User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 918 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 819 out of 918
-
Mixed: 71 out of 918
-
Negative: 28 out of 918
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Aug 16, 2013Arcade Fire, trying to outshine Funeral, have created a melodramatic, overdone work. It has some good songs but just doesn't have the heart of Funeral.
-
Jan 21, 2013I consider myself an Arcade Fire fan but Neon Bible just lacks the amount of variety present on Funeral and The Suburbs. Neon Bible does have impressive orchestration especially in the new rendition of No Cars Go. But overall this album is lacking in songs that pop out and lacks the amazing variety that their other two albums have.
-
KlausVMay 27, 2008The intro Black Mirror and title track are the only bright spots on this album, the rest is forgettable blackness.
-
-
StevioApr 28, 2008Completely over-rated. Some original sounds but clumsy adolescent lyrics which are embarrassing to listen to.
-
-
RichK.Apr 11, 2008The album, I felt was so overrated. There are so many other albums that exceeded to be considered as the best album of the year.
-
-
BobBobFeb 24, 2008I don't get this albums high praise. The song Neon Bible just seems slow and unmoving. I like the no Cars Go song, but what else. For new stuff this year give me Of Montreal or LCD.
-
-
JimHDec 28, 2007Disappointingly mundane follow-up that makes me think that I overestimated its predecessor. This has some good songs toward the end but this seems like a band that's already losing momentum.
-
-
DavidF.Dec 5, 2007If this record came out before Funeral people would not have thought nearly as highly of it. For me, it lacks the energy it's predecessor has. The album is okay, but nothing special.
-
-
RJM.Nov 10, 2007stupid stupid stupid. vacuous social commentary. even worse production. funeral had a few good moments; this has fewer.
-
-
BrianD.Nov 7, 2007Take 3 steps forward. Then take 6 steps backwards and drop a deuce where you stand. That's what Arcade Fire did in releasing this album as the follow up to Funeral.
-
-
anonymousyOct 22, 2007Not bad but not that great.
-
-
danwOct 1, 2007
-
-
SteveO.Sep 25, 2007I feel like I'm not in the cool club here. I bought this hoping for something earth shattering and found it only average - in fact from the first song I didn't like it. The comparison is less Talking Heads art rock and more Black 47 via Springsteen, but without the heart to back up the social commentary.
-
-
HollisG.Aug 16, 2007Good album, but I feel like Arcade Fire expanded on and explored all the things about them that I didn't really dig, rather than move in a more daring, explosive direction. I wanted to love this album, I really did. But I suppose the final test is that I really just don't listen to it that much.
-
-
J.B.Jul 24, 2007Solid descibes it best; over-hyped - yes; boring - no
-
-
JayKJul 20, 2007
-
-
JordanKJun 13, 2007
-
-
AndrewC.Jun 5, 2007This album is overrated. It's better than Funeral, but it's not that special. I particularly enjoy two tracks off the album - "Where no cars go" which is a rip off of Prefab Sprout's King Of Rock n' Roll, and Antichrist Television Blues, which is a great tribute to Bruce Springsteen.
-
-
MikeAMay 29, 2007I just don't understand the hype over this band. This disc, like their debut is interesting, but not deserving of the accolades it seems to be getting.
-
-
tboneApr 29, 2007Ugg. So many bad things to say. Like Destroyer and New Pornographers, you gotta either love em or hate em. I don't buy the schtick. barely veiled ripoffs of better artists. Too many gimicks. Overly bombastic. Pam Anderson remains the best thing to come out of Canada by alot.
-
-
hoonerApr 25, 2007Sounds like it was recorded in a shed! NOT the best band of all time, I wish you people would get some perspective and stop herelding evry new band the best ever.
-
-
wolfbagApr 2, 2007Am I allowed to say this? Well...here goes...I thnik this is a pretty weak album compared to Funeral. It sounds like Arcade Fire doing Arcade Fire covers, i.e. a bit formulaic and overly dramatic, plus there's a lot of cringeworthy lyrics. The only surprising bit is the Springsteen impression, but if I wanted that I would have bought one of his own albums. There, I said it.
-
-
Erics.Mar 31, 2007Overrated.
-
-
TrentNMar 28, 2007Its a good album but i dont belive the band well ever put out anything as good a Funeral. The prduction on this album is really poor compared to the last one.
-
-
JosephAMar 26, 2007This is a really good album, but the production is piss poor. Everything is covered by everything else leaving little room for any of the instrumentation to shine. The lyrics are great and the arrangements and songwriting as well. But unfortunately, its all very cramped and mono for such colorful instrumentation. A shame really.
-
-
danaMar 23, 2007
-
-
JayPMar 23, 2007
-
-
EvanSMar 17, 2007A huge fan of Funeral, I just don't get this album. The band pulls the same rally cry intended to put you on your feet but left me scratching my head. Why must every song on this album end sound like a potential theme song for the Olympics? Pure cheese. They can do better.
-
-
ScottWMar 16, 2007
-
-
LSMar 15, 2007Not great, not bad
-
Awards & Rankings
-
So, Funeral was by no means a fluke. The Arcade Fire are unquestionably the real deal. And to prove it they’ve now thrown in another contender for ‘best record of the decade’.
-
The Canadian septet are the greatest art rock group since Talking Heads stopped making sense.
-
Alternative PressWhile devotees of Funeral... will surely enjoy Neon Bible, the album does have a decidedly different feel than its predecessor--mainly, there seems to be less of an emphasis on choruses. [Apr 2007, p.182]