User Score
Generally favorable reviews- based on 334 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 269 out of 334
-
Mixed: 35 out of 334
-
Negative: 30 out of 334
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Guidov.Jun 30, 2007I really don't get this band and their rising popularity. What's special about this? It's pretentious, it doesn't really rock the balls out of your pants and the musicians are nothing special.
-
-
TreySOct 2, 2006How far down will Brandon's ego take the band?
-
-
MCOct 3, 2006I recently them perform on SNL....when i heard Flowers "attempting" to sing I lost whatever small amount of respect I had for them. It was embarassing to watch him. This album has just cemented that. totally over-hyped hacks.
-
-
JakeM.Oct 5, 2006So if we were rating this on the Unintentional Comedy Scale, it would be a 10 out of 10. But let's keep this legit - this is junk, pure and straight up.
-
-
RAGGAMOct 17, 2006Bad, boring, installed into a stardom that ironically have killed them. People use to talk about their new sound as a disguise that you can buy, but in music the real good things dont work like that. And this album is simply bad.
-
-
JamesOct 17, 2006
-
-
GaborAOct 3, 2006It's hard to say what direction the killers stepped in considering they started off at terrible and landed in abysmal. As musicians they can be considered psuedo retards. As venture capitalists, however, they are geniuses. Eat this one up too america.
-
-
DenOct 3, 2006Much more fun the last time. The killers are best when being clever with a smile, when showing a sense of humor. Sam's Town drowns in self-importance and buckles under the weight of their heros, namely Bruce Springsteen, U2, Morrissey, and Depeche Mode. Better luck next time!
-
-
SeanOct 4, 2006This album is terrible. Bruce Springsteen should sue The Killers for damaging his legacy. Wow, just wow.
-
-
stephenbOct 6, 2006"hot fuss" was damn near perfect. how did they go so horribly wrong on this album? bye bye simplistic catchy pop hooks. this album sounds like meatloaf and andrew lloyd webber wrote a musical about america. very disappointing.
-
-
JMoSep 28, 2006The cracks are showing on this album...Flowers was obviously hoping that his delicate voice could touch Springsteen or Mercury (Freddie that is) and the simple fact is...it can't. The Killers shoulda stuck with what they knew best.
-
-
DaveKOct 15, 2006Emo meets Springsteen with a closed head injury lyrics. Lacks the zeal of Hot Fuss and the updated-retro alternative fun. Sam's sounds clunky, over-dramatic and joyless. The change in sound is unfortunate, a backlash is coming.
-
-
EricWOct 3, 2006Ouch. Watch The Killers crash and burn, blue-collar style.
-
-
AndrewR.Oct 4, 2006ouch, tough to listen to. I didn't "enjoy the show", and frankly "Sam's town" should only have a population of 3.
-
-
jimhOct 5, 2006no me gusta
-
-
trimmOct 7, 2006im sorry but this sucks.
-
-
PaulBNov 21, 2008Awful, was expecting a better album than the last one which was only half good but amazingly this is rubbish all the way through.
-
-
joejDec 1, 2006The whole record is in a key that doesn't suit Brandon's voice. He sounds like he is struggling throughout. Musically lame and lyrically the same. Posturing significance doesn't give significance. Disappointingly weak.
-
-
NicoleGNov 23, 2007absolute garbage
-
Awards & Rankings
-
UncutThe problem... is that size seems to be used as an excuse for the lack of musical ideas. [Nov 2006, p.102]
-
Crucially, Sam's Town sounds like a complete collection, with a far better strike rate than its predecessor.
-
It is very good.