Email Address

Password

Forgot password?

The Young Victoria

Name: The Young Victoria
Genre: Biography, Drama, History, Romance
Released: December 18, 2009
Duration: 105 min
Rating: 64
Cast: Emily Blunt, Paul Bettany, Rupert Friend

2009

METASCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 29 Critic Reviews

See All

USER SCORE

Generally favorable reviews based on 70 Ratings

See All

8.0

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

8.0	Your Score
8.0	User Score Generally favorable reviews based on 70 Ratings

Would you like to write a review?

There is a 75 character minimum for reviews. If your review contains spoilers, please check the Spoiler box. Please do not use ALL CAPS. There is no linking or other HTML allowed. Your review may be edited for content. 0/5000

Check box if your review contains spoilers

Please enter your birth date to watch this video:

You are not allowed to view this material at this time.

The Young Victoria

Movie Details & Credits

Apparition | Release Date: December 18, 2009 | PG

Starring: Emily Blunt, Paul Bettany, Rupert Friend

Summary: The story of Queen Victoria's early rise to power spans from her predicament as an object of a royal power-struggle in to her romantic courtship and legendary marriage to Prince Albert. (Momentum Pictures)

Director: Jean-Marc Vallée

Genre(s): Biography, Drama, History, Romance

Rating: PG

Runtime: 105 min

See All Details and Credits

Awards & Rankings

Watch Now

Buy On

Stream On

Metascore

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Critic Reviews

Owen Gleiberman

The Young Victoria has a subtler flow than you might expect, and at times it's calmer than you may like. Director Jean-Marc Vallée's images have a creamy stateliness, but this is no gilded? princess fantasy. Read full review

Betsy Sharkey

This is a smartly told story, and as fresh as any contemporary romance. Read full review

Roger Ebert

Emily Blunt makes Victoria as irresistible a young woman as Dame Judi Dench made her an older one in "Mrs. Brown" (1997). Read full review

Manohla Dargis

Despite the filmmakers’ efforts to persuade us that The Young Victoria is a serious work, and despite some tense moments and gunfire, the movie’s pleasures are as light as its story. No matter. Albert may never rip Victoria’s bodice, but he does eventually loosen it, to her delight and ours. Read full review

James Berardinelli

The Young Victoria feels like a wasted opportunity and is among the least impressive in a long line of motion pictures about British royalty. Read full review

Joe Holleman

If not for Blunt's solid performance and good support from Friend and others, The Young Victoria would not be worth the price of the ticket. Read full review

Phil Hall

Emily Blunt’s Victoria and Rupert Friend’s Albert come across like museum mannequins – utterly devoid of any genuine passion. Read full review

SEE ALL 29 REVIEWS

Write a Review

User Reviews

epictvsaga

Dec 13, 2010

Yet another movie that has amazing talent! 10 out of 10! Acting, score, and story were all linked to greatness. If you're looking for a movie with decency and morality, then this is a movie for you to watch!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

RussD

Jan 7, 2010

A wonderful movie! Emily Blunt is superb.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

RickA

Jan 16, 2010

I sure liked this one. Great acting and excellent story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

TDKinDallas

Jan 4, 2010

We really enjoyed it. Luckily, it must have been made for me to enjoy and not the critics. I wish it had been even longer and more in depth.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Tokyochuchu

Feb 18, 2013

Young Victoria is an unbelievably sumptuous period drama with great turns from it's strong cast. Better still, the movie is genuinely moving and romantic without feeling forced. An excellent film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

mischkasmum

Jun 16, 2012

I enjoyed this movie but it wasn't exactly "historically accurate". Not ONCE did I hear Queen Victoria's true title, which was "monarch of the United Kingdom of GREAT BRITAIN and Ireland. She was always referred to as the Queen of England. In fact all references were to England, which wouldI enjoyed this movie but it wasn't exactly "historically accurate". Not ONCE did I hear Queen Victoria's true title, which was "monarch of the United Kingdom of GREAT BRITAIN and Ireland. She was always referred to as the Queen of England. In fact all references were to England, which would have been forgivable had the writer had been a foreigner but I was shocked to see that it was Sir Julian Fellowes - who really ought to know better!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

smijatov

Sep 6, 2010

Emily Blunt is very much excellent in this film, and definitely deserving of her Golden Globe nomination. Also, technically (especially when it comes to costume design and art direction/set decoration) the film excels. However, the story is rather slow and somewhat boring to be quite frank.Emily Blunt is very much excellent in this film, and definitely deserving of her Golden Globe nomination. Also, technically (especially when it comes to costume design and art direction/set decoration) the film excels. However, the story is rather slow and somewhat boring to be quite frank.
Also, very predictable and very "royal" in a way of character building. Yes, royalty is supposed to be all "royal" to the "common people" but they are real people, too, and that came across rather rarely, mainly due to the sceenplay. So basically, despite being visually great and with good performances, ultimately the story is so usual and so predictable (irrelevant on whether it is actually accurate historically or not - probably not completely, anyway) that one is left somewhat unsatisfied with the film. But it surely is not a bad film, by any stretch of the word. Definitely recommended to be watched for the great costumes and Emily Blunt's performance!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

SEE ALL 17 REVIEWS