Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
May 26, 2022There’s lots to love but WE can’t match the power of the band’s first four records. Still, Arcade Fire’s returned rejuvenated after time in a cynical wilderness, ready to sing and dance against apathy. This album is worth it for that fact alone.
-
May 23, 2022If Everything Now’s readings of media-age malaise leant towards the grindingly obvious, WE is a partial improvement, give or take singer Win Butler’s occasional clunking takes on modern-life exhaustion.
-
May 9, 2022As a whole, WE is a fairly good album and would be better received if it wasn’t an Arcade Fire album.
-
May 5, 2022If We isn’t a return to the standards Arcade Fire reached on their debut album Funeral or 2010’s The Suburbs, it’s an improvement on its predecessor, and quite possibly enough to avert a slow slide down the festival bills.
-
May 3, 2022All of these gestures are deeply in earnest, and some of them even feel earned. But it’s hard not to hear We as the sound of a band hopefully setting things back in order, with better adventures to come.
-
May 11, 2022This may well be the group’s most sonically diverse outing yet, for good and for ill; even on the many occasions it isn’t convincing, it often manages enough novelty to entertain nonetheless, and Nigel Godrich's impeccable production job certainly makes the whole affair easy on the ears.
-
May 9, 2022Somehow, Arcade Fire have created an album that’s one half an exciting return to form and the other a continuation of their worst impulses.
-
May 5, 2022Despite its occasional moments of brilliance, “We” too often finds Arcade Fire stuck in a digital maze of its own design, ignoring the fact that it’s always sounded more at home off the grid.
-
May 3, 2022It’s a record filled with trite sentiments and well-trodden musical ideas (or in some cases, badly-trodden).
Awards & Rankings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 82 out of 99
-
Mixed: 12 out of 99
-
Negative: 5 out of 99
-
May 6, 2022
-
May 6, 2022
-
May 6, 2022