Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 20 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 20
  2. Negative: 0 out of 20
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Apr 15, 2019
    60
    In choosing lower-key collaborators, however, Rowlands and Simons seem to want these more-banging-than-average tunes to speak for themselves.
  2. Apr 11, 2019
    50
    The album’s feel and sound is resiliently explosive, especially on the three-song mini mega-mix of sorts that kicks things off. ... The rest of the album feels a little more perfunctory, never quite being of a piece a la their euphoric 2010 return-to-form Further, or offering uniquely memorable high-points a la Born in the Echoes’ “Tomorrow Never Knows”-tinged face-melter “I’ll See You There.”
User Score
8.1

Universal acclaim- based on 56 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 46 out of 56
  2. Negative: 2 out of 56
  1. Apr 12, 2019
    9
    The Chemical Brothers sound more confident and focused than they have in 20 years. The veteran duo are running laps around theirThe Chemical Brothers sound more confident and focused than they have in 20 years. The veteran duo are running laps around their contemporaries and having fun doing it. No Geography is an absolute joy that doesn't seem to falter during its 46 minutes. Aggressive beats, genre-bending tracks, and perfectly matched collaborations. Everything you have come to expect from an exceptional Chemical Brothers record is present here. 9/10 Full Review »
  2. Apr 12, 2019
    8
    If you're reading reviews from Rolling Stone and taking them seriously, you should stop. No Geography is a great new album from the legendaryIf you're reading reviews from Rolling Stone and taking them seriously, you should stop. No Geography is a great new album from the legendary duo, filled with lots of elements that made the Chems so great to begin with. Headphones or speakers, make sure to check this one out. Turn it up, have fun. Full Review »
  3. Apr 16, 2019
    9
    Should we even consider Rolling Stone's opinion any more? Their rating makes no sense based on the text of their article, it seems likeShould we even consider Rolling Stone's opinion any more? Their rating makes no sense based on the text of their article, it seems like they've had a few and are just slinging out text to meet quotas. There's no passion in it. Oh the album's great btw, just thought I'd throw my 2 cents in on one of the mighty relevant critics. Full Review »