- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
So instantly pleasing, the trickery is transparent, a hook to keep listening until the content of Toby Leaman and Scott McMicken’s songs makes itself known.
-
Fate still manages to be a master class in illusory "good" songwriting. The bulk of it is so fenced into classicist templates-- chamber-y pop meets maximum R&B with the occasional smidge of "tasteful" gospel/parlour games ("Hang On") that, even when merely competent, it can still win over those unimpressed with all that punk and hip-hop riff raff of the past three decades.
-
For now, it looks like Dr. Dog will stick to their sunny, over-produced pop songs, finding safe ground, pitching tent, and making camp for the night.
-
Fate exposes the larger problem with Dr. Dog’s catalog -- namely, that the band have become so comfortable where they are that they are content to merely play to type.
-
Fate feels less like a straight tribute to Dr. Dog's elders and more like a finely tuned collage.
-
Unfortunately, it's also phenomenally uninteresting. That isn't to say that the album is bad. Put it on at a low-key party and nobody will complain--but they probably won't ask you what it is either.
-
With such impeccable raw materials, it's inevitable that several songs here are irresistible, notably Fate and The Old Days, the former a trembling love song, the latter a clattering hoe-down. Even so, a little more idiosyncrasy wouldn't go amiss.
-
UncutDr. Dog have stepped up to the plate for the fifth album and hits a homer. [Sep 2008, p.88]
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 25 out of 29
-
Mixed: 2 out of 29
-
Negative: 2 out of 29
-
Sep 4, 2019
-
EliCApr 8, 2009
-
krinklykrinklesFeb 17, 2009Solid album. just short of perfect. probably the best underrated band out today.