The Woods
by Sleater-Kinney
  • Record Label: Sub Pop
  • Release Date: May 24, 2005
User Score
8.4

Universal acclaim- based on 183 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 151 out of 183
  2. Mixed: 12 out of 183
  3. Negative: 20 out of 183

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. All_ButTrU4
    Apr 1, 2022
    8
    Sleater Kinney is the best thing to come out of the Olympia GRRL movement and since their seemingly fully formed debut they've been on a streak of remarkable albums that only stand to push the boundaries only they could leave for themselves . The woods is an epic testimony to skill with heavy guitars and caustic vibrating vocals it's sound creates a wall around you. It's truly a rivetingSleater Kinney is the best thing to come out of the Olympia GRRL movement and since their seemingly fully formed debut they've been on a streak of remarkable albums that only stand to push the boundaries only they could leave for themselves . The woods is an epic testimony to skill with heavy guitars and caustic vibrating vocals it's sound creates a wall around you. It's truly a riveting experience.… Expand
  2. nirvanafreak
    Jan 6, 2016
    10
    I think 11 years on I can say its a classic record. S-K progressed with each album until they reached perfection with this and No Cities To Love. Are they capable of making a less than perfect album anymore?
  3. Omniculex
    Jan 15, 2015
    10
    Their most brutal album, by far, and yet what a wonderful pain it is. They were always so razor sharp, but this time, they've decided to bludgeon and pulverize.
  4. SilverMan
    Jun 25, 2012
    9
    Finally a real energetic rock album. Its essence's been missing for so many years, now Sleater Kinney push it back with this extraordinary album. Rock from the begining until the end, I assure you
  5. KeithG
    Apr 25, 2012
    4
    There are some really great moments here. Sleater-Kinney show great cohesion and some really tight guitar work here at the end of their run. Still, I find the album too slow and too abrasive at points to truly enjoy. Download "Jumpers", "Entertain", and "Steep Air" but do not purchase the entire album.
  6. MarcDoyle
    Nov 13, 2010
    9
    Great album. It's got such a full sound, especially compared to many of other other acts in the riot girrrrl era. They've come a long way since Heavens to Betsy..
  7. MikeL
    Feb 16, 2008
    10
    Amazing. Still an absolutely amazing record.
  8. Gus
    Dec 12, 2007
    10
    Amazing.
  9. leons
    Apr 4, 2007
    10
    A couple of years on and I still cant stop listerning
  10. AndyP
    Aug 13, 2006
    10
    Great from beginning to end, even if the poor mastering gets annoying once in a while. Really captures the intensity of their live show. Sad to see them go, and glad I caught them at Lollapalooza first.
  11. time
    Aug 9, 2006
    10
    What a fond farewell to the greatest band of the decade.
  12. hannahb
    Jul 9, 2006
    10
    incredible album from the greatest girl group ever. a move away from punk, but still outrageous and as intense as always. i saw them live (thank god, as they've since disbanded) and they were unbelieveable.
  13. NickT
    Jan 20, 2006
    10
    Sleater-Kinney, after 7 amazing albums, is still one of the most genuine bands working today. With "The Woods" they instill a sense of growth within long-time listeners. Corin's vocals alone are worth mountains of praise, but the amount of depth in this album and the growth from "One Beat" is inspiring. The girls just make their job look so easy.
  14. sidewinder572
    Jan 17, 2006
    10
    This is everything that a rock record should be and everything that's lacking in todays rock music.
  15. SeamusS
    Jan 6, 2006
    10
    . An album that
  16. SeanT
    Dec 11, 2005
    10
    this album gave me goosebumps. sleater-kinney going hard = kick ass
  17. JamesM
    Dec 9, 2005
    10
    Just ace
  18. RonE
    Dec 1, 2005
    10
    You'll hate me for saying it, but this is an instant classic. It is superb. It's a daring album, a risk taken by the band that paid back in spades, which reward is then passed on to the listener. The initial blast of "The Fox" sets the tone; "Jumpers" might be the most beautiful song about suicide; "Rollercoaster" never fails to make me want to dance; and wrapping up the You'll hate me for saying it, but this is an instant classic. It is superb. It's a daring album, a risk taken by the band that paid back in spades, which reward is then passed on to the listener. The initial blast of "The Fox" sets the tone; "Jumpers" might be the most beautiful song about suicide; "Rollercoaster" never fails to make me want to dance; and wrapping up the sprawling effort of "Let's Call it Love" is the haunting and beatiful "Night Light".… Expand
  19. Gazcomsat
    Nov 22, 2005
    4
    As a fan of Sleater Kinney, I have to say I just don't get this album nor for that matter the majority of the reviews on this site. The songs are certainly heavier than previous offerings but mainly because they are so incredibly distorted. Take "Modern Girl" as an example. Everything starts out fine, melodic, nice vocals then you hit 2 minutes into the song and all hell breaks As a fan of Sleater Kinney, I have to say I just don't get this album nor for that matter the majority of the reviews on this site. The songs are certainly heavier than previous offerings but mainly because they are so incredibly distorted. Take "Modern Girl" as an example. Everything starts out fine, melodic, nice vocals then you hit 2 minutes into the song and all hell breaks loose. Nothing actually changes much as far as the band themselves are concerned but someone in their infinite wisdom thought it might add something to the track by pushing the distortion levels to the max rendering it virtually unlistenable. Why? What was the point? Nothing good was added to the song but it certainly makes for uncomfortable listening. Sleater Kinney aren't Led Zepelin nor do I want them to be. Corrin Tuckers voice is unusual enough to keep Sleater Kinney one step ahead of the pack without having to resort to this type of "experimentation". I don't see how the band could have actually listened to the album prior to it actually being pressed and think that it was ok. For me, this isn't going to be "a grower" because frankly, it's just plain bad. Unbelievably disappointing.… Expand
  20. RStJ
    Nov 15, 2005
    5
    Ok, first of, you people giving this mess a "10" need to wake up. This album has major problems, not least of hich is the almost unlistenable mi/mastering. I'm t a total loss to explain this as nything other than some catostrophe occurring in the studio which had to be covered by superheating the mix to the point where you focus on the distortion rather than the frequently inept song Ok, first of, you people giving this mess a "10" need to wake up. This album has major problems, not least of hich is the almost unlistenable mi/mastering. I'm t a total loss to explain this as nything other than some catostrophe occurring in the studio which had to be covered by superheating the mix to the point where you focus on the distortion rather than the frequently inept song takes. Next, you people giving this a "0" need to snap out of it too, since very few bands will ever be able to record a song as terrifyingly good as Jumpers. I'm pretty sure this is what the entire album was supposed to sound like as Jumpers is tight, well-rehearsed, and clearly a finished product unlike over half of the other songs. It also sounds much like SK's best work in the past, just updated a bit with a strong sense of rock c. 1991. Sadly, the vibe reminds me very much of late period Nirvana and we all know how that ended up. The cancellation of the November tour dates is an ominous sign. I hope Brownstein is OK. If she's the first person "I" of Jumpers then she might not be. The song really should have been called "Jumper" (singular) since there is only one person in the song and it is not a meditation on why people jump in general, but why one person in particular jumps--a profound and hopeless sense of loneliness. On the strength of this one song, I give the record a "5." I hope it's not the end for the band, but I think it probably will be.… Expand
  21. mikem
    Nov 14, 2005
    10
    best rock band in america, hands down. lyrically not some of their best work, but the heaving raw guitars and power define what rock music should be. this is not an album for everyone, so for those who prefer slickly produced and filtered music, highly refined and synthetic sounds, cerebral melodies and gentle measured beats, this album may not be for you. for any fan of real visceral best rock band in america, hands down. lyrically not some of their best work, but the heaving raw guitars and power define what rock music should be. this is not an album for everyone, so for those who prefer slickly produced and filtered music, highly refined and synthetic sounds, cerebral melodies and gentle measured beats, this album may not be for you. for any fan of real visceral american rock music, our nation's sole remaining export in these post-industrial times, SK's The Woods is the real thing.… Expand
  22. M.Mignatti.
    Nov 10, 2005
    10
    Incredible.
  23. StevenL
    Nov 9, 2005
    1
    "Leeeeetttttt It gooooooooooooo." Someone please put Corin out of her misery and mine.
  24. JohnD.
    Oct 26, 2005
    1
    To those who say you must have a sophistocated ear to 'get' all that's going on in this music, I say give me a break. Sufjan Stevens, John Coltrane, Brian Wilson, Thelonious Monk, Wilco, Radiohead, Sigur Ros, etc. are all bands and muscians that are greatly appreciated by those with a deeper understanding of musical content and are willing to hear daring and inovative To those who say you must have a sophistocated ear to 'get' all that's going on in this music, I say give me a break. Sufjan Stevens, John Coltrane, Brian Wilson, Thelonious Monk, Wilco, Radiohead, Sigur Ros, etc. are all bands and muscians that are greatly appreciated by those with a deeper understanding of musical content and are willing to hear daring and inovative artists at work. One must also enter passion into the equation with any music to truly 'get it.' Passion for what's being said both lyrically and musically. To my ear, Sleater-Kinney is neither daring nor innovative on this deeply disappointing album. It is true that they are passionate about what they have created here (as are their numerous fans and the reviewers who have given this record positive reviews) but passion doesn't always make good music. Here are just a few things that bother me about this album: a lead singer who often tries to sing with a Bristish accent and is full of snarl and vigor but offers little in the way of true vocal talent; pointless, often childlike lyrics that say nothing new or orignal; feedback for the sake of feedback with no real purpose other than to say "this is our down and dirty album and screw you if you don't like it; Guitar solos that end up nowhere; a horribly mixed album where everything is thrown together and tossed and the result is what it is. It's true that in the world of rock and roll (alternative, punk, heavy metal, hard rock, indie) attitude counts for a lot and helps greatly to get your message accross, but what happens when that message is incoherent or at best muddled? The result is The Woods… Expand
  25. IanC
    Oct 15, 2005
    10
    I had heard of Sleater-Kinney but never actually "heard" them before seeing how highly regarded this album was on metacritic. I picked up this album, and all I have to say is that it is a crime against humanity that they are not more well known. Just attended their concert in Omaha last Wednesday and there were all of maybe 300 people there to see what I now consider to be the best rock I had heard of Sleater-Kinney but never actually "heard" them before seeing how highly regarded this album was on metacritic. I picked up this album, and all I have to say is that it is a crime against humanity that they are not more well known. Just attended their concert in Omaha last Wednesday and there were all of maybe 300 people there to see what I now consider to be the best rock band in the world. If you like hard, uncompromising music, pick up this album.… Expand
  26. Sams
    Sep 26, 2005
    1
    Horribly Overrated.
  27. JamesF
    Sep 14, 2005
    10
    This one is special. It sounds like a classic. Check it out, say you knew about it when.
  28. Ellen
    Sep 7, 2005
    10
    Surely, Sleater-Kinney are not a band that can be digested easily. Most of the negative reviews you will read on this page will probably come from two groups of people: those who have never heard an S-K album and just happened to pick up The Woods, listened to it once or twice, and thought it was horrendous, and then old-school S-K fans who favor the complex in-and-out weaving guitar Surely, Sleater-Kinney are not a band that can be digested easily. Most of the negative reviews you will read on this page will probably come from two groups of people: those who have never heard an S-K album and just happened to pick up The Woods, listened to it once or twice, and thought it was horrendous, and then old-school S-K fans who favor the complex in-and-out weaving guitar riffs and off kilter melodies of their older albums. The point is, don't listen to either. There is so much to fathom in The Woods that it is bound to turn off first time listeners or those who are too stuck in their perception of what the band should sound like. I would not recommend this CD to anyone who had never heard S-K, because for this CD to be your first introduction to them would be too much to handle. With all that said though, what an incredible album it is! The instrumentals are unmatched by most current bands in rock, and the songwriting only further displays the band's talent. It's been ten years running and the women of S-K have NEVER sounded better. And as to all the complaints about the production, it flows perfectly, 100% with each song. The distortion perfectly lends to the overall tone of the music.… Expand
  29. KeithR
    Sep 4, 2005
    0
    I can not believe that a worse album could get better reviews. Totally unlistenable!! Grating screehing for vocals. Horrible, unintelligent lyrics. Distortion used to cover up talentless noodling. It becomes laughable quite quickly. For the life of me, I can't understand how anyone could enjoy this crap.
  30. BrianB
    Sep 3, 2005
    1
    Perhaps this album could have been good, but the production is so horrible that you can barely listen to it. There is a term in mastering music called brickwalling, when the volume dynamic (the amount of volume variation) is reduced to nearly nothing. This is not the same as putting the guitar amps at 11. It's like they took the sound and squished all the soul out of it. Don't Perhaps this album could have been good, but the production is so horrible that you can barely listen to it. There is a term in mastering music called brickwalling, when the volume dynamic (the amount of volume variation) is reduced to nearly nothing. This is not the same as putting the guitar amps at 11. It's like they took the sound and squished all the soul out of it. Don't get me wrong: I like abrasive music. But this is literally the opposite of the Steve Albini/PJ Harvey Rid of Me sound, because all the life has been sucked out of the music in order to get it "loud." It's just bad mastering, plain and simple, and it made my stereo sound broken -- and not broken in a good way. I only listened to it once, and I may try to listen to it again... but I was so so so disappointed by this album. The singing was great, and the playing was tight, but I couldn't grasp any melodic feel to it. The first song is the best example: it starts out using lots of bended strings in different fret positions, and the result is that the "riff" never feels like it settles down in any key. Then, with the vocals on top of this riff made up of entirely bended strings, it feels melodically disorganized. Maybe it gets better with repeated listens, and maybe over time I will appreciate all these weird melodies. This is the worst mastering I've ever heard on an album. Are all these critics just praising the naked emperor, or am I just less able to instantly hear greatness? I generally agree with most critics, but this time, I have to disagree. I'm so disappointed. I was planning on loving this album and driving around with it blaring. *sigh*… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

6
#6 Best Album of 2005
24
#24 Most Discussed Album of 2005
64
#64 Most Shared Album of 2005

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
88

Universal acclaim - based on 35 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 32 out of 35
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 35
  3. Negative: 0 out of 35
  1. Village Voice
    90
    Previous albums have never quite captured those onstage moments when the power they generate seems to catch them unawares, but on The Woods you can hear not only the deliberation in Weiss's eyes as she ponders the exact placement of beat and crash, or Brownstein's bedroom-mirror rock-star poses, but also the stunned grin Tucker can never contain after emitting her most gravity-defiant shrieks.
    Read full review
  2. Alternative Press
    100
    [They] clearly sound alive with the possibility of redefining punk song structure by writing 11-minute flamboyant guitar dirges that have as much in common with My Bloody Valentine as they do with '70s arena rock. [May 2005, p.170]
  3. Amazon.com
    80
    A smoldering rock and roll record that rivals John Lennon’s Plastic Ono Band and Nirvana’s In Utero in terms of unexpectedness.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »