Generally favorable reviews - based on 24 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 24
  2. Negative: 0 out of 24
Buy On
  1. Mojo
    Jan 18, 2013
    Atmospheric, reverbed beats that suggest indie boys who dance. [Feb 2013, p.98]
  2. Ultimately, Grace/Confusion is a production best staged in the theatre of your mind.
  3. Dec 17, 2012
    An experiment in style that is perhaps a little confusing at first; but more than makes up for it in its grace.
  4. Uncut
    Dec 11, 2012
    Mostly, he comes across as a one-man Arcade Fire. [Jan 2013, p.79]
  5. Dec 10, 2012
    The album clocks in under 40 minutes, and its experimental touches are modest.
  6. Dec 6, 2012
    Grace/Confusion goes above and beyond the call of pop, and signals grander adventures to come.
  7. Dec 6, 2012
    The reinvigorated results feel warm-blooded, definite, vulnerable, exposed.
  8. Dec 6, 2012
    While Grace/Confusion may lean too heavily on Hawk's production, it's a hair better than Player Piano. But it's hard to call it an "improvement" or "progression" considering it's hardly outside the scope of what Memory Tapes has done so far.
  9. Dec 5, 2012
    Grace/Confusion sees Hawk get back on track, by remembering what worked in the first place.
  10. 75
    The disc's six tracks clock in at less than 40 minutes, so there isn't really time to screw things up on a royal scale, making Grace/Confusion a fine listen.
  11. Dec 4, 2012
    The album, titled Grace/Confusion, offers the chillwave sound that Hawk is known for but with a fuller, crisper and more melodic take.
  12. Dec 4, 2012
    They take the things about Italo disco and synth pop that I love and imbibe them with genuine humanity and masterful songwriting.
  13. Dec 4, 2012
    By throwing out the genre rulebook, Hawk is pushing electronic music into weirder, more exciting territory, chillwave purists be damned.
  14. Dec 3, 2012
    sity. Dayve Hawke has created a record that's as graceful (sorry) as it is mighty.
  15. Dec 3, 2012
    Grace/Confusion is an aptly confounding record, its six tracks very much dissimilar to each other yet held together with a sense of grand gesturing and tireless virtuosity.
  16. Dec 3, 2012
    While a good background album it may be, it's not exactly gripping. The songs are too multifaceted to feel cohesive, yet they never seem strikingly experimental.

There are no user reviews yet.