• Record Label: Atlantic
  • Release Date: Jan 29, 2008
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 34 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 34
  2. Negative: 13 out of 34

Review this album

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. KyleF
    Feb 13, 2008
    10
    Kyle Funks gay, white power.
  2. RoseS.
    Mar 7, 2008
    9
    I loved their first album, and I think "Slick Dogs and Ponies" is a fantastic album. I don't understand all the hate some of these people are spewing, but it's completely uncalled for. It's just good fun...people need to lighten up.
  3. PerroL.
    Feb 13, 2008
    10
    The album is great.
  4. Kiru
    Feb 22, 2008
    8
    What the hell is up with the rating? Seriously, this one doesn't deserve it.
  5. JimmyT.
    Feb 23, 2008
    10
    Best album of the 2000's
  6. AdamMacD.
    Mar 22, 2008
    10
    I cannot understand why more people aren't blown away by this record. It has revealed an evolution in the band, a prgression from sexy flirtatiousness to a lovely dirty, sexy cynicism that retains the flavour of the previous record, while taking a huge (but successful) gamble in a different direction. The strings arrangements are brilliant as well, and further demonstrate the chops I cannot understand why more people aren't blown away by this record. It has revealed an evolution in the band, a prgression from sexy flirtatiousness to a lovely dirty, sexy cynicism that retains the flavour of the previous record, while taking a huge (but successful) gamble in a different direction. The strings arrangements are brilliant as well, and further demonstrate the chops these fine young gentlemen possess, and as is brashly evident in their live performances. Expand
  7. JoeyBagofDonuts
    Mar 29, 2008
    10
    This is a great album.
  8. LennyF.
    Mar 6, 2008
    8
    I love this band. It's rock n roll. All sleaze and decadence. What do the critics not understand about that?
  9. MichaelM.
    Feb 14, 2008
    9
    while not as good as their first, this album still becomes great after a few listens. sometimes you just want to, what an awesome track.
  10. WarrenM
    Feb 19, 2008
    10
    This is much better than their first album - I can't understand all the poor reviews. It's consistently tuneful and exciting. I guess that's it's downfall for all those who prefer their "indie rock" to be a tuneless, pretentious, overlong mess....
  11. JasonT.
    Mar 27, 2008
    8
    I normally listen to hip-hop but I went to Chicago to see my cousin perform in his band (What Made Milwaukee Famous)...these guys sounded great live and I think it deserves at least a 6 or 7
  12. Aug 31, 2018
    10
    I found this cd in a bin in a goodwill and grabbed it because I though it looked kinda cool. Lo and behold, I found one of the best albums OF ALL TIME by sheer accident. How much other music is out there that no one knows about?
Metascore
37

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 10
  2. Negative: 4 out of 10
  1. The San Diego rockers haven’t completely reined in their runaway libidos on Slick Dogs and Ponies, but they stray from the devilish attitude that made their brazen dirty talk such a riot.
  2. The slightly more dynamic Louis XIV only give you testosterone-fueled rock at its least appealing extremes: heedless lust or, arguably even more repulsive, cheesy balladry.
  3. There's still too much of Brian Karscig's ultracampy 'Big Balls'--style vocals, and it sometimes feels like these guys have confused expanding their range with finding new sources to rip off.