• Record Label: Maverick
  • Release Date: Sep 14, 2004
User Score
7.2

Generally favorable reviews- based on 68 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 48 out of 68
  2. Negative: 7 out of 68

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. robl
    Jan 17, 2005
    3
    first two tracks are good - after that it tails off into confused mediocrity. Christ, the chemical brothers did the oasis/dance crossover ides ages ago. I wonder what all the discarded stuff sounded like - sorry but baby's got a temper was better than most of this!
  2. ScientiztD
    May 11, 2005
    1
    This is the worst Prodigy album ever, i am a hardcore prodigy fan from the first beginning and not commercially minded. This is only a collection of samples glued together like i heard one of the local wizzkids could do better, only spitfire had a bit of edge, the rest is crappy. It just lackes the typical prodigy attitude. It scares me, whats going on?
  3. MacM
    Oct 2, 2004
    2
    This is nothing short of a woeful Hardknox tribute. Girls is one of the best singles of the year but the rest of this is embarrassingly bad.
  4. diablom
    Sep 28, 2004
    1
    Garbage. Half-baked and half-arsed.
  5. Rico
    Sep 14, 2004
    3
    This is an outdated mess. It's The Prodigy in name only. The spirit is gone. Ignore this and instead revisit the first 3 albums.
  6. philippel
    Sep 16, 2004
    0
    This is simply 7 years too late. Awful.
Metascore
53

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 23
  2. Negative: 4 out of 23
  1. Los Angeles Times
    50
    It's like a series of beats in search of a firestarter. [3 Oct 2004]
  2. If electroclash left you cold... then this is, idealistically, how it should have sounded.
  3. Q Magazine
    40
    After all these years, is that it? [Sep 2004, p.110]