User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 76 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 56 out of 76
-
Mixed: 11 out of 76
-
Negative: 9 out of 76
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
mechallnOct 2, 2005crap! all crap! god i h8 these guys! if our country and our leaders suck so much, go live somewhere else! totally overrated artists.
-
-
PaulHNov 7, 2005It's just boring music, from what use to be a great band, it's so dull and long. they should of ended the band after "Some Girls", we all know this though some (most) are in denial. The Stones have been embarassing themselves for the last 25 years.
-
-
AlanRNov 7, 2005Why won't Mick Jagger just die already? Then I might be able to listen to their back catalogue and not feel dirty.
-
-
jcarlsonSep 25, 2005The writing is weak and juvenile. Jagger has be come bitter and Richard and Wood can't lift these tunes above that or the song structure.
-
-
TimothyRSep 7, 2005This is not the big comeback we were all hoping for. This album is as ugly as Keith's leathery face. The lyrics do Spinal Tap proud and the music is dull and uninspired.
-
-
radarSep 8, 2005"Bridges To Babylon" is an impressingly lot better than this. Don't ask me what the Allmusic and RollingStone critics are thinking about - daring to tell people anything else. Wipe the dust off of your Babylon-disc and enjoy some good Stones instead!
-
-
[Anonymous]Nov 20, 2005just because they rocked a long time ago doesnt make this album likeable. in other words it sux.
-
Awards & Rankings
-
A strong, engaging, cohesive Rolling Stones album that finds everybody in prime form.
-
Some of their best work in nearly two decades.
-
Billboard16 songs of stalwart Stones riffs that almost compensate for generally embarrassing lyrics. [10 Sep 2005]