User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 708 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 588 out of 708
-
Mixed: 34 out of 708
-
Negative: 86 out of 708
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
TomKJan 9, 20043 words "Don't buy it"
-
-
KellySJan 9, 2004She is nothing but a sick slut!!!!
-
-
MatGJan 9, 2004She needs to give it up for all our sakes.
-
-
ssJun 1, 2004Madonna's better at this.
-
-
MelissaOSep 24, 2005she 's A rip-off aritst
-
-
JohnnyBNov 17, 2003Oh my goodness, this album is pure crap. It's as if Ms. Spears keeps getting worse and worse. She needs to step it up I mean she's filthy rich, take some vocal lessons or learn to play an instrument. Please do something cause this same shit is getting old.
-
-
KenCNov 18, 2003Pure ass.
-
-
EthanHNov 19, 2003I loved her three previous albums, but this is one of the worst cd's I have ever heard. This album doesn't even deserve a zero rating, more like a -2.
-
-
SarahTNov 25, 2003she ruins songs with her stupid childish voice and all that moaning. she needs to get over that and grow up.
-
-
BreannaRDec 11, 2003
-
-
MattDNov 18, 2003piece of trash.
-
-
Jun 28, 2012
-
Nov 27, 2013Disgusting!! Crude awful and gross. Britney and One More, were flirty and fun, this is just dead and off-putting
Not even any really nice melodies. Like some idiots playing with a computer program with a bunch cheap effects.
The best song is hold it against me, were a fine chorus barely survives an onslaught of special effects.
Dead, gross, dumb.
Awards & Rankings
-
Quite the most lifeless and unloved record to be released by an artist of Spears' global stature.
-
SpinA hectic sonic pileup. [Dec 2003, p.130]
-
Unlike previous Britney albums, In the Zone has no filler and no shoddy cover versions, just 57 varieties of blue-chip hit-factory pop.