The Rock

Name: The Rock
Genre: Action, Adventure, Thriller
Released: June 7, 1996
Duration: 136 min
Rating: 58
Cast: Ed Harris, Nicolas Cage, Sean Connery

1996

METASCORE

Mixed or average reviews based on 24 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Universal acclaim based on 426 Ratings

See All

8.6

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8.6	Your Score
8.6	User Score Universal acclaim based on 426 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Play Sound

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

The Rock

Now Playing: The Rock

Movie Details & Credits

Buena Vista Pictures | Release Date: June 7, 1996 | R

Starring: Ed Harris, Nicolas Cage, Sean Connery

Summary: All of San Francisco is taken hostage when a vengeful general (Ed Harris) seizes control of Alcatraz Island, threatening to launch missiles loaded with deadly poison gas. With time running out, only a young FBI chemical weapons expert (Nicolas Cage) and a notorious federal prisoner (Sean Connery) have the skills to penetrate the islandAll of San Francisco is taken hostage when a vengeful general (Ed Harris) seizes control of Alcatraz Island, threatening to launch missiles loaded with deadly poison gas. With time running out, only a young FBI chemical weapons expert (Nicolas Cage) and a notorious federal prisoner (Sean Connery) have the skills to penetrate the island fortress and defuse the lethal situation. [Buena Vista Entertainment]… Expand

Director: Michael Bay

Genre(s): Action, Adventure, Thriller

Rating: R

Runtime: 136 min

See All Details and Credits

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Roger Ebert

A first-rate, slam-bang action thriller with a lot of style and no little humor. Read full review

Barbara Shulgasser

Bay has two great assets in Connery and Cage. The special effects give The Rock a James Bondian feel so Connery's wry, world-weary devil-may-careishness looks right at home here. Read full review

Desmond Ryan

The borrowings from other movies, going all the way back to the car chase in 1968's Bullitt, are heavy. But Bay has three leads to lend weight and dimension to characters who are hardly original and flatly written. Read full review

Chris Kridler

Connery and Cage are a compelling team and redeem the film from ruin despite the mechanical plot, an excessive body count and a miraculous recovery (you'll know it when you see it). Read full review

Kenneth Turan

Slick and forceful, largely unconcerned with character, eager for any opportunity to pump up the volume both literally and metaphorically, The Rock is the kind of efficient entertainment that is hard to take pleasure in. Read full review

Mike Clark

Buried under an avalanche of action. (1996 June 7, pg. D1)

David Sterritt

Can a mild-mannered toxicologist and an eccentric Alcatraz veteran stop him before it's too late? Learning the answer means sitting through more than two hours of violence, vulgarity, and all-around excess, served up with high-tech trimmings by director Michael Bay. Read full review

SEE ALL 24 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

garza

Jan 19, 2011

I have to disagree WilliamO. You have to understand that this movie was made in the 90's, back then the movies weren't as good as they are now. Also the movie shows what goes on in the marines mind, what they think should happen. Over all "The Rock" is and will always be my number one movie.I have to disagree WilliamO. You have to understand that this movie was made in the 90's, back then the movies weren't as good as they are now. Also the movie shows what goes on in the marines mind, what they think should happen. Over all "The Rock" is and will always be my number one movie. This movie is Michael Bay's best movie besides transformers.… Expand

32 of 35 users found this helpful323

Tagol

Jun 29, 2007

Critics are stupid.At least de negative scores.This film is a GREAT action movie.I got a real pleasure watching it.Very good actors,good music,good story,good everything.

3 of 4 users found this helpful

paull

Aug 16, 2008

Geese ciritc do take sthings serouisly about the movie being bad but THIS is a good action movie with the breakthrough of nicolas cage and sean connery. They had great chemistry.

5 of 6 users found this helpful

EpicLadySponge

May 11, 2016

Seems to be the only lovable Michael Bay film as this far. If he can actually work out and make movies that doesn't have to be the same old clichés every single time (I'm looking at your explosions, Michael Bay!), maybe this might be the first lovable film.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

[Anonymous]

Oct 7, 2005

Believe it or not, Michael Bay did make a strong, GOOD action movie, and here it is.

2 of 2 users found this helpful

GerardistheWay

Jan 12, 2017

How could Michael Bay have fallen so far in just 20 years? Though it is largely a picture that doesn’t require much use of one’s brain, “The Rock” succeeds in its goal to entertain with frenetic action, likable leads, and one of the better screenplays Bay’s brought to the big screen (thoughHow could Michael Bay have fallen so far in just 20 years? Though it is largely a picture that doesn’t require much use of one’s brain, “The Rock” succeeds in its goal to entertain with frenetic action, likable leads, and one of the better screenplays Bay’s brought to the big screen (though that should probably tell you something). Hell, watching this he even seems like a promising, talented director, and he probably once was before delving into a world of big paydays in exchange for sh**ty acting and CGI overload.

The film opens in stereotypical revenge film fashion: with the main antagonist visiting the grave of a dead loved one. That would be General Frank Hummel (Ed Harris), a bona-fide American hero who’s seen at least three decades of war. Yet Hummel is upset by the US government’s failure to pay the families of Marines under his command slain on covert missions. His respect for his fellow servicemen follows over into a raid conducted by him and some of his men on a top-secret government storage facility, telling them “no casualties” (something he seems to forget later on in the film). When all is said and done, they’ve made off with 15 rockets armed with V-X gas (though not the normal kind, a scarier-looking version that melts one’s skin for some reason) and proceed to Alcatraz, where they hold a group of tourists hostage and threaten to kill the population of San Francisco unless $100 million is transferred from a military slush fund. Sent to stop him are John Mason (Sean Connery), a former SAS captain held prisoner by the US government for over 30 years without due process for stealing a microfilm filled with state secrets, and Stanley Goodspeed (Nicolas Cage), an FBI chemist who curiously works well under pressure but is terrified by the idea of having to do so. Once their Navy SEAL escort is killed by Hummel’s forces, Mason and Goodspeed must brave the treacherous island while avoiding the General’s men and disarming the rockets. From there, it takes only a knowledge of “Die Hard”-esque action movies to guess what’s going to happen from there.

Something that works against the film in my opinion is Hummel’s characterization, which is constantly in conflict with itself. He is depicted in the movie as having a strong sense of honor, which undercuts some of the more ruthless actions he attempts by making it seem like he will be unable to follow through on them. In what world is the man who threatens millions of lives with nerve gas-enhanced ballistic missiles the same man who tells a group of kids to leave the island he plans on taking over so that they’re not in danger? What ruthless terrorist threatens to gun down enemy soldiers if they don’t drop their weapons but then gives them plenty of time to surrender and tries to stop his own men from firing on them? Hummel seems like too good and honorable of a man to pull off the attack, and though Harris plays him well a little more ambiguity might have served the character well. Don’t get me wrong, though, this movie does possess its strengths. Connery brings dry wit to the character of John Mason that makes him resemble an elderly James Bond, Cage is good and even likable as the reluctant hero, Harris generates sympathy and concern for General Hummel, and the supporting cast ranging in star power from 80s action icons like Michael Biehn (Corporal Hicks in “Aliens”) in the role of a SEAL commander to others like William Forsythe (who I first discovered by watching the Rob Zombie flick “The Devil’s Rejects”) playing a more typical FBI Agent (interestingly enough, a lot of Forsythe’s previous roles had been as “tough guy” gangsters) occupy their allotted space well. Nothing about the story is particularly new, but it’s executed with enough vigor and energy to give the genre clichés contained within it fresh life. The film also provides a welcome change of pace in villains by switching gears from Russian or Iranian or wealthy megalomaniac terrorists to American terrorists. Quite the change, I know. But in an era when we are becoming more and more wary of the world around us and the people who inhabit it, a reminder that we can just as easily face enemies at home is both refreshing and a little frightening.

Michael Bay’s first film is probably his best, which should probably tell you something about the state of his career. If he could somehow return to this phase, the director who once showed promise and didn’t kill brain cells and acting careers with his movies, and start over, he could have possibly done some great things in cinema. But alas, what’s done is done and we’re left with only a hair lip reminder of what could have been. 7/10… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

WilliamO.

Jan 18, 2009

On of the worst movies ever. Unrealistic in almost all aspects , it screams Hollywood cliche at every corner. The Bad Guys are sophisticated and an deadly at the start, while the recue team is shown to be reminiscant of the Keystone cops, with the exception of the 2 men least suited for the On of the worst movies ever. Unrealistic in almost all aspects , it screams Hollywood cliche at every corner. The Bad Guys are sophisticated and an deadly at the start, while the recue team is shown to be reminiscant of the Keystone cops, with the exception of the 2 men least suited for the Job. But when thesesame to go against the rest of the Island weare suddenly led to believe that the Bad guys are bumbling fools. Only an idiot would find this movie entertaining, Definetly one of Micheal Bay's worst.… Expand

0 of 8 users found this helpful

SEE ALL 47 REVIEWS

75	#75 Best Movie of 1996
10	#10 Most Discussed Movie of 1996
23	#23 Most Shared Movie of 1996