• Record Label: RCA
  • Release Date: Apr 29, 2014
Metascore
78

Generally favorable reviews - based on 11 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 11
  2. Negative: 0 out of 11
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Apr 29, 2014
    83
    Supernova’s experiments aren’t all triumphs by any means, but, given how painless it would have been to stay the course, LaMontagne is to be commended for taking on a challenge at all.
  2. Mojo
    Jul 24, 2014
    80
    The resulting arrangements are masterful affairs that frame LaMontagne's material with great taste and flair. [Jul 2014, p.90]
  3. May 1, 2014
    80
    There's nothing here that's exactly new, but by assembling an array of unexpected influences in one blissful place, Lamontagne has crafted an unlikely perfect summer soundtrack.
  4. Uncut
    Apr 29, 2014
    80
    Unexpectedly exhilarating. [Jun 2014, p.79]
  5. Apr 29, 2014
    75
    Although Supernova represents the idealistic (and exospheric) possibilities for LaMontagne after 10 years in the industry, what gets lost in the experimentation is the emotional connection previously forged though clear playing and exposed lyricism.
  6. Classic Rock Magazine
    Dec 18, 2014
    70
    Dan Auerbach's production is warmly intimate, LaMontangne's singing a quiet marvel. [Jul 2014, p.95]
  7. May 9, 2014
    70
    Like [Beck's] Morning Phase, even Supernova’s failures prove an interesting listen, and when LaMontagne hits his stride, it’s an album that contains some of his best material in years.
  8. Apr 30, 2014
    70
    LaMontagne thread his needle through many styles, mostly good ones. The result might just lull you into tomorrow.
  9. Apr 29, 2014
    70
    Supernova is unapologetically and indulgently retro; a casual listen might dismiss it as mere nostalgia. But pairing Auerbach's detailed, careful production with LaMontagne's open, expertly crafted songwriting and breezy, sensual, emotionally unburdened signing, that boundary is shattered.
  10. Apr 29, 2014
    70
    Predictably, Auerbach helps the singer pull bright colors from the Sixties' crayon box; less predictably, he makes it seem a perfectly logical progression of LaMontagne's 10-plus years of cozy vibes.
User Score
7.6

Generally favorable reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 11 out of 14
  2. Negative: 1 out of 14
  1. Jul 9, 2014
    5
    We waited four years for this? I love Ray's music and appreciate that he wants to grow by exploring history. However, this album is a majorWe waited four years for this? I love Ray's music and appreciate that he wants to grow by exploring history. However, this album is a major snooze. We don't live in 1967 San Francisco and we really don't need the psychedelia today, though I see the critics are smoking the funny stuff. I simply don't want to listen to this album time after time like I did God Willing and others. Its great, even important, to explore, but put out an album every year or two an alternate between pure rip-off and more original work so we can see the development. Waiting this long for a second, less interesting and accessible rip-off is annoying. Full Review »
  2. May 2, 2014
    10
    If there's any justice for a singer-songwriter who deserves credit for growing as an artist, Ray will pick up two or three new fans for everyIf there's any justice for a singer-songwriter who deserves credit for growing as an artist, Ray will pick up two or three new fans for every fan who dismisses Supernova because it's different. Pop artists ride the wave until it ebbs; serious artists look for new shores. I am a new fan after listening to this album! Full Review »