- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
And even though Sing-Sing's elements of homage lead to some songs more underdeveloped than charmingly minimal, the duo never sounds less than bright and engaged.
-
Under The RadarBrilliantly combines classic pop, fuzzy guitar effects, and electronic music into an effervescent cohesion. [#12, p.93]
-
It's much more stripped-down and loose compared to the glossy polish of The Joy of Sing-Sing.
-
New Musical Express (NME)A mini-classic of magpie pop. [21 Jan 2006, p.35]
-
Their sophomore effort might be a touch inconsistent, but by keeping things simple and sticking to their strengths, Anderson and O’Neill make us all wish that they don’t take so long putting out album number three.
-
Sing-Sing is as out of sync with 2006 as Lush was in sync with the shoegazing early 1990s.
-
Paste MagazineCall it Trip-Pop. [Apr/May 2006, p.117]
-
MagnetTHe duo has undeniable songstress skills, but it delivers its flawless melodies with the enthusiasm of a sewing circle. [#71, p.113]
-
Q MagazineOddly muted. [Feb 2006, p.104]
-
UncutIt's an odd confection, part digitally-lush Spector-pop, part Dido-esque thirtysomething ennui. [Feb 2006, p.68]
-
Urb[A] rather perplexing, albeit tame ride. [Mar 2006, p.118]