Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 17 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 16 out of 17
  2. Negative: 0 out of 17
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Q Magazine
    Dec 14, 2015
    80
    II is propelled by Segall's forceful energy. [Jan 2016, p.111]
  2. Mojo
    Dec 14, 2015
    80
    A rich seam of molten psychedelic heaviness pitched between Black Sabbath and Blue Cheer. [Jan 2016, p.96]
  3. Magnet
    Nov 17, 2015
    80
    Though only mildly collaborative, II us just as thrilling as many of Segall's finest works. [No. 126, p.57]
  4. Oct 29, 2015
    80
    Fuzz do one thing--creepy, heavy fuzz rock--but do it really well.
  5. 80
    II is another step forward for a band who were once a side project, but now stand firmly alone and away from the shade cast by others.
  6. Oct 22, 2015
    80
    It’s a mountainously huge album, and faintly exhausting for that, but those majestic peaks are well worth the trek.
  7. Oct 21, 2015
    80
    Almost all of II has a first-take rawness, well recorded, but without fuss.
  8. Oct 21, 2015
    80
    Built on a fuzzy foundation, II is as classic as a psychedelic-stoner-rock record can be, building on well-loved tropes but never hesitant to colour outside the lines.
  9. 80
    As the sprawling title-track brings the album to a close around the 67-minute mark, the heft of it all can feel overpowering, leaving you wishing for a more concentrated dose.
  10. Nov 5, 2015
    78
    Commencing the hourlong disc is brazen seven-minute opener "Time Collapse," its stoner psychedelia mash enduring throughout 14 tracks.
  11. Oct 21, 2015
    75
    If II proves anything, it’s that Fuzz remains a force to be reckoned with. Segall and co. have only honed their chops in the years since their debut, and it’s almost terrifying to project what will come in the next stage of their evolution.
  12. Nov 3, 2015
    70
    While II has its stellar (and interstellar) moments, the band could use a little focus--otherwise they could risk becoming just a fuzzy memory.
  13. Oct 26, 2015
    70
    If there’s a quibble with II, it’s that like most doubles, it would be more effective as a single disc.
  14. Oct 22, 2015
    70
    The production on II is cleaner than on Fuzz's first studio album without ironing out the nooks and crannies of the band's sound (the report of Moothart and Ubovich's amps is just as fierce and buzzy as ever), and listeners who resonate to Iommic frequencies will get a righteous shake from this music.
  15. Uncut
    Oct 21, 2015
    70
    While Fuzz II has some absolute stormers, some of the proto-metal songs are a little too ponderous to really click. [Nov 2015, p.76]
  16. Nov 4, 2015
    67
    Even considering all the high points and raw power, II falters under the weight of the band's ambition.
  17. Oct 29, 2015
    60
    All this studious box-ticking and attention-to-detail comes at a price, which is that II becomes more of a tribute to the music of yesteryear than, say, a work of art that’s relevant to the world surrounding it.
User Score
8.3

Universal acclaim- based on 4 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. Oct 26, 2015
    8
    The second album of Fuzz creates an intensity in the powerful guitar sounds, exaggerated singing and rhythmic drumming. Different decades inThe second album of Fuzz creates an intensity in the powerful guitar sounds, exaggerated singing and rhythmic drumming. Different decades in the music are passing by, audible in the early metal, psychedelia and blues rock. Ty Segall is the master of musical expressions, though Moothart and Ubovich provide the heavy guitar rhythm of the band. Although the influences of other musicians are present, without difficulty the man providing their own musical contribution to it. Fuzz should therefore not go through life as a project, but as a power trio with the ability to revive the old times.

    Full Review: http://www.platendraaier.nl/albumrecensies/fuzz-ii/
    Full Review »