User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 154 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 136 out of 154
-
Mixed: 9 out of 154
-
Negative: 9 out of 154
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Oct 25, 2010Half of the cuts are interesting and the other half are just bad versions of the interesting ones. Listening to this from start to finish is a real chore and, basically, it's just too draining for it to ever be an enjoyable record.
-
Jan 3, 2011
-
JohnGDec 4, 2002
-
-
JonHJun 7, 2004Shockingly bland
-
-
JasonK.Oct 22, 2005
-
-
ZachL.May 29, 2005The start seemed to have some goodness to it (besides the lyrics), but about half way through I was tired of it. This album has the same problem that about 90% of modern rock (by modern rock I mean media-hyped rock) suffers from, and that is monotony.
-
-
Feb 3, 2020This is a weird album with a ton of talent attached. Chris Cornell is of course amazing as a singer yet he is clearly not experimenting as much as he did with Soundgarden.
-
Apr 18, 2016
Awards & Rankings
-
BlenderThis is feel-good stuff, the sound of a rejuvenating artistic vacation. [#12, p.136]
-
A curious idea from its inception, pairing Soundgarden's singer with Rage's musicians promises a unique alchemy it can't entirely deliver, obscuring the latter's politics and distinct sound.
-
The result isn't a faux Rage album; rather, it's the true follow-up to Soundgarden's ''Superunknown'' that neither that band nor a solo Cornell ever managed.