User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 41 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 41
-
Mixed: 3 out of 41
-
Negative: 23 out of 41
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
AziziO.May 25, 2009He tried his best, unfortunately this album makes him more of a pop artist than hip hop.
-
-
AjayDApr 4, 2009
-
-
HexSApr 22, 2009This album is great if you are 11 years old!
-
-
FaglovingDApr 3, 2009Awful, just awful.
-
-
AlexH.May 12, 2009I'm sorry a 63, this has to be one of the worst albums I've heard in a very long time. Flo Rida has taken advantage of one, good hit single, other than that, his "music" is utter crap.
-
-
Sep 10, 2015A 62? Are you kidding me? This album gets a bigger score than Eminem's Relapse? Give me a break.
-
May 10, 2016i remember when this album first came out. not many songs caught my ear. seems the guests do better than the main guys album. the fact this album is the score it is from critics is surprising. thought they were gonna diss this one out. very poor album. seems more pop than hip hop
-
The unsurprisingly inconsistent R.O.O.T.S. is hip-hop like Nas never happened, a flash or fodder album owing more to Lady GaGa than to Public Enemy.
-
The problem is that he shows no growth--besides realizing, along with his producers, that if you throw every hook known to man into the pop ocean, you are bound to catch something.
-
Flo Rida boasts an adroit double-timed flow, but his greatest achievement is his understanding of how to stay in the background, never overwhelming the electro-laced tracks.