User Score
Mixed or average reviews- based on 47 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 23 out of 47
-
Mixed: 3 out of 47
-
Negative: 21 out of 47
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Jul 14, 2015
-
[Anonymous]Apr 22, 2008Anyone who has to use 'Avril Lavigne' as why this album is good automatically has an invalid opinion. This album is disgusting.
-
-
MadJackApr 21, 2007Navarro, though a good guitarist, is commercial cheese. This band is commercial cheese. Tailored to appeal to women that pine after bad boy rocker types. Anyone with a set below the belt will find it over-dramatic and contrived. Nothing new or original, visceral or inspiring here.
-
-
BluceReeApr 4, 2007
-
-
JoeBFeb 1, 2007this cd is really bad. it shows what happens when you dumb down stephen perkins part and audition a chris cornell wannabe
-
-
ChuckLJan 19, 2007This disc is so terrible. If I ever see Dave or Steve Isaacs walking around SLO, I'm going to KTFO of both of them for putting out this garbage.
-
-
NathanOct 21, 2006this album really lacks quality and depth
-
-
QWilsonOct 1, 2006The reason people hate this album is NOTHING to do with it being 'different' to Jane's Addiction. If you totally ignore anyone's previous work and take this album at face value, fact is, it is BAD. It's simply BAD MUSIC. Avoid this tosh. It's the worst album I've ever bought. Generic as hell.
-
-
cleopatrajSep 25, 2006shite.
-
-
MattD.Sep 14, 2006Not terrible. But fails to make you feel ANYTHING, which can be worse.
-
-
BenSep 13, 2006Why would anyone ever listen to this. It is the worst album I have heard all year. They do a mediocre job of playing bad songs and they are so unoriginal that it could be elevator music. Bad elevator music.
-
-
timfSep 13, 2006Dave Navarro's new band asks Why Cry? with their new single. Why? Because your album is pop and awful. U have lost all originality
-
-
ErikHSep 12, 2006
-
-
sethdSep 9, 2006Jane's Addiction was a throbbing living organism of dangerous, psychocosmic rock. The best there ever was, as displayed on Ritual de lo Habitual. The Panic Channel is a dull, limp mass of wet fur on the side of rock and rolls most traveled highway. This may be the most unimportant album since that time the guys who sing the "Friends" theme song cut a record, if not ever.
-
-
MikeLSep 7, 2006
-
-
SandraASep 2, 2006Perhaps the worst release of 2006. Everyone involved with this should be embarrassed.
-
-
JJSep 1, 2006The absolute worst of the worst. If it was possible to give this a negative score, I would.
-
-
jerrybAug 25, 2006This is a very boring Channel!!! It is not easy to explain that 50% lets say 75% of Jane's Addiction is in this band... Because this Channel sounds like utter CRAP. I can't beleive the bandmembers themselves seriously thinks that only one of these songs is great.... Sorry for Dave and Steven to throw away their special talents on this, I hope, One MISTAKE.
-
-
SarahK.Aug 22, 2006Poor lyric writing, boring songwriting, dated sound, etc. etc. Steve Isaacs is easily the weak link with this band. Why he was picked for this band, we may never know. Hopefully they will be (ONe) and done, so people will not have to put up with this kind of mediocrity in the future.
-
Awards & Rankings
-
For those listeners who pine for a world when Seven Mary Three received heavy rotation, this will satisfy, but anybody expecting the spark of Jane's Addiction or even a dose of Navarro's campy on-camera charm will be sorely disappointed.
-
Alternative PressThe result: a CD without hooks, impressive guitar pyrotechnics, or anything else, really. [Sep 2006, p.226]
-
It's hard to believe these men were once innovators.