- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
It’s hard to fault the album for a little flab when the band’s trying new things and mostly doing them well; hopefully they’ll realize that underproduction simply isn’t their style next time around.
-
Lopping off about twenty minutes would have improved things no end, but mostly it needs focus - focus that would probably have come with time.
-
FilterThere are just too many frickin' snoozers. [#24, p.89]
-
[Buyers oif the CD will] hear several solid-to-excellent songs that extend the rootsy trajectory of the Magic Numbers' fine first outing, making up in winsome intensity what they lack as far as edginess or sex appeal.
-
It might be easy to criticise 'Those The Brokes' as a stab at busting through into the MOR mainstream, but it's fairer to see it as The Magic Numbers developing their expression while staying faithful to their core sound, and quiet charm.
-
Q MagazineThose seeking more of the same will not be disappointed. [Dec 2006, p.128]
-
SpinThe real story of this breathtaking follow-up... is Romeo Stodart's transformation from merely a good songwritier to an outstanding one. [Feb 2007, p.85]
-
The group’s second album continues in the same vein as the generally winning debut--only now the arrangements are lusher and more ornate and, in a few unfortunate cases, the songs are longer.
-
It’s impressive how far this band can push its bright, modest sentimentality in 2007 without fetishizing it, making it hard and unpleasant.
-
UrbMagic Numbers have pushed their abilities while keeping their strong points on performance and substance. [Mar 2007, p.100]
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 9 out of 13
-
Mixed: 2 out of 13
-
Negative: 2 out of 13
-
Nov 12, 2015
-
JimMJun 13, 2007Trite and sadly lame. What was Romeo thinking when he thought the lyrics, "This is a song/and these are the words"X10 would help them sell records?
-
DanfromthebushNov 19, 2006