of my favorite horror/thrillers I've seen, and I can't wait to see the sequel.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RD.May 28, 2007
Very good zombie movie. Scary in parts and has a good social commentary.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
FaisalH.Sep 18, 2007
A new take on the zombie genre, and a very successful one. 28 Days Later is a great movie, from its unique storyline, beautiful camera-angles, and well-written characters, the film's greatest strength is the fact that the characters A new take on the zombie genre, and a very successful one. 28 Days Later is a great movie, from its unique storyline, beautiful camera-angles, and well-written characters, the film's greatest strength is the fact that the characters involved are so human, unlike the superhero characters you might have seen in other movies like Resident Evil, these characters behave in ways we would have in situations like these, so it is easy to attach to them. The only flaw in the film is that it loses some of it's strengths in the second half for a while, but that can easily be overlooked considering what a quality product 28 Days Later is. Recommended for any horror movie fan who wants to see something different than the usual shoot-em-up.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AndrewS.Jan 29, 2004
Great!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WillJun 27, 2006
28 Days Later remains my favorite movie of all time. Not only does it have some of the most amazing camera angles and artistic shots, It's intensity is absolutely unmatched. Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris are simply superb as well. 28 Days Later remains my favorite movie of all time. Not only does it have some of the most amazing camera angles and artistic shots, It's intensity is absolutely unmatched. Cillian Murphy and Naomie Harris are simply superb as well. Many people who see this movie fail to understand that it's not just a stupid zombie flick. 28 days later is far more; it's an intelligent study of the human psyche and how we're mentally affected by danger. The cinematography in 28 days later is equally impressive; the colors and filtering used in the camera work are nothing short of breathtaking. If you have any interest in horror movies, or for that matter movies at all you owe it to yourself to immediately rent or (preferably) buy 28 days later.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChrisW.Jul 28, 2006
Gripping all the way through. Very dark and interesting movie. Well made for a film on a small budget. Thought the ending was a bit pox as it really did not answer many questions.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AliciaO.Mar 15, 2007
This movie is so much more than just some horror flick. It delves deep into the human mind and shows us what we are really fighting in the world today, human nature. The change from man against beast to man against man was magnificent, and This movie is so much more than just some horror flick. It delves deep into the human mind and shows us what we are really fighting in the world today, human nature. The change from man against beast to man against man was magnificent, and really showed the underlying theme of the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DaveM.May 15, 2007
The greatest zombie movie ever. It is fast paced throughout the whole entire movie that leads up to a very exciting climax.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AbbylJun 28, 2007
This movie had an overall good plot and a good cast, some parts to me were unreal, and other parts were filled with unneeded gore. But overall this movie was very satisfying.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
NickA.Aug 20, 2007
Shocking realism and some of the genre's most horrifying shots in recent years are captured perfectly by Boyle, who succeeds in creating genuine fear from the base of one of humanity's most elemental anxieties -- that which can Shocking realism and some of the genre's most horrifying shots in recent years are captured perfectly by Boyle, who succeeds in creating genuine fear from the base of one of humanity's most elemental anxieties -- that which can tear a city such as London to the bare; the fear of an unknown viral pandemic. Released when it was, Boyle's already horror classic tackled this global nightmare precisely when it was to be most effective; as SARS was striking on high abroad and America was on alert to prevent any cases of its own. '28 Days Later' is unrelenting horror cinema that first stunned England, and then created an epidemic of fear in the States. This film is quite possibly the most intellectually ripe … Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
KevinY.Nov 14, 2005
Good movie. Oh my the way for some of you idiots out there who think it's a zombie movie and are compairing it to classics like Romero's stuff, I have some news for ya: THEY ARN'T ZOMBIES FOR GOD'S SAKE! Stop calling them Good movie. Oh my the way for some of you idiots out there who think it's a zombie movie and are compairing it to classics like Romero's stuff, I have some news for ya: THEY ARN'T ZOMBIES FOR GOD'S SAKE! Stop calling them zombies! The director even said, "This is not a zombie movie....". He said it himself! Ok I'm done.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
CliffS.Nov 2, 2006
Good storytelling, but some painfully stupid plot lapses. For example, there are electric lights when needed, the infected never attack each other, and the whole episode with the army is completely implausible. Smart money says, stop the DVD Good storytelling, but some painfully stupid plot lapses. For example, there are electric lights when needed, the infected never attack each other, and the whole episode with the army is completely implausible. Smart money says, stop the DVD after they dinner with the army chaps.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
WadeV.Mar 19, 2006
this movie is a return to the under-produced, anti-special effects crap that Hollywood has become clogged up with. Its a real ,believable & so enthralling look at metaphors,alternate meanings &ultimately survival of the human race. Superb this movie is a return to the under-produced, anti-special effects crap that Hollywood has become clogged up with. Its a real ,believable & so enthralling look at metaphors,alternate meanings &ultimately survival of the human race. Superb acting,fresh faces & a gripping story line will leave you breathless!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MattMcLovinAug 22, 2007
Awesomely made. 28 Days Later kicked major ass with a kick ass ending. Greatest infected person movie. Blows away the 2nd.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NeelyryMar 21, 2015
The best zombie movie I have ever seen. It was good enough to merit a sequel, 28 weeks later, which is also amazing. Those two and dawn of the dead really are the best zombie movies out there.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
iamtrent424Apr 10, 2013
This movie was outstanding it has a very strong political message and it is very well structure Love the directing style for this film. David Boyle did an outstanding jib with directing it. The cast is good but the only problem is it mightThis movie was outstanding it has a very strong political message and it is very well structure Love the directing style for this film. David Boyle did an outstanding jib with directing it. The cast is good but the only problem is it might be boring to some people. Overall this film is one of my favorite zombie films, its different this movie isn't supposed to be action pack, this is the beginning of the zombie apocalypse. I love the multiply cam shots in the streets. You should watch this film if you like good movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TheQuietGamerMar 6, 2011
This is the best zombie movie I've seen so far, it has great characters, plot, acting, and feel to it, while watching you feel like there is no hope for the characters, which makes them all the more enjoyable, a must see not just for zombieThis is the best zombie movie I've seen so far, it has great characters, plot, acting, and feel to it, while watching you feel like there is no hope for the characters, which makes them all the more enjoyable, a must see not just for zombie fans, but for fans of amazingly well made movies, every bit deserving of a perfect 10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
juliankleissJan 7, 2011
The film explores the human's most basic needs and instincts. Among them are, the fight for one's individual survival at all costs, and the need for a perspective on the future of humankind, even if that would lead to detaining and raping theThe film explores the human's most basic needs and instincts. Among them are, the fight for one's individual survival at all costs, and the need for a perspective on the future of humankind, even if that would lead to detaining and raping the last few women. Interstingly, one of the characters in the movie claims that people have killed each other since the birth of humankind, and that therafter nothing has changed since the arrival of zombies. This claim is open for interpretation and might imply that our kind's rage against one another will eventually lead to our own apocalypse. Another character suggests that due to the short time men have inhabitated Earth, the world will go back to normalcy after the extinction of the humans. Nevertheless, the movie is by far not nihilistic, but also claims that love for one another is our most important need, and therefore gives life a purpose even in the most dire situations. A great, and at times intense, low budget movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrRiggsJan 9, 2011
When I first heard about this movie I was pumped. I can NEVER get enough quality zombie/infection type movies if they are well done, and this is WELL done. Acting is solid, the effects/costumes/blood/gore as all very believable, some partsWhen I first heard about this movie I was pumped. I can NEVER get enough quality zombie/infection type movies if they are well done, and this is WELL done. Acting is solid, the effects/costumes/blood/gore as all very believable, some parts will get you angry tho and thats what I love about movies, some parts you just want to reach through the screen, kept my involved and entertained throughout, same as 28 weeks later, BOTH quality infection/plague flicks that are a must watch for anyone a fan of those things. I wish theyd make more like this...!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
candtJun 11, 2011
I really enjoyed this! I liked the characters, and the acting was good. There wasn't quite enough gore for a zombie/apocalypse movie, but it was pretty intense just the same. The music was fantastic, and fit perfectly with what was going on.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
BillyFeb 3, 2011
This was a great zombie movie ... I enjoyed the dynamic between the heroes and the twists that caused even more stress between the actors. One of my favorite zombie movies ever.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HalfwelshmanNov 3, 2011
Danny Boyle's post-modern zombie flick is quite rightly acclaimed. It's tense, scary and thoroughly British. You follow a group of well-developed characters that you actually care about (a rarity for a horror film) and you genuinely feel forDanny Boyle's post-modern zombie flick is quite rightly acclaimed. It's tense, scary and thoroughly British. You follow a group of well-developed characters that you actually care about (a rarity for a horror film) and you genuinely feel for their plight. The real strength of 28 Days is its use of contrast in tone - Boyle gives you a good scare, then gradually lulls you into a false sense of security again with an extended period of calm, making the next scare all the more shocking. The middle act of the film essentially resembles a jolly family road trip, making the jet-black finale all the more disturbing. Boyle has plenty of opportunity to show off as a director, and with some arty cinematography and rapid-fire editing, he continues to prove himself to be a true artisan. The crowning jewel of 28 Days Later is definitely the finale, which is a dazzling stylish sequence that evolves into something you'd never see in a mainstream Hollywood horror film. With some great performances, loads of scares and bucket-loads of style, 28 Days Later is a truly spectacular alternative British horror film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ZiggyStardustJul 3, 2011
One of the very few zombie or horror films that are actually scary and suck you in into a post-apocalyptic world where you are helpless and scared to death.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Potter17Sep 4, 2011
I think "28 Days Later" is, as critics use to say, an "emotionally satisfying" story. A thrilling film stuffed with action-packed scenes and good acting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JoseRochaPTOct 3, 2011
The continuation of a great movie, no doubt loved to see the continuation that, fortunately, and unlike many sequels was not a copy of the first, a film is quite rich in terms of history and everything else, with new images, new scenes, and aThe continuation of a great movie, no doubt loved to see the continuation that, fortunately, and unlike many sequels was not a copy of the first, a film is quite rich in terms of history and everything else, with new images, new scenes, and a completely worthy of a zombie film. I liked it, really. And it's pretty rare to me enjoying a movie, but just the story itself got my attention.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
hoops2448Nov 2, 2011
I sound like a broken record at the moment because yet again 28 Days later is a film of two halves. the first is slow but does build the characters in a way that makes the latter half pack an emotional punch as well as a visceral one.

TheI sound like a broken record at the moment because yet again 28 Days later is a film of two halves. the first is slow but does build the characters in a way that makes the latter half pack an emotional punch as well as a visceral one.

The 2nd half of 28 Days is just so good you can excuse the slow nature of the first 45 minutes even if it does serve a purpose towards the end. However the best thing about 28 Days Later is its a film making a point but it never feels heavy handed or as if its being force fed to you. The idea that the real monsters are the humans is a point made by Danny Boyle so adeptly that the film leaves you thinking at the end about society now and what would happen in a national emergency (at least, I did). The direction is also incredibly ambitious despite the limited budget (which unfortunately is incredibly noticeable) with shots including empty streets surrounding Westminster and the houses of parliament being extremely prolific and inspired. The cast of Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, Brendan Gleeson and Megan Burns work well together and all give great performances, especially Gleeson as someone holding onto hope for the sake of his daughter. The final 20 minutes of the film is a fine example of how all films should end with the film culminating in an incredibly tense action set piece that provides genuine chills and scares while also shocking you to your core. Its a thrilling film which may take some getting into but by the end it is well worth it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Tss5078Feb 23, 2013
28 Days Later is the brain child of Director Danny Boyle, who has might quite a name for himself over the last few years. It is also another post apocalyptic film that plays into people's fear of the end of the world. Most of these movies28 Days Later is the brain child of Director Danny Boyle, who has might quite a name for himself over the last few years. It is also another post apocalyptic film that plays into people's fear of the end of the world. Most of these movies suck, but Boyle knew this and made sure his movie didn't. 28 Days Later follows the life of a survivor (Cillian Murphy) who wakes up in an empty hospital after an accident. He has no idea what's going on, but soon learns the horrible truth. Boyle decide to film the movie as if he were following this stranger from a distance, with an outdated camcorder. It gives the movie a grainy, dark, 70's style and fits right into the story. Cillian Murphy is great in his first leading role and you can see why he's now a name in Hollywood. Overall, it's pretty bloody and predictable, but defiantly not your typical end of the world film. The acting is top notch and the way it was filmed and directed make it something special.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RegOzFeb 5, 2012
I think it is a very good movie for its genre. It was gripping, smart, and yeah...somehow realistic if situated in the right context. Virus, epidemies, all that can happen, we just never think that would happen to us, these days in our world.I think it is a very good movie for its genre. It was gripping, smart, and yeah...somehow realistic if situated in the right context. Virus, epidemies, all that can happen, we just never think that would happen to us, these days in our world. It is a movie where values are tested, so are relationships. There is gore, but I don't think it is unnecessary. I didn't like the fact that Mark gets killed so early in the movie...I would have loved to know more about his character, which seemed pretty nice. There was room for improvement and there could have been a better argument about the use that 'women' had for the army guys. Just lust? what about a different approach..survival and preservation of the specie? I mean, at this point the movie turned a bit basic. I expected a more elaborated argument here for it could have become even more profound what was somehow wasted. this part of the movie is indeed, stereotypical but overall it was a film I enjoyed a lot. One thing I found really silly is not the movie, but comments/question I have read in other sites about why 'Frank left his credit card if that could have been of use, later?', c'mon,wasn't it a clearly sarcastic gesture related to the fact that money -given the circumstances- can be of not value at all? What kind of movie people that make those stupid remarks were watching? Keeping money, or a credit card to 'bribe someone' when the whole country is wiped out and the characters are permanently saying how money is totally useless? Quite honestly, questions or arguments like that used to criticize this movie make me feel sorry for some people's IQ...!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
PrimalHunter70Aug 25, 2012
28 Days Later is quite simply one of, if not the best, zombie movies I have ever seen. The characters are well developed and fleshed out, and you really feel for them and hope they do survive. The film is violent, but doesn't go out of its28 Days Later is quite simply one of, if not the best, zombie movies I have ever seen. The characters are well developed and fleshed out, and you really feel for them and hope they do survive. The film is violent, but doesn't go out of its way to be violent, rather than being non-stop graphic violence. And the story is actually semi-believable, the infected aren't dead bodies risen from the dead, they are living people infected with a deadly incurable virus. I highly recommend this movie, extremely good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
potatoes351Aug 13, 2012
Danny Boyle is and has been Britain's best director since his ballsy masterpiece Trainspotting. Now he brings us 28 Days Later. The story of a man named Jim who awakes from a coma 28 days after a virus known as Rage has contaminated the GreatDanny Boyle is and has been Britain's best director since his ballsy masterpiece Trainspotting. Now he brings us 28 Days Later. The story of a man named Jim who awakes from a coma 28 days after a virus known as Rage has contaminated the Great British public. Along his way Jim makes new friends, realises that not even humans can be trusted in the end of the world and what precautions are really being put in place to ensure the virus doesn't leave England.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ILHMFeb 2, 2013
The Rage virus has wiped out nearly all of England, turning its infected into murderous killers driven only by their need to feed. Now, a handful of unlucky survivors are left to find an escape from the nationwide pandemic. In 2002, DannyThe Rage virus has wiped out nearly all of England, turning its infected into murderous killers driven only by their need to feed. Now, a handful of unlucky survivors are left to find an escape from the nationwide pandemic. In 2002, Danny Boyle shook the Horror genre with a refreshing new thriller that redefined the zombie movie and terrified audiences around the world. 28 DAYS LATER offers a nihilistic world view in which humanity is the ultimate villain. Man's attempt to dissect and control nature is what caused the deadly virus, and while the infected mindlessly attack out of the primal need to feed, it is the living characters that kill out of fear, paranoia, and selfish desire. As best portrayed by the corrupted band of soldiers in the end of the film, it is darkest human emotions that drive home the suspense in 28 DAYS LATER, with the added horror of infected flesh-eaters running in the streets. The infected are unlike any of the undead that we have ever seen before. They are fast and ferocious, bursting through windows and tearing into their victims with a shocking speed. This would become a popular trend in the zombie films to follow, the most notable example being Zack Synder's frightening update to the Horror classic DAWN OF THE DEAD. Boyle's decision to shoot 28 DAYS LATER on a digital camera delivers a grim sense of reality, which is darkened even further by the dreary score. He also creates one of the defining moments in recent Horror as Jim walks aimlessly through the deserted streets of London. 28 DAYS LATER has a devastating effect on the viewer, and has proven to be one of the best films from the 2000's.

-Carl Manes
I Like Horror Movies… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
GodotIsW8ing4UJan 12, 2013
While the plot never even considers throwing the viewer any curve balls, the film shines on its unparalleled ability to set atmosphere, its talented actors, and its excellent dialogue. The overwhelming element of this film is fear; it's whatWhile the plot never even considers throwing the viewer any curve balls, the film shines on its unparalleled ability to set atmosphere, its talented actors, and its excellent dialogue. The overwhelming element of this film is fear; it's what drives both the protagonist and the antagonists, and it's what this film almost perfectly instills in its audience. The expert cinematography and music very much make this movie what it is, hitting and emphasizing every emotional note perfectly.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MonsieurEamesJan 23, 2013
Although I thought the movie was great, it didn't actually scare me all that much. It was more of a thriller than it was a horror film. What really got me was the sheer brutality of it all, The ending was somewhat disappointing, but it can beAlthough I thought the movie was great, it didn't actually scare me all that much. It was more of a thriller than it was a horror film. What really got me was the sheer brutality of it all, The ending was somewhat disappointing, but it can be overlooked.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SpangleJun 24, 2016
28 Days Later is bloody brilliant. Decidedly British and early 2000s in its look, director Danny Boyle once more conjures up a film that equal parts disorienting, unsettling, and horrifying. Honestly, it reminds me a lot of Trainspotting in28 Days Later is bloody brilliant. Decidedly British and early 2000s in its look, director Danny Boyle once more conjures up a film that equal parts disorienting, unsettling, and horrifying. Honestly, it reminds me a lot of Trainspotting in the sheer terror it can create and the general atmosphere of hopelessness. Some call this an astute political allegory, but if the only element of that is that scientific experimentation will eventually bite us in the ass and lead to the demise of us all, then it is hardly profound. Despite that, it is an undeniably smartly crafted sci-fi horror film. Really, the film has far more to say on the front that nobody can be trusted in times of danger, especially those entrusted to protect you. With fantastic zombie design and fantastic pacing, 28 Days Later is a thoroughly scary and unsettling horror film that packs a punch emotionally and will leave you entirely on edge.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Compi24Jan 27, 2016
Simply one of the greatest zombie movies ever made and not even because of the zombies themselves. "28 Days Later" ranks higher than most zombie movies because it's much more than just a "zombie film." It's a beautiful testament to theSimply one of the greatest zombie movies ever made and not even because of the zombies themselves. "28 Days Later" ranks higher than most zombie movies because it's much more than just a "zombie film." It's a beautiful testament to the impressive power of making a creative movie on a dime. It's a fascinating sociopolitical commentary, filled to the brim with moral conundrums. It's a thrilling adventure filled with unexpected twists and brilliant nods to other horror films cut from the same cloth. But, most importantly, "28 Days Later" is a superior zombie film, because the zombies aren't even the main threat throughout. Indeed, humanity and despair are the true antagonists of this film. It has a heart and a mind and it's not afraid to show them both. Really, really commendable stuff here from everyone involved.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SwatiMar 30, 2013
Definitely the best zombie movie ever. A true masterpiece. Deals more with human emotions related to survival instead of resorting to gore and violence. Only when you hold it in comparison against other zombie movies that you realize howDefinitely the best zombie movie ever. A true masterpiece. Deals more with human emotions related to survival instead of resorting to gore and violence. Only when you hold it in comparison against other zombie movies that you realize how genuine and thought provoking this movie was.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
mbeckfordOct 28, 2020
One of the best zombie movies ever made with many of the genre's "firsts:" 1. The first that begins with an actual explanation of what created the zombie plague. 2. The first to introduce a fast-moving "infected" horde, ratching up theOne of the best zombie movies ever made with many of the genre's "firsts:" 1. The first that begins with an actual explanation of what created the zombie plague. 2. The first to introduce a fast-moving "infected" horde, ratching up the tension significantly. 3. The first to infect people instantly (within seconds). It also has one of the best movie scores, one that rivals those from John Carpenter classics "Halloween" and "The Thing." It is striking how the music can elevate a movie or a scene. The biggest issue, which to be fair, is not something Danny Boyle and his crew could have foreseen, is that it was shot in low quality SD, making it nearly unwatchable on large screen modern HD or 4K TV's.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
gracjanskiMar 3, 2021
Very low budget movie, especially with a low quality camera. The story is so classic, that everyone should have watch it already some times. In addition the story has many logical holes. So what is the point to watch this movie? I dont know.Very low budget movie, especially with a low quality camera. The story is so classic, that everyone should have watch it already some times. In addition the story has many logical holes. So what is the point to watch this movie? I dont know. I didnt the fast edit of the action scenes also.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Meth-dudeJun 10, 2015
This is a really good zombie film.Even if the sequel was for me, better than this version,this movie was really good.A lot of gore,good acting and well made action sequences were the forces of the movie.Cillian Murphy was really good in his role too.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TejasNairMar 18, 2020
Save for the final 20 minutes that leads up to a convenient climax and a slightly different turn in its otherwise hackneyed plot, 28 Days Later... disappointed me with its rock music picturised on zombie apocalypse that follows a group ofSave for the final 20 minutes that leads up to a convenient climax and a slightly different turn in its otherwise hackneyed plot, 28 Days Later... disappointed me with its rock music picturised on zombie apocalypse that follows a group of survivors as in every survival film, especially after having watched it 18 years later. TN.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SiAScORCHNov 5, 2014
This movie is awesome, and the only thing that stopped me from rating it a 10 was the lack of special effects. I think it could of been much better in that department, but aside from that the movie was brilliant. It had some good acting andThis movie is awesome, and the only thing that stopped me from rating it a 10 was the lack of special effects. I think it could of been much better in that department, but aside from that the movie was brilliant. It had some good acting and kept you on your seat for most of the movie because you never knew what to expect. I know at times when I saw the zombies coming I would get into the movie and get on the edge of my seat and I'd be saying: RUN! So it does capture the audience watching it and it's worth watching.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SnowwDec 16, 2014
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is a very emotion filled zombie story, and is quite amazing. These aren't just movies, they have a bit of truth to them. It show's that our government wouldn't give a flying f*ck if something like this were to happen. This movie though, was so sad at points, yet so happy. And the happy end made it all worth it. It is a MASTERPIECE worth checking out. Definitely rent/watch/buy it if you get the chance! It was very sad when they killed Mark (the british guy with Selena) and when they killed Frank (Hannah's dad) Frank could've avoided being killed by not kicking the post with the dead body on top.. He was asking for infected blood to get in his eye. Definitely a WONDERFUL movie! I loved it, one of the BEST yet! And definitely on my personal Top 20 Movies List… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MovieManiac83Apr 25, 2015
The end of the world has always simultaneously fascinated and repulsed human beings. No less an authority than the Bible devotes entire books to the last days. And, since almost the beginning of science fiction, the apocalypse has been aThe end of the world has always simultaneously fascinated and repulsed human beings. No less an authority than the Bible devotes entire books to the last days. And, since almost the beginning of science fiction, the apocalypse has been a popular subject. In fact, one of the most common science fiction subgenres (which gained popularity during the early Cold War era of the 1950s) is that of the post-apocalyptic survivor - an individual who lives through some kind of catastrophe (often a nuclear war) and must make his way through the hostile environment that exists in its wake.

Danny Boyle, the director of Shallow Grave and Trainspotting, has brought his off-center perspective to this story. Armed with a screenplay written by Alex Garland, Boyle's vision of humanity's twilight has mankind wiped out not by fire, brimstone, and nuclear fallout, but by disease. The living are divided into two categories: the infected, who are more like mindless zombies than human beings, and the survivalists, who eschew making plans, realizing that "staying alive is as good as it gets." The allegorical nature of the movie is impossible to miss. And Boyle touches upon such potentially weighty matters as the fundamental difference between man and beast, and whether human beings are natural killers.

The first half of 28 Days Later is a road movie, as Jim and his companions make their way from London to Manchester using deserted highways and facing nearly constant attacks from roving bands of the infected. The second half is a more straightforward action/adventure. The film contains one significant twist, and Boyle adeptly blends elements of horror and drama with the science fiction. In fact, one of the things that sets this movie apart from many similar cinematic endeavors is its focus on characters rather than action. The movie develops Jim, Selena, Frank, and Hannah into believable individuals. The situation is crafted in a way that seems almost plausible, and, once it establishes the rules, never cheats. The film's "villains" have credible reasons for acting as they do, and the ending doesn't feel cheap or false.

When Boyle wants to shock us, he has no trouble doing so. There's a little of George A. Romero (Night of the Living Dead) here. Several scenes in which the infected attack are genuinely creepy. One sequence in particular - in which Jim and Frank race to change a tire while a band of infected relentlessly approach - generates as much tension as any other 2003 motion picture. This is followed in short order by an effective character building sequence in which the protagonists enjoy a picnic while ruminating about what, if anything, the future might hold. Suddenly, Jim and Selena have become aware that the mantra of "just survive" is not enough.

I enjoyed 28 Days Later, although I would be the first to admit that it doesn't do much that's radical. It's better than most post-apocalypse stories because it cares as much about the characters and their circumstances as with developing battles and action sequences. Three of the primary actors - Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, and Megan Burns - are mostly unknown on this side of the Atlantic. The two recognizable faces - Brendan Gleeson and Christopher Eccleston - are character actors, not stars. Yet, perhaps because of the relative anonymity of the performers, the ensemble works.

28 Days Later is dark, the video quality is dubious (it was shot on digital video to curtail cost and provide a grittier look), and the subject matter is familiar. But the filmmakers counter these questionable qualities with solid performances, an intelligent script, and sure-handed direction. The result is a movie that kept me involved from start to finish.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
intelligentsia2May 22, 2015
Very good movie. Didn't enjoy the cinematography or some of the shaky camerawork. The character development was excellent. I found this to be a still fresh take on a zombie movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BerlioriusJul 26, 2015
All I was hoping for was a film with a compelling premise and some good scares. However, this film utterly surprised me, slipping in to my top 10 all-time favorites by transcending the expectations of the genre. I'm generally averse toAll I was hoping for was a film with a compelling premise and some good scares. However, this film utterly surprised me, slipping in to my top 10 all-time favorites by transcending the expectations of the genre. I'm generally averse to throwing superlatives around when discussing film, but this one earned them.

It's less a traditional horror film than a horror-draped survivor's tale, and it's more human and more haunting than most films I've seen in any genre. It's impeccably filmed and edited. With both slow-burning, stark frames and frantic close-ups, it's use of camera to tell the story is masterful, never intrusive. Same with the marriage of image and soundtrack here. It's among the best I've ever experienced. The dialogue is naturalistic, without action flick, comic book stingers (Hey! But I love comics!) and conveys the stress, the fear, the desperation, the hopelessness of real people in an unreal situation. The acting, too, is superb! Cillian Murphy, as Jim, put in a performance that ranks among the very best I've ever seen on film. I've since seen him in numerous roles. He's fantastically talented, but 28 Days is still my favorite. One element that sets it apart from most horror is the pacing. This one takes time to establish an aura, an ambiance. It takes time to breathe. Rather than merely dampening intensity, it often builds it, making the characters and their interactions richer, and ultimately instilling a horror that's much more real and horrific.

The more vaunted sequel, 28 Weeks Later, is the energetic younger brother, a straight-ahead-horror-flick with uptempo pacing and loads of action. It's quite well done and succeeds on its own merits, but to this viewer, it's clearly the inferior film. 28 Weeks was a mainstream thrill ride that delivered, but it's ultimately forgettable, like most of the mainstream films I see. The original, on the other hand, is a haunting experience that's stayed with me for nearly a decade since I first saw it.

28 Days Later offers a rare, deeply felt and intense experience that makes it stand out as a great film. Consider further that it's rooted in the horror genre, and you'll realize how truly exceptional it is.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JasonCDanielsNov 16, 2015
This was a fun, novel, entry into the oft maligned horror subgenre of "zombie films." This movie grips the viewer from the start with a scene showing how the Rage virus (virus responsible for the zombies) gets loose, and then proceeds to showThis was a fun, novel, entry into the oft maligned horror subgenre of "zombie films." This movie grips the viewer from the start with a scene showing how the Rage virus (virus responsible for the zombies) gets loose, and then proceeds to show us Jim, the protagonist, as he wakes in a hospital after the apparent fall of civilization and his struggles to survive in this harsh setting. It attempts to answer the questions of how might a variety of people survive? Just how ugly could survivor camps get in just 28 days after the fall? And what hope, if any, might there be in this situation?

The story lets the viewer develop attachments to characters and delivers some heart-ache along the way, which adds to the story and tension. (more if you watch the directors cut) It does suffer from logical inconsistencies at times, even given the rules previously set out by the story, sometimes breaking suspension of disbelief. These missteps are largely forgivable due to good acting, good special effects, a fun and largely plausible story -- given the implausible (zombie) premise -- topped off with great directing and good camera work.

This movie is definitely worth watching if you like horror films that are more than just splatter-punk/torture films. If you don't, give this movie a pass you likely won't enjoy it. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie despite some of the rough patches. It's a solid 7 of 10.

----------------------------
Notes on the subgenre
----------------------------
Why is it a zombie film?
1. It's a "zombie film" for this reason alone: It's a movie in which people become mindless, relatively immune to damage, pain...etc. and arguably cannibalistic and violent toward regular humans after getting exposed intimately to the already afflicted (bite, blood, other bodily fluids). The mechanism of becoming a zombie (fungi, virus, voodoo, radiation, god/magic/chemicals/unknown forces raising bodies from the dead) is secondary.

2. As a result: this movie checks the main boxes for the present day popular concept of the term "zombie." That's all it needs for inclusion into the subgenre of "zombie fiction."

3. And while one could make the argument that these aren't zombies in the so-called proper "raised from the dead" sense, one would miss the fact that the origin of the term is from voodoo, and those zombies don't die before becoming mindless, and are largely passive and obedient slaves to the Bocor who made them.

4. For a historical frame of reference Voodoo legends, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Herbert West: Reanimator by H.P. Lovecraft (short story), The Book of Revelations from The Bible ...etc. all give very different accounts of what these creatures we now, largely, classify as zombies are like. Some of it is very unlike and more far more nuanced than current popular zombie fiction. This means people can usually find and cherry pick historical items that support their own belief that some certain work isn't in fact about zombies.

5. Such is the way of definitional pedantry. Anyone with sufficient knowledge on the history of a subject, and a very strong opinion can do it, instead of actually paying attention to all of the facts on how a term has changed through time, and what it means today.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
zombiefanaticMar 13, 2016
This remains one of the greatest zombie films ever made. The acting, directing, cinematography and raw fear produced are unmatched by a vast majority of zombie films. Furthermore the style of film and choice of camera make the film seem lessThis remains one of the greatest zombie films ever made. The acting, directing, cinematography and raw fear produced are unmatched by a vast majority of zombie films. Furthermore the style of film and choice of camera make the film seem less like a film and more like reality—a goal that most zombie movies have but rarely accomplish.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TheFilmDoctorMar 22, 2016
The single great ass-kick of last summer — and the only film of the year to leave you that true action-movie smeared-on-the-inside feeling of having lived through something. Four survivors of an epidemic flee an England overrun by howling,The single great ass-kick of last summer — and the only film of the year to leave you that true action-movie smeared-on-the-inside feeling of having lived through something. Four survivors of an epidemic flee an England overrun by howling, scampering zombies. The story poses essential questions of what "survival" actually means (and then answers them: It means not being devoured by **** crazed zombies). Disc extras are mostly serviceable: The commentary track fills its cultural function of being a repository for transient factoids ("Chimps can only act to age seven") and filmmaking-on-the-fly tips ("Paper drifting through a shot is always a good, cheap way of suggesting an apocalypse"). The supposedly tougher endings boil down to whether the hero lives, and a crap featurette consists of qualified medical doctors being encouraged to agree, "Yes, this could legitimately happen." So switch it all off and just watch what happens to be the best post-9/11 movie yet.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieMasterEddyApr 2, 2016
When ''28 Days Later'' is not scaring you silly, it invites you to reflect seriously on the fragility of modern civilization, which has been swept away by a gruesome and highly contagious virus while the hero lies peacefully in a coma. FourWhen ''28 Days Later'' is not scaring you silly, it invites you to reflect seriously on the fragility of modern civilization, which has been swept away by a gruesome and highly contagious virus while the hero lies peacefully in a coma. Four weeks after a laboratory full of rage-infected monkeys has been liberated by some tragically misguided animal rights militants, the whole of London -- and possibly every place else -- has been substantially depopulated. The churches and alleyways are littered with corpses, and fast-moving, red-eyed ''infecteds'' roam the streets looking for prey. Even the rats flee from them, and the few healthy humans face a Hobbesian battle for survival.

But what is most striking, and most chilling, about the early scenes of this post-apocalyptic horror show, directed by Danny Boyle and written by Alex Garland, is the eerie, echoing emptiness. Stumbling out of his hospital bed, Jim (Cillian Murphy), a former bike messenger, encounters a familiar metropolis that has been almost entirely stripped of life. Postcard images of the Thames, London Bridge and the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral take on a lurid, funereal glow. After centuries of bustle and enterprise, what remain are vacant buildings, overturned double-decker buses, looted vending machines and cheap souvenir replicas of Big Ben scattered across the sidewalk.

In their previous collaboration, ''The Beach,'' Mr. Boyle and Mr. Garland tried to imagine how a small group of people, removed from the modern world, might reconstitute society from scratch, an experiment whose failure seemed preordained for both the characters and the filmmakers. Here, working with a more solid premise, a smaller budget and greater freedom (and without big movie stars), they probe a similar theme more persuasively.

Jim, it turns out, is not entirely alone. Before long, he and some other survivors -- a prickly loner named Selena (Naomie Harris); an affable dad, Frank (Brendan Gleeson); and Frank's adolescent daughter, Hannah (Megan Burns) -- have formed a tiny band of nomads, traveling the English countryside in a big, black taxi and discovering that caring for one another is not just a residue of extinct social norms, but also an expression of the survival instinct.

Other expressions, as you might expect, are not so inspiring. Through the silence comes a radio signal, a voice promising that salvation and the answer to the virus lie with a group of soldiers just north of Manchester. They are led by Maj. Henry West (Christopher Eccleston), who seems to have graduated from a ''Lord of the Flies'' military academy. He and his men are on hand to demonstrate that those who offer protection and security can be even more dangerous than the virus-crazed zombies they keep at bay.

The soldiers also allow Mr. Garland and Mr. Boyle an exit from nightmarish claustrophobia into a more conventional (though still quite effective) action-and-suspense story. As such, and as a parable of human nature under extreme duress, ''28 Days Later'' is never less than interesting and acknowledges fairly directly its debt to the visionary ghoulishness of George Romero, who made ''Night of the Living Dead,'' ''Dawn of the Dead'' and ''Day of the Dead.'' The suggestive juxtaposition of zombification and consumerism in ''Dawn,'' which took place mostly in an abandoned shopping mall, is evoked in several scenes here, as are the queasy racial politics of ''Night.''

But the most haunting moments in ''28 Days Later,'' which opens today nationwide, have little to do with social allegory, graphic horror or cinematic shock tactics. The movie, shot in digital video by Anthony Dod Mantle (who has worked with Dogma 95 disciples like Harmony Korine, Thomas Vinterberg and Lars von Trier), sometimes has an ethereal, almost painterly beauty. The London skyline takes on the faded, melancholy quality of a Turner watercolor; a field of flowers looks as if it were daubed and scraped directly onto the screen. Thanks to Mr. Mantle's images and Mr. Boyle's unexpected restraint, the middle section of the picture, though punctuated by mayhem and grimness, has a pastoral mood, and the actors, unwinding from the stress and panic of London, are allowed to be warm, loose and funny.

Mr. Boyle, whose other films include ''Shallow Grave'' and ''Trainspotting,'' has never been accused of lacking narrative flair or visual style. Rather, he has sometimes been suspected of having too much of both, and of lacking gravity or soul. Those movies, though exciting, could leave a sour aftertaste of cynicism in your mouth. The content of this one is far more extreme; you can almost smell the rotting flesh. But what lingers is a curious sweetness. Mr. Boyle has hardly lost his sly, provocative perversity or his ear for the rhythms of unchecked violence, but he does seem to be maturing. It's as if, in contemplating the annihilation of the human race, he has discovered his inner humanist.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Apr 16, 2017
A blow of fresh air for Z- genre; has all the witt that lacks Resident Evil. Precisely mixes the suspense and the horror with a almost silent score and envolving atmosphere.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
BroyaxMay 3, 2021
Un film de zombis qui ne réinvente pas la roue mais qui bénéficie d’un fort bon niveau de réalisme avec de plus quelques pointes de cynisme ici et là, comme souvent dans les films de Danny Boyle d’ailleurs. L’ambiance est clairement frappanteUn film de zombis qui ne réinvente pas la roue mais qui bénéficie d’un fort bon niveau de réalisme avec de plus quelques pointes de cynisme ici et là, comme souvent dans les films de Danny Boyle d’ailleurs. L’ambiance est clairement frappante pour ne pas dire oppressante malgré un léger manque de moyens, ma foi…

De facture somme toute classique, le scénario tient dans l’ensemble la route en dépit de quelques facilités vers la fin ; d’un rythme soutenu, on ne s’y ennuie pas du tout sauf vers le début lors d’une jérémiade involontaire sans doute.

Cependant, la réalisation s’avère de temps à autre un peu trop désordonnée, notamment lors de combats plus ou moins brutaux et enragés ; ça bouge et ça secoue, ça « coupe » un peu trop, c’est confus et… désordonné. En outre, les comédiens principaux ne sont pas très convaincants, notamment Murphy et la fille noire qui font pencher le film vers le téléfilm.

Enfin, le côté téléfilm ou « documentaire » intentionnel, trop intentionnel à mon avis a nui gravement à la qualité de l’image, volontairement un peu trop détériorée… mettre le blu-ray et se demander si on ne s’est pas trompé, si on a pas mis un dvd, voire un vieux divx pourri, c’est quand même embêtant !

En bref, un film plutôt agréable tiré vers le bas par quelques choix tantôt mauvais, tantôt surprenants, voire carrément les deux, Mon Général !… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
eriflynnNov 20, 2017
Maybe from George A. Romero i had not seen a movie of zombies what surprised me too much.
Night of the living dead was a icon of the 60's and i really bealive what this movie will become an icon for the next years.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
dashtagMay 4, 2017
This is a classic and frightening Zombie Film that introduced a smart type of horror to the genre. 28 Days Later is very entertaining, very well written, and well acted with a great cast. The visuals and the camera work is beautiful, and theThis is a classic and frightening Zombie Film that introduced a smart type of horror to the genre. 28 Days Later is very entertaining, very well written, and well acted with a great cast. The visuals and the camera work is beautiful, and the directing is on point. I could watch this movie over and over again, and there aren't parts of the movie that are too bloody or gory, which is perfect! I highly recommend 28 Days Later!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
mrdr4gonDec 15, 2017
Mildly interesting horror movie that starts with a great premise, then sort of aimlessly meanders around with it. It's a decent enough watch but there's not much to it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
amheretojudgeJan 3, 2019
This Day. This Moment. Now.

28 Days Later Boyle's thrilling ride is a family drama that seeks stillness and devours it all the way. The infected virus and a lone family surviving the extinction, a concept that has been visited a many times,This Day. This Moment. Now.

28 Days Later

Boyle's thrilling ride is a family drama that seeks stillness and devours it all the way. The infected virus and a lone family surviving the extinction, a concept that has been visited a many times, and a concept that more than often delivers. Fortunately, being on the larger margin, the film's eerie camera work and the uncertainty of the antagonist that even scares the viewers as much as a walk in the dark does. Visiting new locations and meeting new characters, the film never feels like shattered into various chapters, the transactions of one antic as such to another is left on Boyle's brilliant execution that fabricates Garland's explicit script into a documentary like footage.

Among these various so called chapters, one of the best is the sort of semi-government camp of troops that helps our lead characters survive. This is where Garland's vision widens and generalizes to a taunt that cuts deepest into our bones, as a society. His message is so vivid and jaggedly on mark, where he peels the human nature to its worst honest figure that the harrowing images is the least concern of ours on terms of horror.

To weave out a satire as such at a point of crises shows the brilliance of the makers and the zest of sculpting art as delicate and as honest as possible. Murphy as our host to this infected world remains the last one to be on lead and feels less of a protagonist than any other, this ingenious method of Garland keeps the tale grounded in this fiction. Harris as a strongsmart jaw clenching woman and Gleeson as an overprotective supporter helps stabilize the tone aptly. 28 Days Later predicts less of the future world and mirrors more of our current issues of loss and gain.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
LoletinAlexisNov 1, 2020
28 Days Later, they rightly say that this one is a cult film...

Fantastic performances for a desolating message (which is even more so in the sequel, by the way).
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilipeNetoApr 15, 2020
More interesting than I thought.

When I decided to watch this film, I thought it would be just another zombie B movie. However, I think I was wrong. The plot is much better and more interesting. It all starts when a group of animalMore interesting than I thought.

When I decided to watch this film, I thought it would be just another zombie B movie. However, I think I was wrong. The plot is much better and more interesting.

It all starts when a group of animal activists break into a laboratory to free chimpanzees that are used as guinea pigs. It turns out that at least some were infected with a new virus, which spreads through body fluids and was being studied. Sometime after that, Jim wakes up from a 28-day coma caused by a car accident. To his surprise, he did not see a single person and only when reading some abandoned newspapers did he realize that, while he was hospitalized, the entire population was either evacuated or died. There follows a search for someone still alive, and the struggle to survive.

This film is set against the backdrop of a Zombie pandemic, but the focus is not on those infected or the panic surrounding the disease and its fight. When the movie starts it has already happened, the city is deserted and it looks like the entire human race has been killed. It is quite intense to see this on the screen and a very positive point. I made an effort not to get caught up in details, if we start to think hard the plot reveals flaws in logic. Things get worse in the final half, with the soldiers behaving like mercenaries, in addition to maintaining an "fort" in an unusual way, without any kind of replenishment of ammunition or food ... it's like I say: if we think of ourselves plot details, it falls apart.

The best part of the film is to focus on the characters and allow us to create an emotional bond with them as we get to know them better. This is not very common in these films. Cillian Murphy did a good job, very psychological. We can see the internal conflicts that his character lives, particularly when he is faced with death (that of people who are dear to him, that of people who have to kill to stay alive). He was the most anonymous of the actors in the film, but the effort paid off: it opened doors for more ambitious works like "Girl with a Pearl Earring" and "Cold Mountain". Naomi Harris is excellent too, has the presence and inner strength that her character needed. Like Noah Huntley, whom she shades almost completely, she already had a steady TV career. Brendan Gleeson is also a veteran and plays an excellent role here. The worst was the soldiers. It is from there that the film begins to gradually lose itself until reaching a rather weak ending, in the style of Rambo, or something like that. Even so, it is a film that is superior to a lot of American trash that circulates around.

Technically, it is a very interesting film. The direction, ensured by Danny Boyle, bets strongly on discrete special effects that accentuate the dramatic tension and suspense without overlapping the work of the actors or the story. I think Boyle realized that this is, in fact, the role of special and sound effects, very much in contrast to what we see in American films, where the use and abuse of effects and CGI sometimes make you forget what goes on in the film.

Overall, it is a good film, albeit with flaws.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DeepKamateApr 1, 2018
I think this film specificly taken me to the genre of zombie movies. I like almost everything about it, except for an overly optimistic ending and the whole episode with the solders. By the end, it's becoms less and less really intense andI think this film specificly taken me to the genre of zombie movies. I like almost everything about it, except for an overly optimistic ending and the whole episode with the solders. By the end, it's becoms less and less really intense and frightening episodes, and because of what the atmosphere begins to seriously suffer. However, given how many new and wonderful things this film brought to the horror genre, it's delightful soundtrack and camera work, we must forgive almost everything. Unfortunately, this film is so good that maybe it will scare you away from the whole horror genre, considering that you can not find anything better...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LegitSaltMay 26, 2018
This is a movie that I have been meaning to get around to for a while now. After having finally seen it, I can say that I was not disappointed. From the time that Cillian wakes up, until the time that he reaches the gas station, I wasThis is a movie that I have been meaning to get around to for a while now. After having finally seen it, I can say that I was not disappointed. From the time that Cillian wakes up, until the time that he reaches the gas station, I was completely engaged. The long wide shots and tracking shots that showed how lonely and empty the world was really helped build up tension and atmosphere. The movie ended on a nice cliff-hanger, keeping you guessing and wondering, but with a hopeful tone. I also thought it was potentially confusing that the scene wherein Cillian actually wakes up was shot the exact same way as his dream sequence. Because of this, I wasn't sure whether it was all a dream, or if that was an unintentional side effect of using digital film. I really enjoyed the movie's thematic elements, posing the rhetorical question of "What makes a human?". Christopher Eccleston's character did a good job portraying a character that justified his, otherwise unacceptable actions, with the epidemic that took so many lives. There were several other characters and remarks that added to this theme. One such occurrence is when the soldiers were making a game out of taking 'human' lives. The first part of the opening worked really well as a "narration" of sorts, truly hitting home the "show don't tell" concept. Unfortunately, the entire opening was not this way, for when the scientist guy showed up and tried to explain the monkeys, he explains that "They are infected with rage", which I felt was a stupid explanation, this took me out of the experience. The youngest girl has some absolutely terrible line delivery and acting, but the bad line delivery was not limited to her. Overall the child actor was pretty garbage, but there were a few scenes in which she performed above average. Overall, I would recommend this to fans of zombie films and/or 'The Walking Dead', due to its bleak and somewhat slow pace, depicting an apocalyptic world.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FalaaxApr 6, 2018
Good movie that I recommend. The atmosphere is brilliantly built and it leaves us thinking about what our society would look like if an apocalyptic scenario like this one happened one day.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RaduAApr 14, 2019
70/100

It was OK... I know it was new for 2002, but now it's not for me... but it's all as much as entertaining. The acting is ok but the little girl does not play well... I didn't liked how it was filmed. The story is interesting and does70/100

It was OK...
I know it was new for 2002, but now it's not for me... but it's all as much as entertaining. The acting is ok but the little girl does not play well... I didn't liked how it was filmed. The story is interesting and does not really focus on the ,,zombies" but on the characters, what I liked. Some scenes when an infected is coming are very repetitive and there is no suspense ...
I recommend it? Yes, for fans of this genre.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieReviewer45May 26, 2018
This is one of those outbreak or "zombie" movies that are terrifying and full of intense atmosphere that will provide a decent and rather enjoyable treat for moviegoers. The movie has a decent storytelling, splendid film score, soundtrack andThis is one of those outbreak or "zombie" movies that are terrifying and full of intense atmosphere that will provide a decent and rather enjoyable treat for moviegoers. The movie has a decent storytelling, splendid film score, soundtrack and lovely characters. The film does not focus all of its strength in providing horror and dread but also manages to provide heart, drama, and transcends it's quality expectations for some moviegoers.

It has also nicely themes and messages about social and political issues that deserves some credit from it's viewers.

Also, the movie reinvents the zombie genre to an all new level because of it's fast-paced and widely energetic antagonists which in turn makes the film fast-paced as well.

Rating: 7/10 -> 3.5/5 stars… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JuanmaKVRMar 31, 2019
Siendo una pelicula de la cual no me esperaba nada, verla en 2019 es una delicia.
Nos situa en un momento muy particular, los animalistas, queriendo liberar monos de un laboratorio de investigación, sin saberlo, liberan la mayor plaga en todoSiendo una pelicula de la cual no me esperaba nada, verla en 2019 es una delicia.
Nos situa en un momento muy particular, los animalistas, queriendo liberar monos de un laboratorio de investigación, sin saberlo, liberan la mayor plaga en todo reino unido, una variación de la Rabia que se contagia por sangre y saliva.
Esta situación nos presenta una historia post-apocalíptica de supervicencia, algunos momentos de tensión, propaganda de Pepsi y personajes con personalidades muy diferentes.
Para no entrar en Spoilers, voy a dejar la trama.
Para ser una pelicula del 2003, los efectos son muy disfrutables a día de hoy y la ambientación es simplemente espectacular.
"La salvación existe, no es bonita, pero existe".… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jonslowDec 11, 2018
This is the very early zombie film I watched and it's one of the best in my list.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
harvdog03Oct 30, 2018
I don't get all the hype with this movie. Yeah it was okay but not all that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThejodjeremieNov 18, 2020
The movie is great zombie survival flick with action, suspense, and horror. The actors all do a great job. I do think some camera shots looked weird but it was still great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Toasty87Jul 10, 2020
Brilliant just that starting few scenes really gets the blood pumping and eyes moving.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Iddis17Sep 11, 2020
A really good movie that never stops thrilling you and keeps you on edge. The action is robust and the character development is really good , with great acting , screen play and atmosphere while it isn't too scary it manages to keep youA really good movie that never stops thrilling you and keeps you on edge. The action is robust and the character development is really good , with great acting , screen play and atmosphere while it isn't too scary it manages to keep you slightly alert. A really fun watch .… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JLauSep 23, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Animal rights activists accidentally release chimps carrying a zombie-like virus and a guy wakes up from a coma to find London full of these zombies and some rats, so heads up to Manchester.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
geewahJan 12, 2021
One of the best zombie movies ever made.
The opening scenes are unforgettable and it's followed by a well told, edge of the seat thriller.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
janwe04Jul 22, 2022
I really didn’t expect this. Wow… this movie was so good! The music ist awesome.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

73 Critic Reviews

7.7 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 84 Are You There God? It's Me,...
2 78 John Wick: Chapter 4
3 75 Polite Society
4 73 Air
5 72 Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among...
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL