Oceania
by The Smashing Pumpkins
  • Record Label: EMI
  • Release Date: Jun 19, 2012
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 118 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 102 out of 118
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 118
  3. Negative: 9 out of 118
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. munkyforce
    Jul 1, 2012
    3
    I found this album had two major draw-backs. First is a very lack lustre vocal performance by Corgan, and second is a lack of dynamics within and between songs. In terms of the vocals there a few problems which all stem from a total lack of range. Corgan's vocals on this album lack range in pitch, length and tone. Say what you will about his voice, but Billy has shown us in the past thatI found this album had two major draw-backs. First is a very lack lustre vocal performance by Corgan, and second is a lack of dynamics within and between songs. In terms of the vocals there a few problems which all stem from a total lack of range. Corgan's vocals on this album lack range in pitch, length and tone. Say what you will about his voice, but Billy has shown us in the past that he has a good vocal range from subdued falsetto, to angry screams and soaring sustained notes. But in this album there are no catchy vocal hooks, Corgan seems to sit in the same octave and never stray from it, and there is no impact emotional or otherwise that cuts through. It's all very banal.
    The song dynamics are also very disappointing. There's no real range in terms of tempo, meter or intensity between or within the songs in this album. It all has a very large focus on an over-produced guitar and effects driven sound with no particular stand out riffs or melodies that cut through to make any particular song stand out. The bottom line is this - The music in this album is samey and banal, nothing stands out. No song in particular is bad as such, but all together as an album it sounds like elevator music.    … Expand
  2. MajorTomTGC
    Jun 19, 2012
    0
    Finally a new Smashing Pumpkins album, I wonder which direction it will go this time. Before listening to this album, I decided I would read up on other's thoughts. This album has been harolded as a return to form, on par with their greatest work, Siamese Dream. However, SD, this is not. Later Pumpkins albums seem to be more dreamy then agressive, or somethings only the former. What madeFinally a new Smashing Pumpkins album, I wonder which direction it will go this time. Before listening to this album, I decided I would read up on other's thoughts. This album has been harolded as a return to form, on par with their greatest work, Siamese Dream. However, SD, this is not. Later Pumpkins albums seem to be more dreamy then agressive, or somethings only the former. What made the early albums so great was the mixture of angry ninties grundge and gloomy phycodelics. Without the heaviness however, the Pumpkins lack substance. All in all, fans will probably listen, if only a couple times. Non-fans will have a hard time connecting the this work.… Expand
  3. Henry75
    Jun 21, 2012
    0
    Amazing. not since Siamese Dream has a Billy Corgan album sound so intense. It is a beautiful, exciting, rocking album from a band that has, at best, released mediocre material over the last 19 years. So Good!
  4. geedup
    Jun 28, 2012
    2
    Was very excited to hear Billy was going to come back to Smashing Pumpkins and was excited to hear the album was finally coming. Didn't know what to expect as I know their sound from the 90's couldn't be recreated. But, listening to it, I thought it was rubbish. The melodies found in their previous sound as all but disappeared. Most songs I didn't even completely listen to and only reallyWas very excited to hear Billy was going to come back to Smashing Pumpkins and was excited to hear the album was finally coming. Didn't know what to expect as I know their sound from the 90's couldn't be recreated. But, listening to it, I thought it was rubbish. The melodies found in their previous sound as all but disappeared. Most songs I didn't even completely listen to and only really liked two or so. Very guitar oriented, which is OK but almost every track has the same, guitar-heavy sound. Was expecting a bit more I guess.… Expand
  5. greensea66
    Jul 17, 2012
    0
    It really pains me to say this. SP was THE definitive band of my youth. This album is hot garbage. It's no better than any of the other horrible albums that have come out by SP in the past 10 years (not to mention an absolutely dreadful solo album by Corgan). Sadly, I'm done with SP and will no longer hope for them to produce good music.

Awards & Rankings

36
#36 Most Discussed Album of 2012
75
#75 Most Shared Album of 2012

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
72

Generally favorable reviews - based on 32 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 22 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 10 out of 32
  3. Negative: 0 out of 32
  1. Absolute Punk (Staff reviews)
    Aug 29, 2012
    70
    Oceania lacks the emotional force that it needed to transcend what it is: a former rock star trying to sound vital again.
    Read full review
  2. Uncut
    Aug 2, 2012
    70
    The loss of drummer Jimmy Chamberlain smarts, but "Quasar" and the :The Celestials" recall the Pumpkins' '90s heyday with out coming over as retread. [Sep 2012, p.86]
  3. Austin Chronicle
    Jul 19, 2012
    78
    Forget that it's probably the middle part of some overblown epic song set and enjoy it for what it is: 13 songs that try to break new ground, and generally succeed, while managing to sound like the Pumpkins we know rather than plastic studio production.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »