User Score
8.8

Universal acclaim- based on 64 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 58 out of 64
  2. Negative: 3 out of 64

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. michaelf
    May 11, 2007
    0
    Who is making the money off this album? I really still don't understand the whole dead people releasing new albums phenomenon...
  2. JorgeR
    May 23, 2007
    0
    Elliot se merece un 10 en toda su carrera pero este cd es simplemente elproducto de las ambiciones de dinero de kalgunos productores carroñeros
  3. RajuK.
    Jan 17, 2008
    2
    If he didn't sing, the CD would have been much better. He can play the guitar, and write some lyrics, but thats where his talent stops. I don't feel like listening to someone who cant sing in a genre of music where I think you need to showcase your vocals when it is almost acapella in nature. He is out of tune every other line. Sorry, not for me.
Metascore
85

Universal acclaim - based on 30 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 27 out of 30
  2. Negative: 0 out of 30
  1. Under The Radar
    80
    As hope, there are revealing looks at Smith's developments as a writer. [#17, p.87]
  2. 80
    New Moon sounds less like a pile of outtakes than an official album released in a parallel universe.
  3. Smith's trademark combination of breathy - almost whispered - vocals, deceptively resilient acoustic melodies, and sombrely introspective lyrics, is shown off to sufficiently good advantage here to make New Moon a worthy companion piece to 1995's Elliott Smith and 1997's Either/Or.