The Observer (UK)'s Scores
- Movies
- Music
For 2,620 reviews, this publication has graded:
-
37% higher than the average critic
-
4% same as the average critic
-
59% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Average Music review score: 68
Highest review score: | Gold-Diggers Sound | |
---|---|---|
Lowest review score: | Collections |
Score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,233 out of 2620
-
Mixed: 1,369 out of 2620
-
Negative: 18 out of 2620
2620
music
reviews
- By Date
- By Critic Score
-
- Critic Score
Walker is much more interested in how the beauty of his voice can serve declamation and confrontation; but you sometimes recoil from this mannered anti-croon.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Dec 3, 2012
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
With the exception of Romeo, inspired by Greek mythology and possessing an irresistible chorus, too much of the album’s hinterland sounds slick but uninspired.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jan 25, 2016
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Mar 11, 2013
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Good Sad Happy Bad--born out of a heavily edited jam session--feels more shapeless and, as a result, more frustrating.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Oct 5, 2015
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Too much of this music is just hip, well-connected (you can Google their amorous partners, current and former) aural wallpaper, gossamer and murky by turns, undoubtedly very pleasant in an altered state but frustratingly unmemorable.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jan 21, 2014
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted May 20, 2019
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted May 22, 2017
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Full marks for devotion to "authenticity", but, sadly, authentic doesn't necessarily mean interesting.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Oct 24, 2011
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
It's not dissimilar to Jean Michel Jarre's Oxygene stripped of its most memorable passages, and might well do what it suggests on the cover. But those hypnotic washes of sound go beyond their remit and could have us all dozing off.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted May 19, 2014
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Listen still delivers the familiar crowd-pleasing builds and drops, the formulaic song structures.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Nov 24, 2014
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The music--lots of nondescript ballads, a splash of contemporary disco--is no less banal [as headlines from the Daily Mail].- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Nov 30, 2012
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
There is little drama here, just plenty of shorthand (sad pianos), a total absence of risk and, perhaps worst of all, no evidence of the deranged hedonism that catapulted Smith into a funk.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Nov 6, 2017
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Fifteen tracks stretches them too far, though, and on the likes of Fog, their woahs sound tired, and it becomes apparent that these are pretty empty musical calories.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Aug 12, 2019
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Nov 20, 2017
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Sep 24, 2012
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
At its least appealing, the music follows suit, dealing in boilerplate pop of varying hues: ponderous-verse-into-epic-chorus balladry; sugary indie guitars on 305 and Teach Me How to Love, dance pop so unmemorable it’s a wonder Mendes didn’t forget he was singing it and wander off midway through. But, just occasionally, something from outside the standard palette of current pop grabs your attention.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Dec 3, 2020
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Feb 20, 2018
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
It's filled with meat-and-potatoes beats, which, despite their dangerous titles (Machine Gun, Wickedest Man) are more likely to make you check your watch than lose your head.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Oct 7, 2013
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
He [Biggie] was never boring, unlike this compilation of tired productions and mawkish interludes.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted May 22, 2017
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
On this sequel, Gibbs mostly sounds bored, aggressively bored or boringly aggressive. The ever creative Madlib chucks in everything he can find to dazzle the listener. When this coheres--in the vicious swamp-beat of Massage Seats, for example--it’s sensational. Often his work sounds too dense to compete with mass-market trap, and struggles to support Gibbs’s gruff rhymes.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jul 1, 2019
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
For all the mash-ups, Bangerz feels stitched together in the dark, and the attention-seeking begins to grate.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Oct 4, 2013
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Producer Ed Harcourt has met her mannered delivery and plummy English vowels with string-soaked arrangements but they're more saccharine than stirring.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jan 21, 2014
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
All most of the candle-held-to-the-sun versions here reveal--from the hushed, sad, fingerpicky take on Blank Space to the hushed, sad, strummy take on Out of the Woods--is a strong urge to listen to Swift herself.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Sep 28, 2015
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Mar 11, 2019
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Too much of the material sounds formulaic, most noticeably a Strokes pastiche, Darkness in Our Hearts, and the Verve-by-numbers Out of Control.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jun 3, 2013
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
The usually redoubtable Beth Ditto sounds less like the spirit of riot grrrl and more like a wannabe material girl.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted May 14, 2012
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
Other than the sultry Stars Dance, much of this sounds like songs Rihanna rejected.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jul 22, 2013
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Oct 13, 2014
- Read full review
-
- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Jun 18, 2012
- Read full review
-
- Critic Score
It’s a boldly idiosyncratic collection, and generous in its aims, but it’s also an unsatisfyingly structured racket.- The Observer (UK)
- Posted Nov 11, 2019
- Read full review