User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 82 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 60 out of 82
-
Mixed: 10 out of 82
-
Negative: 12 out of 82
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
SteveCOct 26, 2006Pretentious rubbish. Awful. Talentless. Highly irritating.
-
-
JasonAug 10, 2006I clearly missed something too because a friend just called me last night to rave about these guys. Unfortunately, I'd already heard this album and couldn't get through it a 2nd time.
-
-
ChrisMJul 11, 2006Utter crap... Arogs' voice is annoying, and to hear him trample and stumble his way over some very pedestrian arrangements makes me wonder how deprived most listeners/critics are if they're giving this glowing reviews. Bland, bland music.
-
-
MattD.Jul 11, 2006Tries to be funny, but the lyrics are dumb, and the vocals and music sound like a parody. I'll give it 2 points for effort. Try Ted Leo instead if you want fresh pop/punk.
-
-
MarkJun 21, 2006Clearly, I missed something. This album is crap.
-
-
freerangechildDec 21, 2005Falkous would stomp these guys. Also, before anyone listens to this crud.... FIND OUT WHO MARK E SMITH IS There is really no excuse for not knowing by now. There is also no excuse for liking this album. Ryan Schreiber needs to be kicked in the balls.
-
-
bobbobertDec 12, 2005
-
-
thekingJul 14, 2005worst band ever.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jun 6, 2005
-
-
lozdJun 3, 2005
-
Awards & Rankings
-
SpinThese Brits deconstruct bombast via bombastic guitar riffs. [Jun 2005, p.108]
-
It all adds up to blatantly catchy, deceptively simple wannabe-clever, can’t-help-but-be-cheeky art-punk.
-
MojoEvery generation needs an Art Brut. [Jun 2005, p.100]