Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Feb 7, 2012This is bliss, it's that simple.
-
Feb 13, 2012You're probably not going to find another record quite so beautifully produced this year, or quite so warmly inviting, or just quite so full of lovely stuff.
-
Feb 7, 2012If you like your music with the psychedelic layers of The Field and subtle atmospherics of Joy Orbison, Blondes have so much to give.
-
Q MagazineMar 14, 2012Hypnotic electronic grooves. [April 2012, p.90]
-
Feb 14, 2012A thoroughly good larksome house record.
-
Feb 14, 2012A singularly impressive work.
-
Feb 7, 2012Poignant package-holiday dance, sun-drunk but urgent with passion.
-
Feb 7, 2012Despite retaining a relaxed, lightly psychedelic feel, Blondes' songs are properly functionalist grooves.
-
Feb 14, 2012Overall, while Blondes' debut album isn't quite as dynamic as the EP, it still serves its purpose as a notable standout from the upstart duo.
-
Feb 23, 2012The meandering, incidental quality of their music works alternately in their favor and against them.
-
Feb 23, 2012Music this agreeable and well-produced may not leave the most potent aftertaste, but it still makes for a sweet listen without veering into the saccharine.
-
Apr 13, 2012Take any of these tracks on its own, or even as half of a single, and it is impressive and striking. Listen to seven of them in succession, though, and you slowly notice they all sort of blur together.
-
Mar 12, 2012The results, all shimmering synths and echo effects noodle along on 4/4, often for the best part of seven minutes, and we can't help but feel that some of this has been done before.
-
UncutFeb 8, 2012The Blondes' expansive synth jams can sometimes feel a little directionless. [Mar 2012, p.81]
-
Feb 6, 2012Blondes need to hone themselves-become harder, better, faster, stronger-if they wish to become memorable, to stand out in listeners' minds as something tangible and unique.