Room On Fire

  • Record Label: RCA
  • Release Date: Oct 28, 2003
Metascore
77

Generally favorable reviews - based on 31 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 24 out of 31
  2. Negative: 1 out of 31
  1. This compressed feel, the precision of the band's playing and arrangements, and the way every song comes to an abrupt stop sometimes make the album sound too closed-off.
  2. Alternative Press
    90
    Better than its predecessor. [Dec 2003, p.150]
  3. Even the half-hearted retreads ("You Talk Way Too Much," "Between Love & Hate") cashing in on the notoriously unwashed NYC quintet's debut can't muster a wink.
  4. Blender
    60
    The fine distinction between cool and blase, aloof and distant, seems to have eluded them. [Nov 2003, p.106]
  5. Frankly, this is it all over again.
  6. An adrenaline-fueled head-rush of precision-perfect pop tunes about modern life.
  7. It’s a better album than Is This It, but then again, so were a dozen other rock records that year.
  8. Sounds like it was recorded in a tin can and constructed from leftovers off the group's debut.
  9. Entertainment Weekly
    75
    Anyone who invested anything in Is This It is destined to walk away from Room On Fire a little disappointed. [31 Oct 2003, p.71]
  10. Filter
    84
    It literally sounds like the Strokes, but it lacks heart. Which means it replicates the first album in form, but not substance. [#8, p.100]
  11. Room on Fire is a passionate, 32-minute burning effigy of the seemingly insurmountable expectations fans and critics had for the record.
  12. Magnet
    60
    There's something undeniably mechanical about Room On Fire. [#61, p.107]
  13. Mojo
    70
    The Strokes come across as a world-sized band that's tethering itself.... Nonetheless, this record is good. [Nov 2003, p.124]
  14. The Strokes don't make the most original sounding music you've ever heard, but they make something that is only The Strokes.
  15. ‘Room On Fire’ is a refining and tinkering with The Strokes sound, a carefully calibrated attempt not to fuck up too early in the face of untold temptations. The results are still sleek, sexy and thrilling, with a tantalising promise of even better to come.
  16. The central flaw of Room on Fire is the lack of hooks.
  17. The album is arguably better than the group's much-heralded debut, if by "better" we just mean more sonically impressive overall.
  18. That there's nothing new or innovative to be found here is sure to be a common complaint, though only those who prize evolution over knowing one's strengths will cry fraud.
  19. There's little of the pop sparkle that shone through the likes of 'The Modern Age' and 'Last Nite' even when - as with 'You Talk Way Too Much' - they're rewriting old material, and Julian's vocals are, to be blunt, awful, sounding uncomfortable to record and rather complacently nasal.
  20. There's so much more musical depth on Room on Fire, that it makes most of the band's earlier songs sound stale in comparison.
  21. Jun 6, 2013
    80
    [Casablancas] builds atmosphere out of evocative lyrics and emotional scenery, and he does it without leaning on linear narrative or songs with singular interpretations.
  22. Q Magazine
    100
    Pretty much everything a second album needs to be, it's like Is This It but more emotional, more colourful, slightly better. [Nov 2003, p.102]
  23. In the face of hysterical expectation, the Strokes have resisted the temptation to hit the brakes, grow up and screw around with a sound that doesn't need fixing -- yet.
  24. Room on Fire is the sound of a tighter, more focused band.
  25. Spin
    91
    Room's similarity to its predecessor ultimately bespeaks a purity of vision, not a dearth of new ideas. [Dec 2003, p.121]
  26. On Room On Fire, the band has the good sense to do what it does best and leave listeners wanting more.
  27. A roaring opener, a trio of great potential singles and a remarkable slow number successfully divert attention from the fact that half of Room on Fire is uninspired filler.
  28. There's nothing about the quintet's second album that audibly acknowledges the impact of its debut.
  29. Uncut
    80
    [Casablancas'] remarkable performance enlivens even the album's most underwhelming passages. [Nov 2003, p.108]
  30. Great, better even than the last.
User Score
8.7

Universal acclaim- based on 257 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 96 out of 115
  2. Negative: 10 out of 115
  1. Nov 5, 2010
    10
    7 years out and I'm going to write a review, just to bump this albums rating up. It's solid all the way through, Meet Me In The Bathroom is7 years out and I'm going to write a review, just to bump this albums rating up. It's solid all the way through, Meet Me In The Bathroom is the only weak song, but the other 10 are all perfect in my mind. Just let some of them grow on you and you'll have this album as one of your new favourites. Full Review »
  2. Dec 17, 2011
    9
    Full of great tracks this is a really excellent album that hasn't really received the credit it deserves. If you haven't listened to it for aFull of great tracks this is a really excellent album that hasn't really received the credit it deserves. If you haven't listened to it for a while give it another shot as there as some great tracks on it and very little filler. Full Review »
  3. OliverP
    Jun 3, 2005
    3
    The idea is not a bad one, but the same idea is repeated over and over. On 12:51, Julian Casablancas must be the only singer I have ever The idea is not a bad one, but the same idea is repeated over and over. On 12:51, Julian Casablancas must be the only singer I have ever heard who sounds just like another guitar. One of the most over-rated bands around. Full Review »