How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb
by U2
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 409 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 294 out of 409
  2. Mixed: 34 out of 409
  3. Negative: 81 out of 409

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. GeorgeS
    Feb 11, 2005
    0
    This album is an absolute piece of crap and anyone with any musical sense would throw it out the window for being tainted by this bland, vanilla, and sickening commercial use of the name "U2". Fortunately, I didn't waste any money on this piece of trash. My aunt gave it to me because she couldn't bare the embarrassment of owning it herself. Those who thought Pop a low musical This album is an absolute piece of crap and anyone with any musical sense would throw it out the window for being tainted by this bland, vanilla, and sickening commercial use of the name "U2". Fortunately, I didn't waste any money on this piece of trash. My aunt gave it to me because she couldn't bare the embarrassment of owning it herself. Those who thought Pop a low musical effort will take it back when they hear this sad attempt to make up for the fact that the real U2 is no longer with us. Bono has become a total sellout egomaniac. Furthermore, this album is atrociously boring and overhyped as their pitiful 2000 era. Overall this crap is just forgettable drivel taking snippets of other ideas from their previous album and trying to market what people expect to be the "U2" sound. Score more points for the recording industry and for the greed of artists thriving on past glories and too indifferent to produce new ones. Stay away from this lame album and buy some of U2's 90s work instead.… Expand
  2. RicardoP
    Feb 11, 2005
    0
    "Vertigo" is a clear indicator of how awful this album is. Bono - with the reluctant agreement of Adam and Larry - decided it would be clever to release an absurdly radio-friendly single that had no melody, no rhythm, and an inane lyric repeated over and over. Video promo is even more stupid. Neverthless that garbage was N°1 both in the USA and the UK... There are too many stupid "Vertigo" is a clear indicator of how awful this album is. Bono - with the reluctant agreement of Adam and Larry - decided it would be clever to release an absurdly radio-friendly single that had no melody, no rhythm, and an inane lyric repeated over and over. Video promo is even more stupid. Neverthless that garbage was N°1 both in the USA and the UK... There are too many stupid songs to be even considered U2. For example "Sometimes", "Love and Peace", "Species", "All Because Of You", "A Man", "One Step Closer", etc. This is an unimaginative album with the overdependence on Bono. He makes whatever he wants in this crap, he screams all over the place with his thin voice, he sings the same s**t once again, he does it everything. Dreadful Lyrics, horrible lead vocals. At least it's clear The Edge plays guitars...but the rest ? who the hell are Adam and Larry now ? I mean, every kid who has been playing guitar for 2 years can play better basslines than Adam. The same thing happen with Larry's drumming. Where were you identityless hypocritical phony U2 fans supporting the band when this trash came out ? U2 lost their original fan base by releasing this overhyped mainstream bulls**t. I'd prefer that they never released this complete disaster. This unlistenable monstrosity is tired, dull pop, the kind it gets worn out after a few weeks of radio exposition. A pity. "Species" is a collection of bad songwriting decisions. This doesn't even deserve the name of U2 on it. Goodbye Bono, go sing your iPod/Super Bowl/Grammy you sellout !… Expand
  3. LarsJ
    Feb 10, 2005
    7
    Gotta agree with Andrew on this one. It´s an ok, easy-listening sort of album, but in no way compares to either Joshua tree or Achtung baby. I don´t get why the band themselves kept calling this their best work -even for fans, this is average U2. (Which is still pretty good, but not their best work by a longshot)
  4. afghan
    Feb 16, 2005
    4
    weakest u2 album
  5. DennisD
    Feb 16, 2005
    5
    overhyped and underwhelming... U2 has produced some all-time classic CDs, but this is not one of them.
  6. terryb
    Feb 17, 2005
    7
    Ok, its not the best of u2, its not the worst,(remember zooropa) but to give the album a 0 is just not geniune. You still got to remember that even a bad u2 is still better than 99% of the bands out there.
  7. ChrisR
    Feb 19, 2005
    1
    They've lost it. No imagination, no new ideas, just recycling older material. Same lyrical treatment, same production skills. Some of their '90s albums even sound more modern. This proves two things: 1) They've run out of creativity, 2) They're just in it for the money now. Sad.
  8. ErikD
    Feb 22, 2005
    9
    It grew on my significantly...first 3 tracks are simply outstanding!
  9. RyanC
    Feb 22, 2005
    1
    Its about time we remembered that U2 are not actually any good. Really, it was over long ago. End it before they do an REM and make us foreget why people liked them in the first place. Remember them for pre-91 material I guess
  10. Lisa
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    After Pop ( rediscovered recenty by thousands of dissapointed fans ) the band became increasingly conventional. This album just displays something to feed those hysterical, swooning teens who love anything named as "U2". It's an unwritten rule that any new product seem to be "the best", even for "critics" like Rolling Stone. But U2 forgot 99% of their fans aren't those children After Pop ( rediscovered recenty by thousands of dissapointed fans ) the band became increasingly conventional. This album just displays something to feed those hysterical, swooning teens who love anything named as "U2". It's an unwritten rule that any new product seem to be "the best", even for "critics" like Rolling Stone. But U2 forgot 99% of their fans aren't those children who listen to Jessica Simpson or Beyonce, so we can't swallow the hype alone. We were promised a "REAL PUNK ROCK ALBUM" ( Bono, 2004 ) and that's what seems to be if you take a look at the sleeve. With the cover front alone U2 make fool of fans. That's something censureable. Far from the former "three chords and the truth" band we discovered by 80's. What we found was just something we've heard since 2000. AN UNDENIABLE FRAUD. Everything was calculated, neverthless they made a big mistake: to take us for granted. Everything they did was wrong. And now they have to carry on with that. Fans don't want to be treated as stupid children anymore. We don't care if they're going to tour, it will be a vocal disaster, and surely it will be a mix between 90's and Elevation Tour. U2 have become a predictable commercial company. Pathetic… Expand
  11. KevinIsmyRealName
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    In eliminating both the mystery of its early years and the restless avant garde spirit of 90's times, U2 leaves just exactly what U2 haters probably felt the band made all along: midtempo, largely hookless adult corporate pop. It's a shame to see the detractors proved right. Where is this depth?. Simply, nobody can describe this as groundbreaking or original. It's just In eliminating both the mystery of its early years and the restless avant garde spirit of 90's times, U2 leaves just exactly what U2 haters probably felt the band made all along: midtempo, largely hookless adult corporate pop. It's a shame to see the detractors proved right. Where is this depth?. Simply, nobody can describe this as groundbreaking or original. It's just recycling past glories in search of a `classic' sounding album that fan base should be able to embrace. It's 11 'new mixes' - as bad as those ones presented on 'Best of?' 1990-2000 - of ATYCLB. The production values on this lame attempt at U2 are equally indefensible. Every single track sounds like it could have been written, I mean, copy-paste on a laptop, and much needed qualities such as 'Please' and 'The Fly' are completely non-existent. It's hard to figure out how U2 sees itself in 2004; whether it has an idea of where it wants to go, musically, or even whether it realizes that it's making music that's far removed from the forward-thinking ambition that defined its amazing sound as 90's underrated POP. I think MONEY & COMPLACENCY have taken its toll. A big dissappointment… Expand
  12. WebTheEndOfTheWorld
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    The U2 mystery has gone. Apart from being a quartet of forty-something blokes with the same trademark guitars and an immense back catalogue, their purpose seems unclear. Unfortunately, this dull album shows this lack of purpose to have reached crippling levels. At times it's as if as the band, lost as to their true identity, start playing what they think U2 should be playing. It The U2 mystery has gone. Apart from being a quartet of forty-something blokes with the same trademark guitars and an immense back catalogue, their purpose seems unclear. Unfortunately, this dull album shows this lack of purpose to have reached crippling levels. At times it's as if as the band, lost as to their true identity, start playing what they think U2 should be playing. It sounds so familiar. No substance at all. It's just marketing, fashion, Grammy Awards, etc. The album quickly descends into an uninspiring mid-tempo plod. The overall impression is that they've forgotten about the songs and preoccupied themselves worrying about the textures. Stuck between second-guessing their audience's expectations and where they actual want to travel, they end up in a cul-de-sac of their own making. Stuck In A Moment They Don't Want To Get Out Of.… Expand
  13. SteveH
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    Everything you know is wrong. Or so U2 claimed on the multi-media overload intro sequence of the Zoo TV tour back in 1992. To put it more accurately and adapt that post-modern adage for U2's ninth album, everything you've read is wrong. Because, despite the almost universal hyperbole that has greeted HTDAAB - courtesy of Rolling Stone, New Musical Express, Billboard, etc -this Everything you know is wrong. Or so U2 claimed on the multi-media overload intro sequence of the Zoo TV tour back in 1992. To put it more accurately and adapt that post-modern adage for U2's ninth album, everything you've read is wrong. Because, despite the almost universal hyperbole that has greeted HTDAAB - courtesy of Rolling Stone, New Musical Express, Billboard, etc -this far from being even a decent album. Certainly their worst album, by U2's stratospheric 80s and 90s standards. HTDAAB: rolls past like a spanking red carpet, limped on by leaden-footed royalty. An early affair, a hazy infatuation, that has since bloated into comfortable taking-for-granted. As with all ubiquitous products, the familiarity of logos, slogans, and icons eventually supplants whatever original feelings we may have had. This U2 sellouts are, indeed, a universal product, much like the Catholic Church Bono humbly admires. The swoosh on The Edge's skully cap, and the golden arches of Bono's glasses spring to mind. The emtpyness of 'Vertigo' opens with bombast after Larry's sticks counting, and peaks with Bono's annoying cracking voice in the shouted coda. With 'Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own' Bono seems dead set on ruining U2's return with clichés. The vulnerability of Bono's rough voice become even more evident on 'A Man And A Woman', 'Original Of The Species', 'All Because Of You' and 'Yahweh'. I really don't know how the hell he likes the sound of his own voice. Maybe he feel numb, comfortably numb. This mainstream album is so predictable, safe, radio-friendly, and uninspiring and uninspired. Still, this dull record is disliked even for the traditionalist fans that U2 lost by making daring and admirably masterpieces like 'Pop' and 'Zooropa'. PS: R.Johnson. Stop putting your childish reviews twice, that's pathetic. Thank You… Expand
  14. DerekE
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    U2 are selling out and playing what 16 years old kids want them to play. In other words, more ATYCLB stuff. Of course, those kids didn't live Achtung Baby times. Rather, they experienced ATYCLB times. They loved it, because they pretended to experience what we experienced back in 1987, 1991 or 1993. The same thing happen here. "It's a classic", "their third masterpiece", "best U2 are selling out and playing what 16 years old kids want them to play. In other words, more ATYCLB stuff. Of course, those kids didn't live Achtung Baby times. Rather, they experienced ATYCLB times. They loved it, because they pretended to experience what we experienced back in 1987, 1991 or 1993. The same thing happen here. "It's a classic", "their third masterpiece", "best since Achtung Baby", etc. Those reviews sound like written by a bunch of 16-17 years old mainstream fans who just listen to the album once before writing their snapshot lines. But in the end, I do believe those reviews are written by U2's marketing team. Just go to the first 100 reviews. Most of them were 5 stars ones...mmmm... U2 stopped releasing decent material with POP. Despite I'm not crazy for it ( I'd give it 4 stars ) at least they took worthy risks with that album. U2 are not worth paying any attention to anymore. They look more like GQ models than musicians. They don't sound unique anymore but merely a second rate "Rock" band. Everything on this album sounds recycled. And when you're in the musical recycling business, you truly do not grow or mature. So many critics mistake stagnation for growth and maturity, particularly for this album. Quite simply, HTDAAB is not growth. It is their worst regression ever. Stay away from this unless you are a die hard U2 and simply have to have just for the sake of having it, like those kids. U2 have become very rich and all of that money seems to have dulled their whole creative vein. I'm tired of listening to little teenybopper mainstreamers who listen to whatever MTV tells them to and not to what has quality tell me that U2 did not sell out. Surely they've got their Ipod and I-Tunes...… Expand
  15. ThomasJ
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    This album should be against the law for this to be packaged as U2. Bono's strained vocals ruin the album, and the songs are missing the whole talent they had back in the 80's and 90's. It's clear U2 have nothing else to prove, and they don't even want to. This album just shows their 2000 musical ignorance. U2 should be ashamed of even taking credit to these This album should be against the law for this to be packaged as U2. Bono's strained vocals ruin the album, and the songs are missing the whole talent they had back in the 80's and 90's. It's clear U2 have nothing else to prove, and they don't even want to. This album just shows their 2000 musical ignorance. U2 should be ashamed of even taking credit to these 'songs'. Consider this record to be the ultimate undoing of this once legendary band. Too bad their time have come and gone. And yet every time U2 appear, their adoring fanatics react to it like it came from the Holy Scriptures... dream it all up again instead… Expand
  16. ChrisC
    Feb 24, 2005
    2
    While the U2 of old broke new barriers with their landmark albums, on HTDAAB they are content to offer a second-grade rehash of their 80's works. To be honest, the first time I played this, I thought I was listening to a recording of some comedians on a sketch show doing an imitation of U2. Innovation is non-existent here. Cliche, boring and unfocused. The quality of all the songs on While the U2 of old broke new barriers with their landmark albums, on HTDAAB they are content to offer a second-grade rehash of their 80's works. To be honest, the first time I played this, I thought I was listening to a recording of some comedians on a sketch show doing an imitation of U2. Innovation is non-existent here. Cliche, boring and unfocused. The quality of all the songs on this disc would not get any other band in the world recorded by a hobby label. The attempt to update their used 'classic' sound became more important than making good music, and it resulted in songs that sound amateur and dated. Unlistenable commercial garbage. The lyrics are embarrassing and the vocals are far too poorly strained. U2 now slaves to mass media (have you seen the ridiculously stupid videos for the horrific new singles?) make Christina Aguilera seem like Aretha Franklin if you get my drift. I give this 2 stars because this isn't their worst album ever - that's ATYCLB - but it ranks below U2 80's and 90's standards. But don't forget U2 now show just another level of selling out.… Expand
  17. Dave
    Feb 24, 2005
    3
    I'm not going to say bad words against U2 members, but I have to say bad words about their music. My first toughts about this album were so so. But now, the more I listen it the more I dislike it. After 4 years ( the longer time between one album and another in U2's history, since between Zooropa and Pop were 3 1/2 years ) U2 give us such a fraud album, with radio friendly I'm not going to say bad words against U2 members, but I have to say bad words about their music. My first toughts about this album were so so. But now, the more I listen it the more I dislike it. After 4 years ( the longer time between one album and another in U2's history, since between Zooropa and Pop were 3 1/2 years ) U2 give us such a fraud album, with radio friendly songs, with no attitude nor new ideas. I really don't know what to say to express how bad I feel. I've been U2 fan since 1984 !!! I have 35 years old and I was used to be surprised with every U2 album until Pop, in 1997. Then they shifted to safe and more friendly music with All That You Can't Live Behind. Now with this album songs are very commercial intended and recorded, production is nothing special, as well other instruments like strings, keyboards, piano, etc. Is very annoying to listen Bono's voice now, trying to reach higher notes with his rough voice. Edge stopped to invent new guitars forever. Larry is boring, as well Adam. Guitars are always the same ones. Sorry for these words my friend, but this album is only an excuse for money… Expand
  18. Phillipe
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    I simply don't understand this hype concept, you know, Bono's words repeated again and again with any new album. This album is simply awful, showing a big shyness to make whole new music. Rather, this album is safe, weak and boring. Isn't something interesting and worth listen. By far the more interesting thing here is something new after 4 years, but sadly is not 100% at I simply don't understand this hype concept, you know, Bono's words repeated again and again with any new album. This album is simply awful, showing a big shyness to make whole new music. Rather, this album is safe, weak and boring. Isn't something interesting and worth listen. By far the more interesting thing here is something new after 4 years, but sadly is not 100% at all. This hits factory intended bother me, really. Where is exploration here ? where is excellence here ? where is innovation here ? rather, here I found exasperating evasive music exit for hits and money. U2 have park their car on the safe world of commercial singles, forgetting to communicate what happen in the present world, living in a cloud of fame and pleasure. This album overall is nothing but a terrible mistake fed by desire on more fame and more money. How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb is so boring, predictable, disposable and accessible.… Expand
  19. NatanielN
    Feb 24, 2005
    4
    So I'd be lying if I didn't at least give U2 credit for trying to rock on this CD. Unlike that last thing where all they did was mope about the current state of the world, this CD does try to pick it up a notch and make music that is actually powerful in the way the Joshua Tree was. Unfortunately, I feel like this CD is tired. Bono is not a politician, he's a musician, and So I'd be lying if I didn't at least give U2 credit for trying to rock on this CD. Unlike that last thing where all they did was mope about the current state of the world, this CD does try to pick it up a notch and make music that is actually powerful in the way the Joshua Tree was. Unfortunately, I feel like this CD is tired. Bono is not a politician, he's a musician, and I think it's time he realized this. There's a lot of the same old cliches about the current state of politics and the world and I'm not trying to be rude but we've all heard them before. I think that musicians need to stop acting like they have some amazingly profound idea about governments when really all they did was read someone else's idea in a newspaper and then act like it was their own. Bono is the king of this concept which he demonstrates to the fullest extent on this album. So while it does "rock" at times, the rocking is overshadowed by some drivel about love and some more about governments. But if you're a U2 fan you will enjoy this album because no matter how much those things don't appeal to me, I give them credit for being really good at what they do. And while Bono may have no place in world politics, at least he's been able to shed a little light on a few events for the bozos that don't actually get their news from newsworthy sources.… Expand
  20. SaffronFaerie
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    the people in u2 are so big and rich that they could put out whatever kind of album they want without really consulting with anyone. unfortunately, this seems to be excactly what they decided to do, and guess what? it sucks. they can't even count in spanish
  21. Ness
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    I used to love this group, but they are so OVER. Aside from 'Vertigo', which in and of itself gets painful to listen to after a few times, there is no reason to buy this album. Just buy the single. Honestly, what does U2 think? That they're so fab and rich they can just churn out any crap, slap some 'cool' sounding titles on songs and people will just eat it up? I used to love this group, but they are so OVER. Aside from 'Vertigo', which in and of itself gets painful to listen to after a few times, there is no reason to buy this album. Just buy the single. Honestly, what does U2 think? That they're so fab and rich they can just churn out any crap, slap some 'cool' sounding titles on songs and people will just eat it up? Apparently.… Expand
  22. RobertoC
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    Why so many fans think with albums like ATYCLB and this one HTDAAB 80's U2 is back ?. I think that sentence is pointless, there's no way for U2 to return to these days. U2 in the 80's had many things to say, both with music and lyrics, but now..."Yeah, Yeah, Yeah" at the end of Vertigo is something horrible !! by the way, Bono is far from 80's voice. This album is Why so many fans think with albums like ATYCLB and this one HTDAAB 80's U2 is back ?. I think that sentence is pointless, there's no way for U2 to return to these days. U2 in the 80's had many things to say, both with music and lyrics, but now..."Yeah, Yeah, Yeah" at the end of Vertigo is something horrible !! by the way, Bono is far from 80's voice. This album is inoffensive, inopportune, accessible, pop, false, and overall the worst possible way to celebrate their 25th birthday. I think a far better way could have been a remastered releasing of all their classic albums, from Boy until Pop, as well Live DVD's with previously unreleased footage ( Like Led Zeppelin DVD ). Is a shame, really. The fans can swallow any U2 hype, just because is something new, but that doesn't mean quality at all. There's no one memorable and unforgettable song here, like Pride ( in the name of love ), Sunday Bloody Sunday, One or Stay. Now is time for re-discovering underrated albums like Zooropa! or Pop, and bury this "new" U2. How so many fans can be blind, and say this is equal to Joshua Tree, Acthung Baby or Unforgettable Fire ? there's no new music here, no new guitars, no new style, is just another ATYCLB with a few spices by The Edge, but even he sounds like always here. The title was chosen obviously just for typical reviews like "this album is a bomb" and things like that. The more I listen the album, the more I lament to see what have they done these last years, wasting all the time staining, soiling, burying and their extraordinary career seeking for instantaneous grammy and money. It's been a long time in which U2 doesn't offer anything really new, neither with LPs nor with the live concerts, but having the great advantage of being a recognized and respected band throughout the world, U2 always will have fans that acclaim anything that they put on the radios, like this stupid "bomb".The title of this album must have been "How to dismantle a band who used to make music and surprise the world"… Expand
  23. MajorTom
    Feb 24, 2005
    3
    While this record isn't terrible, it is pretty bad for U2 standards. All songs here are mid to slow tempo and quite dull; none of the other 10 tracks have the energy that Vertigo has. Slow songs are not a bad thing, just listen to 'All That You Can't...', but the ones here are just plain boring. I miss the adventurous U2 of the early to mid '90s. In my opinion, While this record isn't terrible, it is pretty bad for U2 standards. All songs here are mid to slow tempo and quite dull; none of the other 10 tracks have the energy that Vertigo has. Slow songs are not a bad thing, just listen to 'All That You Can't...', but the ones here are just plain boring. I miss the adventurous U2 of the early to mid '90s. In my opinion, this record has been grosely overhyped and thus it's kind of disappointing when you finally get to listen to it. 'All because of you' sounds like a bad rip off of Bowie's 'Hang On To Yourself', 'A Man and A Woman' will put you to sleep faster than a Tool record. Guess all those 4 star reviews from Rolling Stone and the like really are nothing more than maintainace for a business relation. I'm not just bashing U2 for the sake of it. I think they are one of the greatest bands ever; Achtung Baby and Zooropa are among my favorite records of all time, I throughly enjoy All That You Can't and Joshua Tree, but this time i was genuinely disappointed… Expand
  24. MarceloF
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    U2 past their prime a long time ago. That´s clear after listening to this.
  25. Stateless
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    For those mainstream critics: Please stop marketing for U2, it´s shameful. This album should have been titled "How to dismantle a former glory career".
  26. Ryan
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    There have been very few records that have been hyped as much as this one in recent years. But the truth is that this is U2's "Let it Be". A lot of hype has been made about the fact that U2 is a return to the band's older days. But what all of this assumes is that the older days can be replicated with a few Edge's trademark guitars and keyboards. That assumption begs for a There have been very few records that have been hyped as much as this one in recent years. But the truth is that this is U2's "Let it Be". A lot of hype has been made about the fact that U2 is a return to the band's older days. But what all of this assumes is that the older days can be replicated with a few Edge's trademark guitars and keyboards. That assumption begs for a lot, though, and the fact that this album is full of poor lyrics that are extremely poor sung, all atop a poor mix of instruments. "Original Of The Species" comes off as the worst song "U2" have ever recorded, of course their semi-official magazine "Rolling Stone" aren't agree at all - have you noticed that every new U2 album is reviewed as their best effort at least in 10 years for those "critics"? -, but just about any other person with functional hearing. This is just bulls**t which might not even inspire you to pick up the album ever again after hearing it for the first time. It simply Doesn't measure up to U2 standards. It's worthy - as "Let it Be" - just in case you want to hear the musical document of a band's artistic breakup. This half-finished piece of copy-paste jobs from "All That You Can't Leave Behind" got the worst U2 album reviews ever, even worse than "Rattle & Hum". I agree with fans reviews. People just showed them that sometimes fans are right in criticizing their music, and the mass media are just as sellouts as the own band.… Expand
  27. WakeUpDeadU2
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    What's most frustrating is that many songs start out in the same trademark direction. It was worse than I expected. This stuff is easy. A 4 year wait for another mediocre U2 studio album. Almost unlistenable. I agree with most of fans here, HTDAAB is just an ATYCLB reissue with another name. U2 used to be cool, but they gradually have gotten less avant garde and more radio-friendly. What's most frustrating is that many songs start out in the same trademark direction. It was worse than I expected. This stuff is easy. A 4 year wait for another mediocre U2 studio album. Almost unlistenable. I agree with most of fans here, HTDAAB is just an ATYCLB reissue with another name. U2 used to be cool, but they gradually have gotten less avant garde and more radio-friendly. This one is just terrible. I dare to say it's their worst effort ever. I can't stand this statement of mediocrity. U2 have become in that horrible mainstream music that you constantly pretend to love on your highschool, you know, among female friends and all that. U2 say they are merely protecting the world, but it comes off as being very greedy. I am all for free market and capitalism, but how much money do these sellouts need?. They make majority of their money from touring, if they never made another album again, they would still collect huge amounts of money from royalites and touring. The most dissapointing thing about this U2 is the horrible glamorization of the band. U2 have become in glammy pop mainstream 'artists'.… Expand
  28. AndrewJ
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    I don't understand why so many music critics continue to lavish praise on U2. I don't hear anything new or exciting on "How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb". It's tired,overdone,boring,bland,and pompous. I don't like one song on it. "Vertigo" sounds horrible to me,but it's the best they have to offer. "Yahweh" is one of the worst songs they've ever done. All the I don't understand why so many music critics continue to lavish praise on U2. I don't hear anything new or exciting on "How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb". It's tired,overdone,boring,bland,and pompous. I don't like one song on it. "Vertigo" sounds horrible to me,but it's the best they have to offer. "Yahweh" is one of the worst songs they've ever done. All the songs in between just put me to sleep. The best thing about trying to listen to the album is that it cures my insomnia. Bono said he'd know it was time for U2 to hang it up when they did two bad albums in a row. He's lucky "All That You Can't Leave Behind" was a decent album or U2'd have to retire now. I'm not going to listen to the hype any more. The critics who call every new U2 album the best one in years are always wrong. They've said it about every album since "Boy" and they've been wrong every time.… Expand
  29. GeorgeT
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    I wish the aforementioned atomic bomb was remantled and aimed directly at U2.The bilingual lyrics in the beginning of Vertigo could be no more pointless and innane than what I had for dinner two years ago.Being berated with obviously "well-thought out" lyrics like "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah..." at the end of their most "promising" track, makes me envision Bono hard at work at a desk some where I wish the aforementioned atomic bomb was remantled and aimed directly at U2.The bilingual lyrics in the beginning of Vertigo could be no more pointless and innane than what I had for dinner two years ago.Being berated with obviously "well-thought out" lyrics like "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah..." at the end of their most "promising" track, makes me envision Bono hard at work at a desk some where writing down this lyrical garbage.Other than the truly overplayed, over-rated, and over done Vertigo, which needed to be truly lampooned, the other songs are literally not worth my most wasted minute.Please for the continuing sake of all types of music I beg of any reader; Do Not Buy This Trash!… Expand
  30. Gary
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    This is just a mindless album. It is a desperate attempt to try to parody earlier recordings. However, after two tracks it starts to blend into one of the worst U2 songs ever - Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own - that just does not seem to be going anywhere. Periodically there are shameless attempts at pop commercial singles. I have never been more let down from a band then I This is just a mindless album. It is a desperate attempt to try to parody earlier recordings. However, after two tracks it starts to blend into one of the worst U2 songs ever - Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own - that just does not seem to be going anywhere. Periodically there are shameless attempts at pop commercial singles. I have never been more let down from a band then I was by the so-called "U2" on this one. How could one explain how shallow and meaningless their music became after All That You Can't Leave Behind ? They gave up on art and opted for being ROCK ICONS, a damnable pity if there ever was one. If I were 80s Bono I would be embarrassed to even be associated with the ( now commercialized ) name U2, who unfairly subjected us to this torture they call a "U2" record… Expand
  31. NeilS
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    This lame album is the worst block of U2 music to date. Songs such as 'Vertigo' demonstrate that Bono was slipping into as he wrote song after song that was more suited for sell-out stadium shows than it was great music or great art. His lyrics are laughable. Just read what he is singing on 'Vertigo' or 'All Because Of You'. As irrelevant as the whole album. This lame album is the worst block of U2 music to date. Songs such as 'Vertigo' demonstrate that Bono was slipping into as he wrote song after song that was more suited for sell-out stadium shows than it was great music or great art. His lyrics are laughable. Just read what he is singing on 'Vertigo' or 'All Because Of You'. As irrelevant as the whole album. U2 had always been about challenge. Not all four of them were the greatest musicians ever ( except for The Edge, who is - well... WAS a truly great guitar player ), but they always tried to push themselves just beyond their niches and into something new and dangerous. How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb absolutely couldn't be more contrary. Everything about this album is flat and predictable as All That You Can't Leave Behind. Applying such adjectives to U2's music would have seemed unthinkable in the 80s and 90s. But hey, here we are! U2 have become self-important yuppie-rock that make better magazine covers than albums… Expand
  32. TroyD
    Feb 26, 2005
    6
    Dissapointing. That said, the lead single, Vertigo, blew me away. U2's best rocker in years... but the rest of the album is just a bunch U2's poorer efforts. Not worth waiting 4 years for.
  33. GaryW
    Feb 27, 2005
    10
    This album is one of their harder albums. After ATYCLB the band was revived with music that was closer to their roots. This on the other hand sounds like its from the 70's. I regret that some songs ("All Because of You")are a bit predictible. But the huge sound emiting from the guitar makes up for it. Like all of thair albums its not so much the music but the lyrics that make make This album is one of their harder albums. After ATYCLB the band was revived with music that was closer to their roots. This on the other hand sounds like its from the 70's. I regret that some songs ("All Because of You")are a bit predictible. But the huge sound emiting from the guitar makes up for it. Like all of thair albums its not so much the music but the lyrics that make make the album. They talk about real subjects and are incredibly deep. If you like poetry this is it. Underneath the surface these songs is a new life with every different interpretation. It is truley amazing to listen to what they have to say. And if poetry isnt what you are into I would still recomend this album due to its powerful music and electrifying sound. For the long time fans there is still a hint of their previous work imbeded into some there tunes. Especially the lighter songs such as "All Because of You". This album may not be considered their best, and even if you thought it was their weakest album. This is solid, and highly recomend HTDAAB. It is well worth $15… Expand
  34. JamesU
    Feb 27, 2005
    10
    I agree with a previous post that this one sort of grows on you. This is one of my favorite U2 albums but I wouldn't personally go quite so far as to say it's their best. Obviously most have heard a couple tracks from the album such as "Vertigo" and "Sometimes you can't make it on your Own" but the other tracks are excellent as well. This CD has an interesting affect on me I agree with a previous post that this one sort of grows on you. This is one of my favorite U2 albums but I wouldn't personally go quite so far as to say it's their best. Obviously most have heard a couple tracks from the album such as "Vertigo" and "Sometimes you can't make it on your Own" but the other tracks are excellent as well. This CD has an interesting affect on me in that some tracks remind me of the old U2 sound and others hold true to the newer music, which I think is why I like it so much. All in all I would highly recommend this album if you are a U2 fan, I even know some non-fans who have enjoyed it immensely. BTW I also agree that it's silly to knock the album on the basis of not liking commercials, ticket sales problems etc., buy the album and let the quality speak for itself… Expand
  35. RoyM
    Apr 24, 2005
    10
    Great Pop music. One of thier most consistent albums.
  36. JosephD
    May 15, 2005
    10
    U2 is cool stuff and yes I am 20 not 50. The bomb is full of good tunes containing amazing sonic guitat rifts and powerful vocals from one of the greatest rock singers of all time. U2 are still relivent as ever and they have the talent and tecnique to back their claim to be the bigest band in the world up
  37. LionelW
    May 27, 2005
    0
    This is U2...so it´s must be "Their best album"...well... at least until they´ll release their next one probably in 2006... that album will be "Their best album"... don´t forget it.
  38. EDBuratto
    Jun 15, 2005
    10
    A brilliant record by all accounts. It's better than ATYCLB, not quite as good as Achtung Baby, but definately a classic by any measure; this is one of u2's strongest albums to date. It was the best album released in 2004, and better than anything released so far in 2005. Enjoy!
  39. EliM
    Jun 17, 2005
    1
    More of the same ATYCLB crap
  40. zainr
    Jun 21, 2005
    10
    great
  41. ChriscoM
    Aug 26, 2005
    2
    Vertigo is a very misleading track that doesn't at all foreshadow the rest of the album. I'd rather listen to "pop" or "the passengers" anytime than force my way through this one. The drums and percussion are lost in the mix somewhere.
  42. DaneR
    Sep 23, 2005
    10
    Is the best album of 2004
  43. williamt
    Sep 26, 2005
    0
    What a waste of money- what a sell out to the music companies. here is Bono saying F**k you just give me you money
  44. JonathanH
    Dec 9, 2006
    0
    Probably the most dissapointing ALBUM of all time. Edge all I can say is we don't want to hear tired cliche'd 80s guitar licks with no juice that go "din din dindin a din ting ting ting". Last word here: go back to the studio, cancel the last two albums from your cataloghe and go back into the studio and finish of "POP" and then release a DVD for that tour you cheapskates. With Probably the most dissapointing ALBUM of all time. Edge all I can say is we don't want to hear tired cliche'd 80s guitar licks with no juice that go "din din dindin a din ting ting ting". Last word here: go back to the studio, cancel the last two albums from your cataloghe and go back into the studio and finish of "POP" and then release a DVD for that tour you cheapskates. With decent picture quality (ZOO TV 2006 DVD anyone?)… Expand
  45. masamitsua
    Feb 4, 2006
    10
    Songs like miracle drug and City of Blinding Lights rocks!
  46. MusicLover
    Oct 21, 2007
    5
    I was so excited when I first got this album. Then I listened to it & all I felt was disappointment. I expected more from U2. I still got faith in Bono & the gang, though.
  47. GuyE
    Feb 13, 2007
    8
    Of course this doesnt live up to The Joshua Tree or The Unforgettable Fire, but then again, what does? This is actually a lot better than a lot of new music out there and while it pales in comparison to some of their older work it is still well worth a listen.
  48. CarlosM.
    Jun 29, 2007
    10
    One of the latest hight prices of U2....
  49. JohnK
    Feb 19, 2009
    0
    I love U2. I hate this album. I even liked Pop and I hate this album. The difference? The lyrics all the way. Pop had interesting lyrics, this has boring, straightforward and unpoetic. It's a terrible, terrible album.
  50. MCPotDude
    Nov 21, 2004
    10
    It's brilliant. The highs and lows of the album work together to ultimately make this yet another masterpeice for this quartet that gets better like vintage wine. Bravo boys ... Bravo!
  51. georges
    Nov 21, 2004
    7
    mixing old chime like guitar sounds with rich overdrive the boys have done it again. a good effort and although they might not have the passion of youth anymore, i think they have a new issue on the horizon, middle age
  52. DavidM
    Nov 22, 2004
    10
    Great album!!
  53. paolon
    Nov 22, 2004
    10
    Brilliant! If you don't love what you're hearing go to a doctor. I'm floored!
  54. maxf
    Nov 22, 2004
    9
    This CD is pretty sweet, it has some slow and dancing tunes. It is one to be heard and listened to on new years eve and day.
  55. Martin
    Nov 22, 2004
    9
    Lovin' it, don't care if it's "too melodramatic" or "unadventurous", it's genuine U2 and that's all I need.. :)
  56. DavidL
    Nov 23, 2004
    10
    U2 has set a very high standard for themselves. They have managed to reach it once again. HTDAAB is not the best they've ever done, but it's still really good-the best since Achtung Baby. The trademark chiming guitars and soaring vocals give U2 fans what they want. U2 is not only the last relevant band of their era, they're still the best band out there.
  57. ErwinK
    Nov 23, 2004
    8
    Good album...... but I kind of miss the Achtung Baby post-modern sexiness and excesses, the walls of televisions - EVERYTHING YOU KNOW IS WRONG - the silhouette of a madman against a blue static TV screen as Zoo Station screeches - WATCH MORE TV - the dissonance, the interference, the spectacle and experimentation, the Fly sunglasses - WHAT DO YOU WANT - Bono's ego absorbed in a Good album...... but I kind of miss the Achtung Baby post-modern sexiness and excesses, the walls of televisions - EVERYTHING YOU KNOW IS WRONG - the silhouette of a madman against a blue static TV screen as Zoo Station screeches - WATCH MORE TV - the dissonance, the interference, the spectacle and experimentation, the Fly sunglasses - WHAT DO YOU WANT - Bono's ego absorbed in a catharthis of technology, gold llama suits, red horns and flirting with the devil........ but hey maybe that's just me.… Expand
  58. dmandwoman
    Nov 23, 2004
    9
    Great tunes! Beautiful emotion in words and music. Not certain it's an Achtung Baby or Joshua Tree though. But, even if it's close to those 2 albums, it's a major achievement.
  59. [Anonymous]
    Nov 24, 2004
    0
    I used to love U2 so much. I'm not sure if I've wised up or if they have descended into the realms of the retarded. This album is junk. While some of the tunes are OK, Bono's lyrics are a series of painful couplets that with have you reaching for the crack pipe to drown it all out.
  60. Daniel
    Nov 24, 2004
    10
    What this planet needs....
  61. MikeD
    Nov 25, 2004
    10
    Brilliant, justifies the tag "best band in the world" - by a long way
  62. EstebanC
    Nov 25, 2004
    10
    Great Lyrics, Maybe not really appreciated with one listen, but it grows and grows and grows.
  63. AndrewA
    Nov 25, 2004
    9
    yep, it is disappointing. But it has got to be the best rock album out there. I dont hear any real radio pounding stuff. It does go deep mind you and I think not in a commercial way. More like a clarification of what thev'e done and they have creative control over it. I sense a serious block buster in the making. This one is like a must hear also. I like the craftwork that went into yep, it is disappointing. But it has got to be the best rock album out there. I dont hear any real radio pounding stuff. It does go deep mind you and I think not in a commercial way. More like a clarification of what thev'e done and they have creative control over it. I sense a serious block buster in the making. This one is like a must hear also. I like the craftwork that went into it. I like the emotional clarity also. Still it is a bit like even with the very best on the table the heart is only casually present. It makes it to the 9 slot but I want commitment for the next/classic level. … Expand
  64. Johan
    Nov 25, 2004
    9
    Hard to judge a classic earth moving album before the first 100 listenings...but I'm getting there...
  65. DanM
    Nov 26, 2004
    10
    Tops Joshua Tree and Achtung, Baby with its sheer passion. Great music. Ref. the "Freedom has a scent ..." line that's so controversial, it's all part of the overall theme of the album. "Atomic Bomb" is one for the ages.
  66. Mensch
    Nov 27, 2004
    9
    Anyone who can listen to Bono's ode to his father -- "Can you hear me when I sing; You?re the reason I sing; You?re the reason why the opera is in me" from "Sometimes You Can't Make It on Your Own" without getting chills will never appreciate U2. The inconsistency keeps this album from being a classic, but it is fantastic nonetheless.
  67. GuenterO
    Nov 27, 2004
    10
    Edge better than ever. Great produced. Better than ATYCLB.
  68. JorisV.
    Nov 27, 2004
    7
    Good cd, but can't tip Achtung Baby or The Joshua Tree, unless some reviewers who acclaim this would be their best cd... Therefor "...Bomb" has to few classic standout tracks, there's no song on it that could stand time like one or pride. Despite this, this is a coherent, sometimes genius album.
  69. allens
    Nov 28, 2004
    8
    Dear Metacritic editors, I hope you don't mind if I digress a bit about the group-think that is going on with these reviewers. Essentially 'Atomic Bomb' is a great album ..blah blah.. 8/10, but what is it with every single review panning 'Pop' that it was some monstrous pathetic failure? Someone wants to believe that U2 must have had some terrible musical glut in Dear Metacritic editors, I hope you don't mind if I digress a bit about the group-think that is going on with these reviewers. Essentially 'Atomic Bomb' is a great album ..blah blah.. 8/10, but what is it with every single review panning 'Pop' that it was some monstrous pathetic failure? Someone wants to believe that U2 must have had some terrible musical glut in their careers, and everyone includes it to make their review sound good. In a sense every review I have read seems to have been created from some holier-than-thou template on how to write about U2's musical career.... 'Pop' was good dammit! … Expand
  70. erinf
    Nov 28, 2004
    0
    I am seriously pissed at my former favorite band. After giving this one listen (verdict: bad), another (verdict: bad and boring), and a third (verdict: bad, boring AND soulless)....I gave up and handed the CD to my thirty nine year old aunt. I think she'll appreciate U2's version of adult contemporary more than I ever will. Every note in the songs is bent towards Bono's I am seriously pissed at my former favorite band. After giving this one listen (verdict: bad), another (verdict: bad and boring), and a third (verdict: bad, boring AND soulless)....I gave up and handed the CD to my thirty nine year old aunt. I think she'll appreciate U2's version of adult contemporary more than I ever will. Every note in the songs is bent towards Bono's vocal pyrotechnics, but unfortunately the songs are so stripped of political and social consciousness, he just sounds like a warbling has been. Bono has become Macphisto, and anyone who doesn't see that doesn't deserve to call themselves a U2 fan. … Expand
  71. GregG
    Dec 1, 2004
    9
    "Bomb" is a success in the sense that there are very few bad tracks, the album is altogether very consistently good. "Bomb" however fails slightly in delivering the ultra-mega-super tracks that have been scarce throughout U2's previous albums. There is no "Bad" or "Bloody Sunday" or "With or Without You" on this album, but tracks like "A Man and A Woman" and "Sometimes You Can't "Bomb" is a success in the sense that there are very few bad tracks, the album is altogether very consistently good. "Bomb" however fails slightly in delivering the ultra-mega-super tracks that have been scarce throughout U2's previous albums. There is no "Bad" or "Bloody Sunday" or "With or Without You" on this album, but tracks like "A Man and A Woman" and "Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own" are perfectly up to U2's precedence.… Expand
  72. EdwardM
    Dec 1, 2004
    10
    This album is probably one of the most consistent and listenable U2 albums, or rock albums, for that matter, ever. At first I wasn't enthralled, but it is their most human and lyrically hopeful ever. Sonically, it's right there under Achtung. It is eminently coherent and is an album that few artists can put out there - mind-blowing!
  73. mudmanj
    Dec 2, 2004
    10
    Classic!
  74. JohnL
    Dec 30, 2004
    10
    All Because of You, Vertigo, and Love and Peace or Else are wonderful kicks in the pants softened by the touching One Step Closer and Miracle Drug.
  75. JohnB
    Dec 6, 2004
    8
    I agree not their strongest ever; however; the songs slowly reveal themselves with every consecutive listen. I believe this will slot into the number three spot as a lot of people's favourite album. Nice effort!
  76. MarguarithaK
    Dec 6, 2004
    10
    The sincerity is in the voice. This world needs more of that.
  77. DavidB
    Jan 12, 2005
    10
    as good or better than Joshua Tree
  78. BrennanY
    Jan 22, 2005
    10
    I listened to this album for the first time in the car. I got as a present for my birthday and had been waiting to hear "Vertigo" again for about the 10,000th time. The first time through the CD, I was skeptical, and it was a toss up as to wheather the CD was worth the wait. So, I listened to it again... and again... and again... and again... and again. after the 3rd or 4th time listening I listened to this album for the first time in the car. I got as a present for my birthday and had been waiting to hear "Vertigo" again for about the 10,000th time. The first time through the CD, I was skeptical, and it was a toss up as to wheather the CD was worth the wait. So, I listened to it again... and again... and again... and again... and again. after the 3rd or 4th time listening to the songs, they grew on me. Now I realize the uniqueness (if that's a word) of their songs, and I must say, it is borderline, if not all out, genius.... and "Vertigo" is no longer my favorite song. Strike up the band!!! U2 is back in full force. They've done it again.… Expand
  79. Julia
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    This soup offers nothing new to the current music scene, presenting weak compositions that lack originality and innovation. It certainly doesn`t deserve all the overexposure it got, since it has been awhile since U2 created something truly remarkable and cutting edge (I agree with those ones whom say their last worthy album was Pop, in 1997). Far from stunning, this mainstream album has This soup offers nothing new to the current music scene, presenting weak compositions that lack originality and innovation. It certainly doesn`t deserve all the overexposure it got, since it has been awhile since U2 created something truly remarkable and cutting edge (I agree with those ones whom say their last worthy album was Pop, in 1997). Far from stunning, this mainstream album has nothing remarkable, most of the moments are just banal pop tunes and far from memorable. Plus Bono's voice here sounds too strained. What's more, a couple of the tracks on the disc are positively atrocious (the vapid 'SYCMOYO' (possibly getting my vote as the worst U2 track ever, with ATYCLB's 'Grace' coming 2nd) and equally trite and embarrassing 'OOTS'). The remainder of the tracks on the disc range from below average to forgettable. For worse, the limitations in their song writing ability is becoming ever more evident. Listen to 'Vertigo': we've all heard countless times, and yes it grows more annoying with every listen. The chorus line pretty much sums up Bono's lyrical empyness for the album - downright lazy and easy. What happenned to the adventurous band, their intriguingly good lyrics, the expect-the-unexpected feel of their albums. Achtung baby, Zooropa and Pop were amazing because of these qualities. This crap doesn't push much of anything - except U2's unit shifting status in the biz.… Expand
  80. Heartland
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    U2 were surely among the best musicians during those 80s and 90s years. And now what? Is this the best that they can do? Aren't they ashamed of themselves? And what about you, U2 fans? I've been checking out some of the reviews here, and I sit in disbelief as I read lines like "back at their best", " great album": what are you talking about? Can you compare this stuff to Achtung U2 were surely among the best musicians during those 80s and 90s years. And now what? Is this the best that they can do? Aren't they ashamed of themselves? And what about you, U2 fans? I've been checking out some of the reviews here, and I sit in disbelief as I read lines like "back at their best", " great album": what are you talking about? Can you compare this stuff to Achtung Baby, The Joshua Tree or Pop?. Do you really believe this s**t is good?. The reviewers whom seem to agree with me are right, you are trying to persuade yourself it is. Because it's not. Firstly, it's too commercial, and that's proved by the huge financial investment on videos, aimed to target those persons who form their music culture by watching MTV (the same ones who think Britney Spears, Blink 182, Maroon 5 or Robbie Williams are the best musicians around). Secondly, they lack ideas and inspiration. But, more importantly, the quality of their music has so clearly decreased, because songs like 'Vertigo' and 'All Because Of You' do NOT have the "sound that made them one of the worlds biggest bands in the eighties", (how can some fans say that 'Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own' is the 'One' or 'With Or Without You' of this collection, that is almost criminal). Here are a bunch of insipid tunes which meander about without ever really finding a decent melody. 'Vertigo', 'Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own', 'A Man And A Woman', 'Love And Peace Or Else', 'One Step Closer' and 'Original Of The Species' are perhaps the most undertuneful worst songs ever made by U2. This latest "effort"is frankly insulting. A low-octane rehash of the ideas on the lame All That You Can't Leave Behind. None of those commercial tracks stand out and slap you in the face at all. Moreover, it's absolutely irritating to listen to Bono straining his thin voice to hit the high notes. Yet some people pretend to like this album because it is U2 and no matter what they ever release it will be liked... Sheeps.… Expand
  81. DavidS
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    A whole unfocused and reeks of taking the easy road to success once again. They didn't realize that most of U2 fans did not approve of what they did on "All That You Can't Leave Behind" - because of that album sales - so they did the whole same cocktail for this garbage. This album had tons of hype before its release. But I don't think it lived up to any of it. The A whole unfocused and reeks of taking the easy road to success once again. They didn't realize that most of U2 fans did not approve of what they did on "All That You Can't Leave Behind" - because of that album sales - so they did the whole same cocktail for this garbage. This album had tons of hype before its release. But I don't think it lived up to any of it. The songwriting skill exhibited on this album is nothing compared to U2's past. This songwriting is just terrible. For worse, Bono's awful singing is truly untolerable ( listen to the pitiful track 3 at 3:18-4:36; the annoying track 4 at 2:37-2:46 and 3:01-3:13; the crappy track 6 at 2:12-3:16; the WHOLE filler track 7; track 8 at 3:45-4:01; the awful track 10 at 1:17-1:28, 2:46-3:50; and the lame track 11 at every time that Bono sings the word 'Yahweh' ). This mainstream album is more than not (ab)used as a quick means of fulfilling contractual obligations, or padding the record label's fourth-quarter budget. Sometimes it's better to be thought of as a washed out band than to release a crappy album and remove all doubt. At times, this bulls**t sounds like a band in their studio singing out whatever comes to mind - 'Vertigo' for example, and just banging on instruments randomly, repeating the same kind of songs that they used in "All That You Can't Leave Behind". I guess they were too busy pretending to be 'the biggest band in the world' and all that silly hype. PLEASE U2 RETIRE NOW ! We don't want any unnecessary 'Vertigo Tour DVD' nor another "All That You Can't Leave Behind" re-issue. You're disgracing your glory past ( 1980-1998 ). Thank You… Expand
  82. Randall
    Feb 24, 2005
    1
    'Pop' as it seems is the last good U2 album there really ever was. 1 Star Is Being Generous. This crap just leaves you feeling angry over the money that you wasted. It's abominable. Literally hundreds of the same boring guitars, horrible singing and screaming all over the place, stupid lyrics, miserable 'music', and filler production. Long-time fans already hate 'Pop' as it seems is the last good U2 album there really ever was. 1 Star Is Being Generous. This crap just leaves you feeling angry over the money that you wasted. It's abominable. Literally hundreds of the same boring guitars, horrible singing and screaming all over the place, stupid lyrics, miserable 'music', and filler production. Long-time fans already hate it, the casual listener will dismiss it as a cheap gimmick for sales. Please, don't be dumbest person in the world for even thinking about about buying this piece of overhyped crap. I gladly abandoned this band in the same fashion in which they abandoned me. Please U2 retire for gods sake...you are an embarrasment.… Expand
  83. Gone
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    This crap is a desperate and bold attempt to get a younger and more innocent audience by the means of sounding more mainstream. The thing that bothers me the most is that they agonized over this album. I was contstantly on their website over the last year watching all their news and interviews with the band, and I got the impression that this was gonna be something really special This crap is a desperate and bold attempt to get a younger and more innocent audience by the means of sounding more mainstream. The thing that bothers me the most is that they agonized over this album. I was contstantly on their website over the last year watching all their news and interviews with the band, and I got the impression that this was gonna be something really special considering how much time and effort was being given. But the result ended up being what sounded like a reunion drinks in Bono's basement playing with some pawn shop equipment, out of ideas, dusted off some old pawn shop gear, pressed record, played for a couple hours, and called it a day. I think more time was spent designing the CD/DVD 'artwork' ( by the way, as awful as the music presented here ). My 59 years old father can sing far better than Bono. I don't know why they pretend to be 'ambassadors of justice and the human rights' with iPod commercials and sunglasses. This album is purely marketing that is propelling this heap of musical trash. Surely this album will find fans among devotees of elevator music, plastics convention soundtrack collectors and bored, fat peroxide frizzed housewives who appreciate the likes of Michael Bolton, Phil Collins, Sting, and many other sellouts 'artists'.… Expand
  84. VitoF
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    What has happened to the band that used to try hard to produce something different and exciting? This album is totally devoid of new tune.....of new direction...of new anything. They have become the epitome of corporate rock.
  85. Silence
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    Most of these boring songs (even the decent ones...which are far and few between) take forever to get going. In most of the songs, Bono sounds tired...like he's an aging rockstar who can't quite hit the notes like he used to. A lot of the melodies are mundane and meandering while the lyrics are pointless. A lot of the music isn't distinct either. The Edge seems to be making Most of these boring songs (even the decent ones...which are far and few between) take forever to get going. In most of the songs, Bono sounds tired...like he's an aging rockstar who can't quite hit the notes like he used to. A lot of the melodies are mundane and meandering while the lyrics are pointless. A lot of the music isn't distinct either. The Edge seems to be making up the guitar parts as he goes along on some songs and borrowing from bits-and-pieces of old U2 songs some of the others. There's a ton of piano/keyboards on this puppy...too much if you ask me. In fact, a lot of these songs sound more like B-side tracks. Very disappointing!. Where's the song-writing ability here ? Tired music, tired singing. This is the laziest U2 album ever. Time to quit U2, really.… Expand
  86. Shekhardhain
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    'How To Dismantle an Atomic Bomb' is so dissapointing because its merely a rehash of former glories, they barely challenge themselves to create an original sound, something they strived to do throughout their 1990s peak. Since 1999 U2 have been too pre-occupied with being "the biggest band in the world", has opposed to the best. The songs on 'How To Dismantle An Atomic 'How To Dismantle an Atomic Bomb' is so dissapointing because its merely a rehash of former glories, they barely challenge themselves to create an original sound, something they strived to do throughout their 1990s peak. Since 1999 U2 have been too pre-occupied with being "the biggest band in the world", has opposed to the best. The songs on 'How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb' show that U2 are obsessed with getting their music onto US radio and making it grammy-worthy, and so a lot of the album comes over has bland and boring adult pop. If you are new to U2 or are only familiar with ATYCLB you may well love this album (i'm sure the Grammy's will) but has a dedicated U2 fan it merely sounds like an attempt to make a 'worthy' album that will appeal to the mainstream masses.… Expand
  87. MaryS
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    Please understand, I love U2. I have loved them for many years. I remember when I first saw the vidieo for "Gloria". I enjoyed reading the review that listed the new song lyrics with older song lyrics, and I can not agree more. I miss being inspired by U2. I miss feelings chills when I hear one of their songs. Nothing compares to "Bad", "A Sort of Homecoming" or "Sunday, Bloody Sunday." I Please understand, I love U2. I have loved them for many years. I remember when I first saw the vidieo for "Gloria". I enjoyed reading the review that listed the new song lyrics with older song lyrics, and I can not agree more. I miss being inspired by U2. I miss feelings chills when I hear one of their songs. Nothing compares to "Bad", "A Sort of Homecoming" or "Sunday, Bloody Sunday." I hate that they have written a lyric like "As the boys play rock and roll" in Vertigo. U2 never had to identify their music as rock and roll before this. Pleae, listen to some older songs from U2, and see just how great they were at one time. It is ashame that Bono's head has gotten so big. Please watch the bands performance of the song "Sunday, Bloody Sunday" in the movie Rattle and Hum to see just how great U2 can be.… Expand
  88. TheWanderer
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    How long we will be at the mercy of this self-indulgent corporation called 'U2'?. The greed that comes from this sell-out band is palpable. www.u2.com says it all. With the blink of an eye U2 became a snapshot joke of their career as band who just wanted to create something unheared before with every new album. Now we have not different stuff to choose. They're playing it How long we will be at the mercy of this self-indulgent corporation called 'U2'?. The greed that comes from this sell-out band is palpable. www.u2.com says it all. With the blink of an eye U2 became a snapshot joke of their career as band who just wanted to create something unheared before with every new album. Now we have not different stuff to choose. They're playing it as safe as they can. Things have been the same since 2000, I mean, looks, videos, songs, concerts, interviews, crappy TV shows, radio-friendly stuff, hype, etc. Inevitably every band go downhill, sooner or later. U2 are now an obsolete band. The only thing that remains on these days is, sadly, the money machine. That machine works perfectly well, while the actual band sound more uninspired, bored and old than ever. This oven 2000 style has been so worn that every day more and more fans feel annoyed by U2. For worse, mass media - whom want to be a part of the U2's party, of course. U2 force everybody to play by THEIR rules, otherwise mass media won't get the money they want - have been done to try and make the actual U2 2000 look and sound far better than they can make, by raising every crappy U2 comeback as genuine return to their best times, roots or whatever. This stupid work on restoring this rotten band just increase fans dissapointment. These pitiful men have nothing from their 80's spirit. U2 have become a band with no principles or meaning. John Lennon did his best to TEAR DOWN his celebrity. To show his HUMANITY. Whereas Bono's wearing his annoying cowboy hat and sunglasses, posing. They just profess endless greed. U2 have been teasing us for years. U2 doing the Apple ad shows what desperate these Irish has-beens have become. Now these ancient, by rock star standards, sell-outs men from Ireland are truly freaked. You've really disappointed me U2. This isn't how you started out. Art is about risk. You've stopped risking. You've gone into the insurance business. I can no longer believe in you. I'd rather watch Steve Jobs introduce products that are going to change my life than watch you shill to insure your status in a phony pop music landscape.… Expand
  89. Dainbeat
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    The lyrics are terrible, Bono`s voice is a shadow of what it used to be, and songwriting seem to have been going downhill since 2000. can't believe that some people actually consider this to be a good album, let alone one of U2's best. Give me a break! Is there a worse song in their entire catalog than Original Of The Species? I certainly don't think so. Production is The lyrics are terrible, Bono`s voice is a shadow of what it used to be, and songwriting seem to have been going downhill since 2000. can't believe that some people actually consider this to be a good album, let alone one of U2's best. Give me a break! Is there a worse song in their entire catalog than Original Of The Species? I certainly don't think so. Production is pretty bad, even considering this is actually an ATYCLB re-work recording. Not athmospheric, just annoying. Bono is just irritating to say the least. Music is so boring and predictable. Just something we`ve been hearing since their annoying ATYCLB, their most overrated album ever. This may be one of the worst albums ever made. The only thing good about this record is that it eventually ends. Every single song on it is a miserable experience devoid of melody. After I purchased this piece of trash I could only say to myself "this cd cost me two hours of my pay". After that I vowed to save anyone else from making the same mistake. Do yourself a favor and buy anything from 1980-1998 and avoid making eye contact with this waste of plastic. You will only loose 49 minute of your life for nothing.… Expand
  90. Dean
    Feb 24, 2005
    0
    Worst piece of corporate garbage I´ve ever heard
  91. DanielP
    Apr 13, 2005
    10
    I was never a huge man of U2, in fact it was All That You Can't Leave Behind that actaully got me into the band. Beautiful Day has to be one of my all time favourite songs, while Stuck In A Moment You Can't Get Out Of, Elevation and Walk On were also terrific. When How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb was finally released and I heard Vertigo for the first time, I knew I wanted it. On I was never a huge man of U2, in fact it was All That You Can't Leave Behind that actaully got me into the band. Beautiful Day has to be one of my all time favourite songs, while Stuck In A Moment You Can't Get Out Of, Elevation and Walk On were also terrific. When How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb was finally released and I heard Vertigo for the first time, I knew I wanted it. On purchase, I noticed that it was a 2CD set - it included a DVD on the making of the album and five four film clips. Well worth the $20 I paid! Vertigo is a terrific song, and it was acknowleged by winning rock song of the year. It was this albums' Elevation. Miracle Drug is a lyrical masterpiece, and very likeable. Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own is also very good, but I wouldn't have thought it was going to be released as a single. Love And Peace Or Else I hated at first, but I now enjoy it throughly, its a great song and fun to sing along to. I didn't think that any song from this album would pass Beautiful Day as my favourote U2 song, but City Of Blinding Lights is truly a classic song. I hope this gets released as a single, as it is the best song on the album and doesn't have any faults. All Because Of You is a great song, something you would play at parties. Really enjoyable and great to listen too. A Man And A Woman is more stripped-down than the others, and a tad darker, but still a good song. The verses are great. Crumbs From Your Table is another single-worthy song from the album. Easy and fun to listen to, and a very likeable track. One Step Closer was the only song that I didn't really like. I found it quite boring, with no real 'fizz' to it. But it blends in well, and I still wouldn't skip the track. Original Of The Species was a bit weird to me at first, it isn't your traditional type of song what with its three or so chorus' but it grew on me and now I enjoy it. Yahweh is a great way to end the album. A soothing track, easy on the ears, and a song everybody can like. In conlusion, I must say that this CD is one of the very best in my collection (and I have roughly 55 CDs).… Expand
  92. leons
    May 17, 2005
    10
    Excellent album, great songs, is U2 !
  93. Tofiks
    Jun 13, 2005
    8
    Its not so good as "Joshua Tree" or "Achtung Baby" but it's not a bad record.
  94. DavidC
    Jun 24, 2005
    8
    I am disappointed with how those people who claimed to be "U2" fans giving this album a 0 or 1. Use a little bit of your brain is helpful - anything that sells can be called "pop", metallica is pop, Ozzy Osbourne is pop too - so whats wrong with trying to create popular music? Being in the business for some 20 odd years, U2 knows how to make melodies - this album has it too. It I am disappointed with how those people who claimed to be "U2" fans giving this album a 0 or 1. Use a little bit of your brain is helpful - anything that sells can be called "pop", metallica is pop, Ozzy Osbourne is pop too - so whats wrong with trying to create popular music? Being in the business for some 20 odd years, U2 knows how to make melodies - this album has it too. It doesn't catch much fire at the first few listen, but it grows on you. My first U2 CD is best of 1980~1990, and it took at least 6 months before i started to appriciate it. When Achtung Baby came out, you would be suprised how many people was dissapointed because they sound too dance floor, but no one here doesn't claim it's a classic. Back to this album. Personally it at least deserve an 8 for its clever songcraft, they never lose it anywhere. However, there are a few weaknesses - Bono was losing his best at singing, since All that You Can't leave behind and a bit of "pop". But the edge doesn't suffer from older fingers - trust me, i am a guitarist. The production sounds a little too big, that's contradictory - because they said this album is suppose to be back to their rock and roll roots. I must say that it slightly disappoints me, but this is still a solid record. BUT, there are plenty of gas in the tank for U2, There will be more great music to come. Best songs: Miracle drug, city of blinding lights, crumbs from your table and original of the species… Expand
  95. LiamF
    Jun 29, 2005
    10
    brilliant come back to greates
  96. Garry
    Jun 29, 2005
    10
    people listen to COBL, Crumbs, ABOY brilliant thing deserve to be on of their best albums
  97. AlexandreC
    Jul 18, 2005
    9
    Simply the best U2 album in many years.
  98. EstuardoB
    Aug 13, 2005
    10
    If BOY had been released in 2005, it is hard to think it would have had any impact, same if HTDAAB had been released in 1983. This is the sound of a band who beyond making excellent albums, is intense on being relevant, on sending their material to the radiowaves and battling out with the fads, being them Heavy Metal, Alternative, Hip Hop, Pop. U2 has surfed thru all of these epochs, and If BOY had been released in 2005, it is hard to think it would have had any impact, same if HTDAAB had been released in 1983. This is the sound of a band who beyond making excellent albums, is intense on being relevant, on sending their material to the radiowaves and battling out with the fads, being them Heavy Metal, Alternative, Hip Hop, Pop. U2 has surfed thru all of these epochs, and this album is yet another amazing vehicle to soar above the rest of the general music out there.… Expand
  99. Matt
    Aug 27, 2005
    10
    Fantastic album from beginning to end. U2 just can't seem to go wrong... (if you pass a blind eye over "Pop") A fantastic live band such as them combined with these huge arena rocking anthems is just an amazing experience.
  100. ZackA
    Sep 26, 2005
    10
    This is one of those albums that, after repeated listening, reveals its intrecacies to the listener slowly. One realizes the complexly interwoven themes that tie the songs together and the overarching reach towards the answer to the question posed in the title: Love.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

92
#92 Best Album of 2004
4
#4 Most Discussed Album of 2004
25
#25 Most Shared Album of 2004

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 26 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 26
  3. Negative: 0 out of 26
  1. Village Voice
    50
    This time, Steve Lillywhite and the other producers assembled simply construct a U2 album in miniature, mixing in the Edge's processed-guitar trademark whenever you fear they're straying into unforgivable un-U2ness. That's just not enough.
    Read full review
  2. Rolling Stone
    80
    This is grandiose music from grandiose men, sweatlessly confident in the execution of their duties.
    Read full review
  3. Delusions of Adequacy
    70
    While the rest of the album fails to live up to the breadth of “City” and “Crumbs,” and while it takes serious missteps on the shockingly bad “Man and a Woman” and “Yahweh,” this is, by and large, an album to be thankful for, regardless of your demographic.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »