Mary Star of the Sea
by Zwan
Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 19 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Pitchfork
    48
    The problem lies with the songs themselves, which simply lack outstanding or memorable hooks: Most are content to meander behind a curtain of big rock guitars and bigger rock cliches, infinitely repeating themselves or, in some cases, never saying much of anything at all.
  2. PopMatters
    40
    The candied pop that characterized much of the Pumpkins later work is still out in full force.

Awards & Rankings

94
#94 Most Discussed Album of 2003

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
8.7

Universal acclaim- based on 42 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 38 out of 42
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 42
  3. Negative: 2 out of 42
  1. Ricko
    Oct 18, 2017
    9
    The first 4 tracks off this record are sublime and if the standard stayed that high throughout it would have been hard not to give it fullThe first 4 tracks off this record are sublime and if the standard stayed that high throughout it would have been hard not to give it full marks. Unfortunately it doesn't quite manage it but it comes close. Billy Corgans first post Smashing Pumpkins venture delivers with style and substance to boot. Despite the fact that Jimmy Chamberlain is also involved, meaning the crucial part of SP make up the heart of Zwan, they don't really sound as much like the Pumpkins as I would have expected. It could be the psychedelic artwork, but I get a bright, sunny vibe from the record and their is zero of the angst that fuelled the Pumpkins present. The musicianmanship on this record is outstanding and is the standout aspect of the album, the songs are very strong and the production is spot on. It's a great record and a pity they couldn't hold it together to make a follow up. If you like your guitar rock there's a good chance you'll like this one. Doesn't really compare to the Corgan's best work but certainly up there with the rest of their back catalog.… Full Review »
  2. stephens
    Jun 7, 2009
    9
    Amazing. Took off 1 for some (crap)songs.Brilliant album sad that they disbanded so soon.
  3. Joe
    May 24, 2009
    5
    Hmm.. not as good as I would have thought. Many of the songs are boring and sound lazy, but some tracks are really great.
See all user reviews »