User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 413 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 190 out of 413
-
Mixed: 87 out of 413
-
Negative: 136 out of 413
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
AdrianL.Jan 5, 2008Painful to listen to, this album just could have been so much more.
-
-
someguySep 8, 2004this is a piece of fucking shit with only 2 good songs: Frantic and Purify, don't waste your money on this, just download it if you REALLY want it. Oh, by the way, Lars has a receeding hairline and is going bald
-
-
KevinM.Jun 14, 2003
-
-
billhJun 17, 2003Bizzarre drum sounds, hollow, annoying. no lead GUITARS or melody
-
-
stephenyoJul 25, 2003To address all those people who say that Metallica has changed and evolved...you are only half right. Metallica has certainly changed...but in the wrong way! They have devolved!! If you guys want to hear a real metal band, then check out Iced Earth. They have a much better chance of saving metal than these grumpy old men who are just shadows of their former selves.
-
-
kwtAug 4, 2003Better than most of the 90s albums. Nothing like the real Metallica albums of the 80s -- no haunting riffs and melodies. Maybe Bob Rock should listen to "Master of Puppets" at least once before screwing up another album. What the hell is Lars doing playing a steel drum??
-
-
JoshASep 14, 2006
-
-
JoaoM.Jun 14, 2007Well, it's pretty poor.
-
-
ElpoA.OJul 9, 2007I love metallica, but this CD is really bad in comparison with EVERYTHING they've done before, even Load and Re-Load.
-
-
BrettS.Jun 25, 2007Metallica still remain my favorite band, but this album sucks. The drums sound like trash cans which is just fuckin annoying. Why did they even release this album? Didnt they realize all the flaws in this album before they released it? the only reason why they made this album was for the money. hope the next album doesnt suck like this one. Do yourself a favor, stick to the first 5 albums.
-
-
JackS.Sep 13, 2008Just noise.
-
-
Jun 5, 2019St. Anger was a nonsense that even today continues to torment the fans of this legendary band.
A horrible battery, some horrible lyrics (and even a bad voice in some songs), a nonexistent bass and a guitar in an ethyl coma make this record the worst slop Metallica threw until 2003. -
CharliePJun 19, 2003Regardless of what the diehards want you to believe - this Met Diehard speaks the truth - this album is NOT good - not by anyone's standards. I just cashed mine in today at CD Exchnage - so save some money and go there first if you really want this load of garbage.
-
-
steveyJul 5, 2003
-
-
miezoNov 9, 2004Use this CD when you're out of toilet paper. It's also a good frisbee. If the CD is for sale, don't buy it. If you can download the CD, don't do it. It will be the worst experience of your life.
-
-
Steven-oNov 9, 2004This ain't METALLICA. This is crap. Retire or get back making real music!!!!
-
-
KeithAMay 4, 2005One of my favourite bands (I've been a fan since 1985) - but this is soooo bad. Lars sounds like he's hitting a tin can with a twig. And the "songs" are dire. Very little to redeem this album. Even the live shows were poor - I ended up walking out in despair. Still, the kids liked it.
-
-
MikeOct 17, 2006Garbage
-
-
YoYoJan 30, 2008Hated it.
-
-
LarsAll-richAug 22, 2003Pure Shit !!! Sounds like bad Pantera!! The drum and guitars are TERRIBLE!!! Where did Metallica put the fuckin' money they made!??? Certainly not in the CD production! I've been following Metallica FOR YEARS, and now, believe me, this is definitely OVER! These assholes pissed me off during the Napstergate, and are not f***ing able to make a godamn good song! DIE METALLICA DIE!!!
-
-
CharliePJun 19, 2003Regardless of what the diehards want you to believe - this Met Diehard speaks the truth - this album is NOT good - not by anyone's standards. I just cashed mine in today at CD Exchnage - so save some money and go there first if you really want this load of garbage.
-
-
davecJun 23, 2003WEAK. Metal is already simple enough, basic cord structure, easy to solo on...and now metallica just turns out garbage like this that is akin to nu-metal...and what's added? Wow, it's faster and there's more aggressive drumming...great...there's tons of better bands out there, this is hardly a 6+ album.
-
-
NiceIceDudeAug 15, 2003
-
-
EliJul 15, 2006
-
-
Mar 8, 2013I can't believe it. I can't even listen to this album without a break. Are we sure that it is by Metallica? Drums sounds like spoons hitting a pot. And it's difficult to find one good song. Horrible.
-
Jun 15, 2016There are a lot of reasons this doesn't work, and most of them can be grouped under the umbrella of "This sound here and that sound there don't sound like they even belong in the same song." But mostly, it's Lars' terrible, terrible Frankendrum. This is the Will Ferrell SNL cowbell sketch extended to album length.
-
May 15, 2019I think they made the songs this bad on purpose so no one would want to illegally download them. They get a 2 just for that hahaha.
-
RobASep 6, 2004
-
-
RickycJun 12, 2003
-
-
seanoJun 17, 2003good god this album sucks something fierce!
-
Awards & Rankings
-
MojoThis is miffed and exemplary metal. [Jul 2003, p.108]
-
UncutAgainst all odds, St. Anger constitutes the cutting edge of commercial yet aggressive heavy rock in 2003. [Aug 2003, p.106]
-
The production on St. Anger is abysmal.