Metascore
54

Mixed or average reviews - based on 23 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 23
  2. Negative: 5 out of 23
  1. The good stuff is strong enough that anyone who cares about Lou Reed's body of work, or Edgar Allan Poe's literary legacy, ought to give it a careful listen.
  2. Reed's wraparound originals are mostly vaudeville, which is to say laughable. [Note: The score listed is for the 2xCD version. The single CD version received a lower score of 1/5 stars.]
  3. Blender
    40
    The format is so rambling and fragmented that is serves neither Poe the storyteller noor Reed the songwriter. [#13, p.97]
  4. The Raven is downright awful, perhaps Reed’s worst album since Metal Machine Music.
  5. Probably makes more sense in a theatre than on your CD player.
  6. The spoken words mix wonderfully with excellent musical arrangements, but the original songs primarily suffer in comparison.
  7. Though perfect for hipster English-lit teachers, ravenous Reed fans will find themselves saying "nevermore."
  8. While that approach might have worked well on stage, on disc it's deeply unsatisfying.
  9. 20
    Really, don't waste your time with this.
  10. The outcome is alternately brilliant and awful, adventurous and boring, incisive and pretentious, over-wrought and subtle.
  11. This experiment in rock 'n' roll Poe is a great success even if you occasionally forget that this is rock 'n' roll after all.
  12. Mojo
    70
    Demanding, certainly, but a formidable and ambitious endeavour achieved with wit and passion. [Feb 2003, p.86]
  13. Of course it's pretentious, but the blend of reading-group rock, goth showtunes and gold standard hamming from Willem Dafoe and Steve Buscemi is surprisingly compelling after a while.
  14. Reed coaxes great performances out of a few unexpected collaborators--Ornette Coleman delivers frenetic sax playing on “Guilty,” and downtown singer Antony warbles in a truly otherworldly soprano on “The Bed”--but these players are crowded out by the album’s sprawling mediocrity.
  15. This album is as much of a baffling nadir as Metal Machine Music, with nowhere near the stoned bravado.
  16. The Raven... does fly on the side of the bizarre, but it holds some rich pickings.
  17. In the end, what makes this fabulous disaster of an album work is the passion of Reed's performance.
  18. Q Magazine
    60
    Inevitably, it's a bit of a mess.... But if you like Poe, or Reed, and can tolerate the incoherence, there's fun to be had. [Feb 2003, p.105]
  19. Reed has once again stretched the boundaries of popular music and, in doing so, has honored Edgar Allan Poe's illustrious legacy, along with his own.
  20. Maybe it worked on the stage, but taken out of context the result is a two-hour "Huh?" of an album.
  21. The Wire
    70
    A rewarding and self-consciously motley fest. [#227, p.60]
  22. Uncut
    40
    All albums are vanity projects, but this vanity may be in vain. [Feb 2003, p.76]
User Score
8.4

Universal acclaim- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 14
  2. Negative: 1 out of 14
  1. Jul 16, 2019
    10
    The gorgeous epitome of Lou's lifelong literary ambitions, perfectly culminating his career on such a fitting dark note. Truly beautiful workThe gorgeous epitome of Lou's lifelong literary ambitions, perfectly culminating his career on such a fitting dark note. Truly beautiful work of art, a timeless classic for myself and the likes. Full Review »
  2. EnriqueR
    Dec 9, 2006
    10
    Lou Reed is a classic. Classics should be listened, not criticised...Is a great albuem, for Reed fans and for Poe fans...and if you have Lou Reed is a classic. Classics should be listened, not criticised...Is a great albuem, for Reed fans and for Poe fans...and if you have anything bad to say, first you should listen "The Velvet Underground and Nico" and remember who Lou Reed is... Full Review »
  3. Cosmo
    Jun 2, 2005
    10
    Makes me want to dance! The most sensual party album of the decade