Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 15 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 13 out of 15
  2. Negative: 0 out of 15
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Uncut
    Nov 19, 2019
    90
    It's spellbinding, shiver-down-the-spine stuff, and enough to have any self-respecting Quadropheniac dusting down their scooter for one last run down to Brighton. ... Their best since Quadrophenia, then. [Dec 2019, p.22]
  2. Dec 6, 2019
    85
    This album could easily be meant to stand as the band’s collective last word, even while Townshend and Daltrey sound like they’re ready to bang out 10 more closing statements where this one came from.
  3. Dec 6, 2019
    80
    It's the best album the Who have released since Who Are You in 1978.
  4. Dec 5, 2019
    80
    Who feels like a Who album: The two still bring out the best in each other.
  5. Dec 5, 2019
    80
    If this LP isn’t so groundbreaking as Tommy, it’s definitely a logical extension of The Who By Numbers and certain preferable to the forced and pedestrian It’s Hard.
  6. 80
    As big and bold as any fan could hope for.
  7. Dec 2, 2019
    80
    Half of the Who did get old, which means there’s a strong chance this might be their last album. If it is, then they’re going out the way they came in: as cussed and awkward and troubled as ever.
  8. Nov 26, 2019
    80
    It takes something to stay true to the original ‘Who-ish’ sound after 50 years in the game, but unlike so many others, this time they’ve managed to do so with impeccable form.
  9. 80
    There are only two major mis-steps – ‘Beads On One String’ is the kind of amorphous soft rock balladry that Sting used to make in the ‘90s and Townshend’s easy listening ‘I’ll be Back’ descends into a plain awful vocodered rant. ... But otherwise ‘WHO’ either recaptures the band’s root ferocity or explores new territory with style.
  10. Mojo
    Nov 19, 2019
    80
    Musicians writing and singing about being in the seventies is a rare thing in the Peter Pan world of rock--but The Who do it exceptionally well. [Dec 2019, p.92]
  11. Classic Rock Magazine
    Nov 19, 2019
    80
    Potent yet poignant, bright if not blinding. [Dec 2019, p.81]
  12. Dec 5, 2019
    70
    The band may be only half the Who they were when they formed, but Who is worthy of the Who name.
  13. Dec 2, 2019
    67
    This album may not represent one of The Who’s strongest collections of songs, but it’s the rare case study of a legacy brand as a vehicle for plumbing new ideas and moving forward.
  14. 60
    On the surface, Who sounds like a classic Who album. ... There are moments when Townshend stops questioning his own relevancy, but to dubious effect: “Beads on a String” is a limp metaphor for human connection, while “Hero Ground Zero” is just as clumsy.
  15. Q Magazine
    Nov 19, 2019
    60
    A vigorous, if patchy comeback. [Jan 2020, p.114]
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 30 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 30
  2. Negative: 4 out of 30
  1. Dec 7, 2019
    6
    Pros: It still has the classic Who sound. It is technically proficient and it is easy to listen to.

    Cons: The main failing of this album
    Pros: It still has the classic Who sound. It is technically proficient and it is easy to listen to.

    Cons: The main failing of this album is the songwriting. The lyrics are preachy and cliched to the point where it makes me want to turn it off. The rhymes are just annoyingly poor.
    Full Review »
  2. Dec 12, 2019
    0
    Could have been way better. I dont know them much and haven't listened to their previous work but this could be way way better
  3. Dec 6, 2019
    9
    Forgive the pun, but Who knew they had an album this good in them? Townshend's writing is terse, melodic, and thematically timely. And he'sForgive the pun, but Who knew they had an album this good in them? Townshend's writing is terse, melodic, and thematically timely. And he's written masterfully around Daltrey's fraying voice, so the singing sounds superb....and better than Rog has sounded on recent youTube live recordings. Also, whatever trickery they employed to fill out the baking vocals worked brilliantly; they sound like The Who slightly thickened and synthed out. A wow all the way for me. Full Review »