SummaryThe greatest warriors of all time face off against one another. History provides the information; scientific tests and expert testimonials provide the results. Hours of intensive research is done to answer one question; "Who is Deadliest?"
SummaryThe greatest warriors of all time face off against one another. History provides the information; scientific tests and expert testimonials provide the results. Hours of intensive research is done to answer one question; "Who is Deadliest?"
A genuine treat for history savvy and/or combat fans of all likings. "Deadliest Warrior" is a "blast, pow, clang, clash, boom, pop" from the past, bringing plenty of blood and "kick-butt" knowledge for the next addition in the history meets science genre of modern television.
Anyone who enjoys military history has probably thought about how many of the matchups in the show would turn out on an actual battlefield. However, this show is basically just using the opinions of the hosts and a computer program to simulate fights. Battles are not fought in a pitri dish, and this show pretty much proves that.
As if someone gave this crap a ten and then went on to complain. This show is awful. It's full of pseudoscience and inconsistencies. They base who wins on 4 simulations of 1v1 weapon skirmishes. Sorry, but the weapon match ups are just awful. A shield versus a club? Black egg versus a weapon? Pirate against knight? Pathetic.