User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 32 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 27 out of 32
-
Mixed: 4 out of 32
-
Negative: 1 out of 32
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
JasonJan 22, 2006This has been out in the Uk for a little while now and I simply cannot stop playing it. The lyrics aren't the most sophisticated in the world but the hooks from the guitar and bass just snare you. Their website is a lot of fun too.
-
-
LukeB.DMar 8, 2007One of the best albums of the last few years if not the best!!!
-
-
MarcusFApr 13, 2007Good album
-
-
JackOct 12, 2006This album is not going to win anything, but it won my heart. I have no idea how the end of the cd is getting so much slack. Between "Worth the Wait" and "What's the Word", i can't stop. Just put "Can't Lose" at the end and you have 3 of the best sounding songs of this year. I just wish the rest of the album was as good as those three.
-
-
AnthonyBJan 19, 2006I loved every song except one. Though several sounded alike, that is certainly not a bad thing!
-
-
KatieSFeb 12, 2006I thought this cd was well put together and rockin!
-
-
tomwAug 28, 2006One of the best albums released in the past 4 years, along with soad/slipknot/futureheads and modest mouse. Inaction, nobody move, this scene is dead, the great escape are the best songs
-
-
LeeHJun 26, 2006Don't read the overall review from the critics, as MC has missed out highly favourable reviews from the likes of NME, Guradian, Uncut and Mojo. Not quite a classic, but by no means a risky purchase. Get indie-pop that will keep your head bopping, but not so shallow that you think you'd have heard everything in one listen. Clever and catchy
-
-
GaboSMay 31, 2006
-
-
KimberleyTJan 18, 2006A solid album, lots of fun. The first four songs are especially good.
-
-
cablesJan 18, 2006Really cool record. Nothing you haven't heard before, but it'll still keep you dancing on repeat listens.
-
-
mattaJan 24, 2006Yea, it's been done before, but that doesn't mean that it isn't good. Could be long-forgotten in a few months, but for now, I'm really enjoying this. Just as good as The Strokes newest album.
-
-
NickFeb 1, 2006It's a pretty good album, but after a few listens gets boring. There are a few songs that make you want to go back and listen, but you won't want to listen to the rest of the album.
-
-
AndrewJan 30, 2006Nothing special. Catchy, yet repetitive. Sounds like they're trying to copy some other groups/artists. No variation within the album to me. Could have experimented more.
-
-
Jun 25, 2012It's 12 tracks of standard Indie rock that could have been put out by any band. To be fair ,there are some very good songs on this but nothing mindblowing (although I do really like It's a Hit). I've found its the kind of record you'd mildly enjoy but won't play very often. The style is limited - not much variation across the songs. Just fell short of an extra mark for me.
-
MattFeb 3, 2006These Scientists forgot to add one crucial ingredient: the hooks.
-
-
BillboardDespite undeniable similarities to other bands that arrived at this party earlier, this album lacks pretension and self-importance. [21 Jan 2006]
-
By no means have We Are Scientists made a great record, but it shows enough promise to make us believe that it might just be possible in the future.
-
We Are Scientists come off well in being both snide and playful. Finding that balance is what makes With Love and Squalor a solid debut.