User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 590 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 544 out of 590
-
Mixed: 25 out of 590
-
Negative: 21 out of 590
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
FrankSep 20, 2002really bland stuff and so damn middle of the road. The amount of acclaim this record is getting shows how boring music critics are. At least Travis had the decency to do a humorous video clip.
-
-
SusanBSep 13, 2005Mediocre at best, dull and lifeless at worst. The occasional good track, i.e. The Scientist, is cancelled out by the overwhelming blandness of the album as a whole. Uninventive, unemotional and overated
-
-
ErwinK.Sep 30, 2002Yes. Music for bedwetters.
-
-
JazzyNov 12, 2002
-
-
musicLoverOct 17, 2002Bought the album - Can I get a refund ???
-
-
BkJan 3, 2005over rated!
-
-
MelissaSep 4, 2002100% facade.
-
-
OsaADec 9, 2006
-
-
ShawnTFeb 27, 2003worst band and album ever. The songs are sooooo boring!!!!!!!!!
-
-
Jan 19, 2011
Awards & Rankings
-
Without the emotional resonance of Martin's voice at its most free, Coldplay's brilliantly minimal musical foundation has nothing to support. So it falters.
-
Coldplay's new record is a little edgier, trancier, and more conversational than their last. It is called A Rush of Blood to the Head, and in waves and swells of major tunes and frisky then looping time signatures, that's just about the effect it has.
-
But while the sound of this album is more expansive, the influences a bit less obvious, and the approach more varied, the guys forgot to tote along their initial strength: the songs.