The Observer (UK)'s Scores

For 2,616 reviews, this publication has graded:
  • 37% higher than the average critic
  • 4% same as the average critic
  • 59% lower than the average critic
On average, this publication grades 4.9 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)
Average Music review score: 68
Highest review score: 100 Gold-Diggers Sound
Lowest review score: 20 Collections
Score distribution:
2616 music reviews
    • 84 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    Sensitive and punchy as always.
    • 75 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    The result crackles with a wired energy that doubles down on his core creative tenets, while still sounding like no other White record released previously.
    • 79 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Uptempo numbers such as the Pharrell-produced Tamagotchi and the chugging Talk, meanwhile, feel shoehorned in for radio play, removing breathing space for Apollo’s vibrato-laden voice and overstuffing the record to 16 tracks. Apollo’s aptitude for unexpected genres can provide beautiful results, as on the yearning En El Olvido, but it can equally speak of a jarring restlessness.
    • 87 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    A handful more tracks and now, the full monty, reveals that there seem to be two Wet Legs high-kicking for supremacy: the knockabout, sly, absurdist outfit and a band that turn out to be quite like a lot of other bands.
    • 75 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Peel’s intentions are sound, the results are very pretty and the live shows will be great, but what ensues is still a modern classical-electronic crossover that relies too much on orthodox musicality to truly do its subjects justice.
    • 71 Metascore
    • 40 Critic Score
    Bloated and self-indulgent, it plods along, with barely a memorable melody or thought-provoking lyric among its 17 tracks.
    • 79 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    A class act.
    • 75 Metascore
    • 40 Critic Score
    Doherty’s weak, watery quiver of a voice is over-exposed on Lo’s parodic pop fantasias, which veer from syrupy and insincere fluff to low-stakes Smiths tributes.
    • 87 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    With its atmospheric melody and operatic harmonies, it’s a truly evocative listen.
    • 82 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Unfortunately, there’s often this vast emotional chasm in his music, a feeling that nothing ever means anything, until the final two tracks, The States and The Last Song, which prove that he can write a lovely, affecting lyric after all.
    • 82 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    Clearly Harding is still having fun, and while it can make for a somewhat jarring listening experience, her playfulness adds depth to this charming record.
    • 94 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    The album’s feminist slant is “implicit” and reggaeton – the Latin American style heavily influenced by Caribbean sounds – powers a handful of sassy party flexes, a first for this artist, better known for her flamenco background. Staccato rhythms figure heavily, maintaining this unconventional pop artist’s edge. All that energy is balanced out by heartbreak on quieter ballads such as Como Un G and a handful of tracks where Rosalía’s first-class voice is allowed to take more traditional flight.
    • 81 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    Reason to Smile brings to mind Ms Dynamite’s 2002 Mercury-winning A Little Deeper : era-defining works that blend hip-hop with neo-soul and jazz, and storytelling that paints the Black British experience with the finest of brushes.
    • 70 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Taken as a whole, though, Who Cares? is so unvarying in its sentimental melodies that it begins to fade into the background, so unobtrusive that it becomes unremarkable.
    • 85 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    There’s nothing here that’s particularly immediate, the likes of Cemetery of Splendour only gradually yielding their delights. Instead, Classic Objects is unceasingly intriguing.
    • 85 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Their debut album, co-written and co-produced with Soulwax, is a treasure chest of funk, French house, sweaty techno and all kinds of dirty electronic weirdness to rival Moloko at their freakiest. But their takes on the fraught subject of wokeness on Esperanto (“Don’t say: I would like a black Americano/ Say: I’ll have an African American, please”), or sexual agency on the Timbaland-flavoured dark R&B of Reappropriate err on the side of basic.
    • 82 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    It’s keyboards that take centre stage here on a set of energetic, electro-indie cuts that are as dancefloor-friendly as anything he has been involved with since Electronic.
    • 84 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    These songs about love and existential sorrow feel purposely airy and unanchored – there’s no percussion – mirroring the psychological freefall of recent times. Ironically, though, they firm up the parallels between Lindeman and fellow complex Canadian, Joni Mitchell.
    • 72 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    This is, ultimately, an album that has a spectacularly strong sense of place – London, NW1 and NW3 – and some very definitive British musical reference points, which nonetheless wonders, eloquently, where home is.
    • 83 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    The end result finds elegance trumping excitement.
    • 89 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    Because Because ends this gutsy, ambience-heavy record with joyous, Middle Eastern birdlike calls from Golding, calls that appear to answer themselves, thanks to Luthert.
    • 74 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    The uncharitable take would be that a 37-year-old still writing lyrics in txt spk is quite cringe, but the truth is that Love Sux – three-minute banger after three-minute banger, complete with classic Lavigne “woah-oh-ohs” – is exuberant enough to have you slipping on a pair of Vans and partying like it’s 2002.
    • 82 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    All last year’s singles plus a dozen new drops here add up to an excellent, if exhausting, mixtape. Sensibly, songs confine themselves to three minutes or less, and there’s a wild joy to their commitment to entertainment.
    • 87 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    A brace of great tunes make the case: Rhododendron nods at Jonathan Richman’s Roadrunner, somehow making wildflowers sound gloriously disreputable. Saga, meanwhile, is a traumatised ballad that channels David Bowie, but with acoustic guitars and horns.
    • 84 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    It’s testament to the structure and variety of Once Twice Melody that it never lags over 18 tracks, its gradual release paradoxically validating the album format as one still worth surrendering to, totally.
    • 76 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    With Prey/IV, Glass seizes control of the sequence, and the narrative, for herself.
    • 79 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    The Dream is another enjoyable stroll around the band’s latest curiosity shop.
    • 88 Metascore
    • 80 Critic Score
    The result is their most varied and expansive record to date.
    • 76 Metascore
    • 60 Critic Score
    Every so often, the disparate parts coalesce into something enjoyable: We Go Back and Dragon Slayer both exhibit a lovely playfulness. Stretched over 48 minutes, though, there’s the sense that for all its undoubted cleverness, Time Skiffs is not terribly easy to warm to.
    • 92 Metascore
    • 100 Critic Score
    To get the full effect, listen to the album from start to finish, over and over again. It’s a blast.