- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Revolutions is pretty breathtaking.
-
Alternative PressSolidly entertaining. [Aug 2004, p.122]
-
BlenderThis album stands on its own, with... an emphasis on beats rather than technical tricks. [#27, p.149]
-
These songs are accented by the X-ecutioners' deft scratching and energetic beats, resulting in a regularly exciting and inventive album.
-
The X-ecutioners force the ire on their third album, Revolutions, with mixed results.
-
The just fair pop tracks keep it from being classic, but this is the best the talented team has sounded on record yet.
-
I find myself pleasantly surprised by just how catchy and accessible the album is.
-
UrbIn a case of not fixing what isn't broken, they return with a veritable cornucopia of crossover-ready collaborators eager to see if lightning can indeed strike twice. [Jul/Aug 2004, p.127]
-
Rolling StoneToo many forgettable concoctions make this just another so-so DJ mix. [10 Jun 2004, p.91]
-
Q MagazineAmidst all this, the trio's scratching feels peripheral, and when it does take centre stage, is underwhelming. [Jul 2004, p.127]
-
Revolutions is an extremely boring affair, never building any momentum from the start to finish.
-
All too often finds X-Ecutioners playing second fiddle to an outsized roster of uninspired guests.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 1
-
Mixed: 0 out of 1
-
Negative: 0 out of 1
-
DaveVJun 11, 2004