- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
The butter-drenched vocal harmonies can be overwhelming in spots, but each of the principals involved brings enough of his songwriting savvy to the table to make The Thorns a guilty pleasure of pure California dreamin'.
-
If there's a follow-up (and there should be), perhaps Droge, Mullins, and Sweet will give more thought to what makes a Thorns song, besides the gleaming surfaces.
-
This is toothless, banal music that is so sweet it's like eating an extra helping of cotton candy.
-
The most successful songs are those that either embrace their influences so fully that they become glorious reproductions or those that dispense with the idol worship altogether.
-
BlenderSome of the brightest three-part harmony singing since Crosby, Stills & Nash first gathered around a mic 30-plus years ago. [#17, p.144]
-
UncutIt's a long time since we heard three-part harmonies as good as this from anyone. [Jun 2003, p.104]
-
MojoOccasionally gestures towards greatness, but remains earthbound for the most part. [Sep 2003, p.112]
-
Entertainment WeeklyWhen an entire CD turns into a game of spot the classic-rock reference, it's distracting, not to mention dull. [23 May 2003, p.72]
-
Q MagazineSomething rather lovely with a jittery edge that halts proceedings well before they arrive at saccharine-sweet. [Aug 2003, p.115]
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 9 out of 10
-
Mixed: 1 out of 10
-
Negative: 0 out of 10
-
rchavezSep 18, 2003
-
BrianMJun 12, 2003
-
CharlesGJun 1, 2003Bought this and the new Jayhawks on the same day and cant wait for one to finish so can hear the other again. What a dilema!